The Many Uses of Cancer Prediction Tools

Seminars in Oncology

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 20-22

  Kattan, Michael W ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER PREDICTION TOOL; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; INFORMED CONSENT; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77049104345     PISSN: 00937754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Lamont E.B., and Christakis N.A. To help them live their lives they way they want to. JAMA 290 (2003) 98-105
2. Kattan M. Comparative effectiveness: a table of expected benefits and harms. Med Decis Making 29 (2009) NP3-NP5
3. Nguyen C., and Kattan M. Development of a prostate cancer metagram: a solution to the dilemma of which prediction tool to use in patient counseling. Cancer 115 Suppl (2009) 3039-3045
4. Kattan M., and Marasco J. What is a real nomogram?. Semin Oncol. 37 (2009) 23-26
5. Brennan M., Kattan M., Klimstra D., and Conlon K. Prognostic nomogram for patients undergong resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 240 (2004) 293-298
6. Gonen M., and Weiser M. Whither TNM?. Semin Oncol. 37 (2009) xx
7. Ross P.L., Gerigk C., Gonen M., et al. Comparisons of nomograms and urologists' predictions in prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol. 20 (2002) 82-88
8. Specht M., Kattan M., Gonen M., Fey J., and Van Zee K. Predicting nonsentinel node status after positive sentinel lymph biopsy for breast cancer: clinicians versus nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol. 12 (2005) 654-659
9. Hogarth R.M. Judgement and choice: the psychology of decision Vol 2 (1987), Wiley, New York
10. Wang L., Hricak H., Kattan M., Chen H., Scardino P., and Kuriowa K. Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer; incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms. Radiology 238 (2006) 597-603
11. Vickers A., and Cronin A. Traditional statistical methods for evaluating prediction models are uninformative as to clinical value: towards a decision analytic framework. Semin Oncol. 37 (2009) 31-38
12. Bardia A., Loprinizi C., Grothey A., et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stage II and III colon cancer: comparison of two widely used prognostic calculators. Semin Oncol. 37 (2009) 39-47
13. Patrick R., Buccini L., and Kattan M. Prediction tools and informed consent. Semin Oncol. 37 (2009) 47-52
14. Devidas M., London W., and Anderson J. The use of central laboratories and remote electronic data capture to risk-adjust therapy for pediatric actue lymphoblastic leukemia and neuroblastoma. Semin Oncol. 37 (2009) 53-59
15. Epstein R. Digitisation and its discontents: future shock in predictive oncology. Semin Oncol. 37 (2009) 60-64
16. Hess K., and Wei C. Learning curves in classification with microarray data. Semin Oncol. 37 (2009) 65-68