Good Medical Practice: What are we trying to say? Textual analysis using tag clouds

Medical Education

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 316-322

  Gill, Deborah ^a   Griffin, Ann ^b  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;

EID: 77149127732     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03588.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. General Medical Council. Functions, Procedures and Disciplinary Jurisdiction. London : GMC 1963. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/archive/func- proced-and-dis-1963.pdf. [Accessed 23 August 2008.]
2. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London : GMC 1995 (1st edn), 1998 (2nd edn), 2001 (3rd edn). http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/archive/ index.asp. [Accessed 23 August 2008.]
3. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice, 4th edn. London : GMC 2006. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/current/index.asp. [Accessed 23 August 2008.]
4. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. Professional Conduct and Discipline - Fitness to Practise. London : GMC 1980. http://www.gmc-uk.org/ guidance/archive/index.asp. [Accessed 3 August 2008.]
5. Irvine D. Everyone is entitled to a good doctor. Med J Aust 2007 186 (5 256 261.
6. Pringle M. The Shipman Inquiry: implications for the public's trust in doctors. Br J Gen Pract 2000 50 (454 355 356.
7. Department of Health (Donaldson, L). Good Doctors, Safer Patients. Proposals to Strengthen the System to Assure and Improve the Performance of Doctors and to Protect the Safety of Patients. [Report by the Chief Medical Officer.] London : DoH 2006 1 202.
8. General Medical Council. How Good Medical Practice Applies to You. London : GMC 2006. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good-medical-practice/how-gmp- applies-to-you.asp. [Accessed 12 September 2008.]
9. Hafferty F. Professionalism and the socialisation of medical students. In : Cruess R, Cruess S, Steinert Y, eds. Teaching Professionalism. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press 2009 53 70.
10. Cruess R, Cruess S. Teaching medicine as a profession in the service of healing. Acad Med 1997 72 (11 941 952.
11. Sandars J, Schroter S. Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey. Postgrad Med J. 2007 83 : 759 762.
12. Wikipedia. Tag clouds. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag-clouds. [Accessed 12 July 2008.]
13. Turchin A, Kolatkar N, Pendergrass M, Kohane I. Computational analysis of non-adherence and non-attendance using the text of narrative physicians notes in the electronic medical record. Med Inform Internet Med 2007 32 (2 93 102.
14. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge : Policy Press 1991.
15. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. London : DoH 2000.
16. Ham C, Alberti KGMM. The medical profession, the public, and the government. BMJ 2002 324 (6 838 842.
17. Whitty G. Teacher professionalism in new times. J In-Service Educ 2000 26 (2 281 295.
18. Golder S, Huberman B. The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Information Dynamics Lab, HP Labs 2005. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0508082. [Accessed 1 July 2008.]