Simulation of osmotic pressure in concentrated aqueous salt solutions

Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 183-189

  Luo, Yun ^a   Roux, Benoît ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Clusters; Dynamics; Excited states

Indexed keywords

AQUEOUS SALT SOLUTION; AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; BIOMOLECULAR SIMULATION; CLUSTERS; CONCENTRATED SOLUTION; FORCE FIELD PARAMETERS; FORCE FIELDS; HIGH SALT CONCENTRATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; NON-ADDITIVE; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; POLARIZABLE FORCE FIELD; PRACTICAL METHOD; SEMI-PERMEABLE MEMBRANES; SIMPLE MODEL; SIMULATION STUDIES; SOLUBILITY LIMITS;

EXCITED STATES; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

OSMOSIS;

EID: 77149136136     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19487185     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jz900079w     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Åqvist, J. Ion Water Interaction Potential Derived from Free Energy Perturbation Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 8021-8024.
2. Beglov, D.; Roux, B. Finite Representation of an Infinite Bulk System: Solvent Boundary Potential for Computer Simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 9050-9063.
3. Chen, A. A.; Pappu, R. V. Parameters of Monovalent Ions in the AMBER-99 Forcefield: Assessment of Inaccuracies and Proposed Improvements. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 11884-11887.
4. Joung, I. S.; Cheatham, T. E. Determination of Alkali and Halide Monovalent Ion Parameters for Use in Explicitly Solvated Biomolecular Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112,9020-9041.
5. Wang, J.; Cieplak, P.; Kollman, P. A. How Well Does a Restrained Electrostatic Potential (RESP) Model Perform in Calculating Conformational Energies of Organic and Biological Molecules? J. Comput. Chem. 2000, 21, 1049-1074.
6. Hess, B.; van der Vegt, N. F. A. Cation Specific Binding with Protein Surface Charges. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106,13296-13300.
7. Marlow, G. E.; Pettitt, B. M. Simulations of the Bis-penicillamine Enkephalin in Sodium Chloride Solution: A Parameter Study. Biopolymers (Pept. Sci.) 2001, 60, 134-152.
8. Enderby, J. E. Neutron Scattering from Ionic Solutions. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1983, 34, 155.
9. Leberman, R.; Soper, A. K. Effect of High Salt Concentrations on Water Structure. Nature 1995, 378, 364-366.
10. Neilson, G. W.; Mason, P. E.; Ramos, R.; Sullivan, D. Neutron and X-ray Scattering Studies of Hydration in Aqueous Solution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, A 2001, 359, 1595-1591.
11. Altenberger, A. R.; Friedman, H. L. Theory of Conductance and Related Isothermal Transport Coefficients in Electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 78, 4162-4173.
12. McMillan, W. G.; Mayer, J. E. The Statistical Thermo dynamics of Multicomponent Systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1945, 13, 276-305.
13. Kirkwood, J.G.; Buff, F.P. The Statistical Mechanical Theory of Solutions. I. J. Chem. Phys. 1951, 19, 774-777.
14. Ben Naim, A. Inversion of Kirkwood-Buff Theory of Solutions: Application to Water-Ethanol System. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 67,4884-4890.
15. Cabezas, H.; O'Connell, J. P. Some Uses and Misuses of Thermodynamic Models for Dilute Liquid Solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 32, 2892-2904.
16. Lebowitz, J. L.; Percus, J. K. Mean Spherical Model for Lattice Gases with Extended Hard Cores and Continuum Fluids. Phys. Rev. 1966, 144, 251.
17. Triolo, R.; Grigera, J. R.; Blum, L. Simple Electrolytes in the Mean Spherical Approximation. J. Phys. Chem. 1976, 80, 1858-1861.
18. Allnatt, A. R. Integral Equations in Ionic Solution Theory. Mol. Phys. 1964, 8, 533.
19. Pettitt, B.M.; Rossky, P.J. Alkali Halidesin Water: Ion-Solvent Correlations and Ion-Ion Potentials of Mean Force at Infinite Dilution. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 5836-5844.
20. Lyubartsev, A.P.; Laaksonen, A. Osmotic and Activity Coefficients from Effective Potentials for Hydrated Ions. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 55, 5689-5696.
21. Hess, B.; Holm, C.; van der Vegt, N. F. A. Osmotic Coefficients of Atomistic NaCl (aq) Force Fields. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 164509.
22. Krienke, H.; Vlachy, V.; Ahn-Ercan, G.; Bako, I. Modeling Tetraalkylammonium Halide Saltsin Water: How Hydrophobic and Electrostatic Interactions Shape the Thermodynamic Properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 4360-4371.
23. Chitra, R.; Smith, P. E. Molecular Association in Solution: A Kirkwood-Buff Analysis of Sodium Chloride, Ammonium Sulfate, Guanidinium Chloride, Urea, and 2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol in Water. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 1491-1500.
24. Weerasinghe, S.; Smith, P. E. A Kirkwood-Buff Derived Force Field for the Simulation of Aqueous Guanidinium Chloride Solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 2180-2186.
25. Weerasinghe, S.; Smith, P. E. A Kirkwood-Buff Derived Force Field for Methanol and Aqueous Methanol Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 15080-15086.
26. Kang, M.; Smith, P. E. A Kirkwood-Buff Derived Force Field for Amides. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1477-1485.
27. Pierce, V.; Kang, M.; Aburi, M.; Weerasinghe, S.; Smith, P. E. Recent Applications of Kirkwood-Buff Theory to Biological Systems. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 50, 1-22.
28. Rosgen, J.; Pettitt, B. M.; Bolen, D. W. Uncovering the Basis for Nonideal Behavior of Biological Molecules. Biochemistry 2004,43, 14472-14484.
29. Kokubo, H.; Rosgen, J.; Bolen, D. W.; Pettitt, B. M. Molecular Basis of the Apparent near Ideality of Urea Solutions. Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 3392-3407.
30. Rosgen, J.; Pettitt, B. M.; Bolen, D. W. An Analysis of the Molecular Origin of Osmolyte-Dependent Protein Stability. Protein Sci. 2007, 16, 733-743.
31. King, L. S.; Kozono, D.; Agre, P. FromStructure toDisease: the Evolving Tale of Aquaporin Biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004,5, 687-698.
32. Murad, S. A Computer Simulation of the Classic Experiment on Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 7271-7271.
33. Murad, S.; Powles, J. G.; Holtz, B. Osmosis and Reverse Osmosis in Solutions: Monte Carlo Simulations and van der Waals One-Fuild Theory. Mol. Phys. 1995, 86, 1473-1483.
34. Paritosh, F.; Murad, S. Molecular Simulations of Osmosis and Reverse Osmosis in Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions. AIChE J. 1996,42, 2984-2986.
35. Kalra, A.; Garde, S.; Hummer, G. Osmotic Water Transport through Carbon Nanotube Membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 10175-10180.
36. Zhu, F.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Schulten, K. Collective Diffusion Model for Water Permeation through Microscopic Channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 224501.
37. Powles, J. G.; Murad, S.; Holtz, B. A Novel Osmotic Pressure Route to the Activity Coefficient of a Molecule in a Solution. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 245, 178-182.
38. Robinson, R. A.; Stokes, R. H. Electrolyte Solutions; Dover Publications, Inc: Mineola, NY, 2002.
39. + Binding Sites with Two Different Mechanisms. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 377, 804-818.
40. Jorgensen, W.L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J.D.; Impey, R.W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926-935.
41. MacKerell, J. A. D.; Banavali, N.; Foloppe, N. Development and Current Status of the CHARMM Force Field for Nucleic Acids. Biopolymers 2000, 56, 257-265.
42. Brooks, B. R.; Bruccoleri, R. E.; Olafson, B. D.; States, D. J.; Swaminathan, S.; Karplus, M. CHARMM - A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 187-217.
43. Brooks, B. R.; Brooks, C. L., III; Mackerell, A. D., Jr.; Nilsson, L.; Petrella, R. J.; Roux, B.; Won, Y.; Archontis, G.; Bartels, C.; Boresch, S.; Caflisch, A.; Caves, L.; Cui, Q.; Dinner, A. R.; Feig, M.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Hodoscek, M.; Im, W.; Kuczera, K.; Lazaridis, T.; Ma, J.; Ovchinnikov, V.; Paci, E.; Pastor, R. W.; Post, C. B.; Pu, J. Z.; Schaefer, M.; Tidor, B.; Venable, R. M.; Woodcock, H. L.; Wu, X.; Yang, W.; York, D. M.; Karplus, M. CHARMM: The Biomolecular Simulation Program. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 1545-1614.
44. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulations of Liquid; Oxford University Press, Inc.: New York, 1987.
45. Ryckaert, J. P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equation of Motions of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes. J. Comput. Chem. 1977, 23, 327-341.
46. Hoover, W. H. Canonical Dynamics: Equilibirum Phase-Space Distributions. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1695-1697.
47. Feller, S. E.; Zhang, Y. H.; Pastor, R. W.; Brooks, B. R. Constant Pressure Molecular Dynamics Simulation - The Langevin Piston Method. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 4613-4621.
48. Phillips, J. C.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R. D.; Kale, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable Molecular Dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1781-1802.
49. Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle-Mesh Ewald - An N log(N) Method for Ewald Sums in Large Systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 10089-10092.
50. Im, W.; Roux, B. Ions and Counterions in a Biological Channel: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation of OmpF Porin from Escherichia coli in an Explicit Membrane with 1 M KCl Aqueous Salt Solution. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 319, 1177-1197.
51. Roux, B. Valence Selectivity of the Gramicidin Channel: A Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation Study. Biophys. J. 1996, 71, 3177-3185.
52. Stone, A. International Series of Monographs in Chemistry: The Theory of Intermolecular Forces; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1996; Vol. 32.
53. Patra, M.; Karttunen, M. Systematic Comparison of Force Fields for Microscopic Simulations of NaCl in Aqueous Solutions: Diffusion, Free Energy of Hydration, and Structural Properties. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 678-689.