The role of CD4+ T cells in the induction of contact hypersensitivity to mercury in a murine model

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 30-33

  Sumiwi, Yustina A A ^a   Soesatyo, Marsetyawan H N E ^a   Sosroseno, Wihaskoro ^b  

^a GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

^b AIMST UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

CD4; Contact; Hypersensitivity; Mercury; Murine

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; MERCURIC CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; IMMUNITY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SWELLING;

ADOPTIVE TRANSFER; ANIMALS; CD4-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; DERMATITIS, CONTACT; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EAR; EDEMA; FEMALE; MERCURIC CHLORIDE; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; POTASSIUM DICHROMATE; SKIN; TIME FACTORS;

MURINAE; MUS;

EID: 77149130903     PISSN: 15569527     EISSN: 15569535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/15569520903496746     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Czarnobilska E, Obtulowicz K, Dyga W, Wsolek-Wnek K, Spiewak R. Contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis among school children and teenagers with eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2009;60:264-269
2. Wohrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Götz M, Jarisch R. Patch testing in children, adults, and the elderly: influence of age and sex on sensitization patterns. Pediatr Dermatol 2003;20:119-123
3. Lee JY, Yoo JM, Cho BK, Kim HO. Contact dermatitis in Korean dental technicians. Contact Dermatitis 2001;45:13-16
4. Kanerva L, Lahtinen A, Toikkanen J, Forss H, Estlander T, Susitaival P, et al. Increase in occupational skin diseases of dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40:104-108
5. Olumide YM, Akinkugbe AO, Altraide D, Mohammed T, Ahamefule N, Ayanlowo S, et al. Complications of chronic use of skin lightening cosmetics. Int J Dermatol 2008;47:344-353
6. Baines VK, Loomba K, Loomba A, Basins R. Mercury sensitisation: review, relevance and a clinical report. Br Dent J 2008;205:373-378
7. Sosroseno W. The immunology of nickel-induced allergic contact dermatitis. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 1995;13:173-181
8. Gober MD, Gaspari AA. Allergic contact dermatitis. Curr Dir Autoimmun 2008;10:1-26.
9. Vreeburg KJ, De Groot K, Van Hoogstraten IM, Von Blomberg BM, Scheper RJ. Successful induction of allergic contact dermatitis to mercury and chromium in mice. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1991;96:179-183
10. Sumiwi YAA, Sosroseno W, Soesatyo MHNE. The induction of mercury-induced allergic contact dermatitis in rats [in Indonesian]. B I Ked 1998;30:1-5.
11. Sosroseno W, Bird PS, Gemmell E, Seymour GJ. Role of CD4 and CD8 T-cells in the induction of oral tolerance to Actinomyces viscosus in mice. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2006;21:151-158
12. Cederbrant K, Hultman P. Characterization of mercuric mercury (Hg2)-induced lymphoblasts from patients with mercury allergy and from healthy subjects. Clin Exp Immunol 2000;121:23-30.
13. Mega H, Jiang WW, Takagi M. Immunohistochemical study of oral lichen planus associated with hepatitis C virus infection, oral lichenoid contact sensitivity reaction and idiopathic oral lichen planus. Oral Dis 2001;7:296-305.