Three- and four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography studies of the supraclavicular artery Island flap

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 525-531

  Chan, Jennifer W H ^a,b,c,d   Wong, Corrine ^a,b,c,d   Ward, Kenneth ^a,b,c,d   Saint Cyr, Michel ^a,b,c,d   Chiu, Ernest S ^a,b,c,d  

^a Southwestern Medical Center ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^c TULANE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^d Children's Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; FOUR DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEAD AND NECK TUMOR; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIES; CADAVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; FOUR-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 76949103607     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82e37     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kazanjian VH, Converse J. The Surgical Treatment of Facial Injuries. Baltimore, Md.: Williams & Wilkins; 1949.
2. Mathes SJ, Vasconez LO. The cervico-humeral flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61:7-12.
3. Lamberty BG, Cormack GC. Misconceptions regarding the cervico-humeral flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1983;36:60-63.
4. Blevins PK, Luce EA. Limitations of the cervicohumeral flap in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980; 66:220-224.
5. Pallua N, Machens HG, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A. The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1878-1884.
6. Pallua N, Magnus Noah E. The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: An optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:842-851.
7. Pallua N, Demir E. Postburn head and neck reconstruction in children with the fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:276-282.
8. Lamberty BGH. The supraclavicular axial patterned flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1979;32:207-212.
9. Abe M, Murakami G, Abe S, Sakakura I, Yajima I. Supraclavicular artery in Japanese: An anatomical basis for the flap using a pedicle containing a cervical, non-perforating cutaneous branch of the superficial cervical artery. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2000;77:149-154.
10. Saint-Cyr M, Schaverien M, Arbique G, Hatef D, Brown SA, Rohrich RJ. Three- and four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography and venography for the investigation of the vascular anatomy and perfusion of perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:772-780.
11. Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, Brown SA, Rohrich RJ. Three-and four-dimensional arterial and venous anatomies of the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1578-1587.
12. Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, Hatef D, Brown SA, Rohrich RJ. Three- and four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography and venography of the anterolateral thigh perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1685-1696.
13. Moon HK, Taylor GI. The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:815-832.
14. Alkureishi LW, Shaw-Dunn J, Ross GL. Effects of thinning the anterolateral thigh flap on the blood supply to the skin. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56:401-408.
15. Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ. The perforasome theory: Vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1529-1544.
16. Ma X, Zheng Y, Xia W, et al. An anatomical study with clinical application of one branch of the supraclavicular artery. Clin Anat. 2009;22:215-220.
17. Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: Indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:115-123.