LES of synthetic jets in boundary layer with laminar separation caused by adverse pressure gradient

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 845-858

  Ozawa, Tetsuya ^a   Lesbros, Samuel ^a   Hong, Guang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Flow control; Micro sensor; Numerical modeling; Synthetic jet actuator

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL; ADVERSE PRESSURE GRADIENT; COMPUTATIONAL DOMAINS; FORCING AMPLITUDES; FORCING FREQUENCIES; INITIAL STAGES; JET VELOCITIES; LAMINAR SEPARATION BUBBLE; LAMINAR SEPARATIONS; LOWER FREQUENCIES; NUMERICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; SEPARATION BUBBLE; SYNTHETIC JET ACTUATOR; SYNTHETIC JET ACTUATORS; SYNTHETIC JETS;

ACTUATORS; ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER; BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; FLOW CONTROL; JETS; LAMINAR BOUNDARY LAYER; LAMINAR FLOW; MICROSENSORS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PRESSURE GRADIENT; SEPARATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; WIND TUNNELS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 76949095156     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alam M., and Sandham N.D. Direct numerical simulation of 'short' laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment. J Fluid Mech 403 (2000) 223-250
2. Allan BG, Holt M, Packard, A. Simulation of a controlled airfoil with jets. NASA/CR-201750, ICASE Report No. 97-55; October 1977.
3. Gad-el-Hak M. Flow control: passive, active and reactive flow management (Section 8.10.2) (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. In: Galperin B., and Orzag S.A. (Eds). Large eddy simulation of complex engineering and geophysical flows (1993), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Gaster M. The structure and behaviour of laminar separation bubbles. A.R.C. R&M Report No. 3595; 1969.
6. Glezer A., and Amitay M. Synthetic jets. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 34 (2002) 503-529
7. Hatman A, Wang T. A prediction model for separated-flow transition. ASME paper, GT-29-237, ASME Turbo Expo '98', Stockholm, Sweden; 1998.
8. Hong G. Effectiveness of micro synthetic jet actuator enhanced by flow instability on controlling laminar separation caused by adverse pressure gradient. Sensors Actuators, Phys A 132 2 (2006) 607-615
9. Hong G, Lee C, Ha, QP, Mack ANF, Mallinson SG. Effectiveness of synthetic jets enhanced by instability of Tollmien-Schlichting waves. AIAA paper, 2002-2832; 2002.
10. Honohan AM, Amitay M, Glezer A. Aerodynamic control using synthetic jets. AIAA paper, 2000-2401; 2000.
11. Kral LD, Donovan JF, Cain AB, Cary AW. Numerical simulation of synthetic jet actuator. In: AIAA paper 97-1824, 28th AIAA fluid dynamics conference, Snowmass Village, CO; June 29-July 2, 1997.
12. Li Y., and Ming X. Control of two dimensional jets using miniature zero mass flux jets. Chin J Aeronaut 13 3 (2000) 129-133
13. Lilly D.K. A proposed modification of the germano subgrid scale closure method. Phys Fluids 4 (1992) 633-634
14. Lockerby D.A., and Carpenter P.W. Modeling and design of microjet actuation. AIAA J 42 2 (2004) 220-227
15. Ming X., Dai C., and Shi S. A new phenomenon of acoustic streaming. Acta Mech Sinica 7 3 (1991) 193-198
16. Mittal R., and Rampunggoon P. On the virtual aeroshaping effect of synthetic jets, brief communications. Phys Fluids 14 4 (2002) 1533-1536
17. Mittal R, Rampunggoon P, Udaykumar HS. Interaction of a synthetic jet with a flat plate boundary layer. AIAA paper, 2001-2773; 2001.
18. Na Y., and Moin P. Direct numerical simulation of a separated turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 374 (1998) 379-405
19. Ozawa T, Hong G, Mack ANF. CFD modelling of synthetic jets in a boundary layer at adverse pressure gradient. In: Proceedings of 5th Pacific symposium on flow visualisation and image processing (5PSFVIP), Daydream Island, Australia; 27-29th September, 2005.
20. Parekh D, Palaniswamy S, Goldberg U. Numerical simulation of separation control via synthetic jets. AIAA paper, 2002-3167; 2002.
21. Ravi BR, Mittal R, Najjar FM. Study of three-dimensional synthetic jet flow fields using direct numerical simulation, In: 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 5-8 January, 2004.
22. Redford JA, Johnson MW. Predicting transitional separation bubbles. In: Proc TURBOEXPO 2004, international gas turbine congress, Austria; 14-17 June, 2004.
23. Rist U. Instability and transition mechanisms in laminar separation bubbles, VKI/RTO-LS low reynolds number aerodynamics on aircraft including applications in emergency UAV technology, Rhoda-Saint-Gense, Belgium; 24-28 November, 2003.
24. Rist U. On instabilities and transition in laminar separation bubbles. In: Proc CEAS aerospace aerodynamics research conference, Cambridge, UK; 10-12 June, 2002.
25. Rizzetta DP, Visbal MR, Stanek MJ. Numerical investigation of synthetic jet flowfields. In: AIAA paper, 98-2910, 29th AIAA fluid dynamics conference, Albuquerque, NM; June 15-18, 1998.
26. Rumsey CL. Successes and challenges for flow control simulations. AIAA-2008-4313; 2008.
27. Sagaut P. Large eddy simulation for incompressible flow. 2nd ed. (2004), Springer
28. Seifert A, Theofilis, V, Joslin RD. Issues in active flow control: theory, simulation and experiment. AIAA paper, 2002-3277; 2002.
29. Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations, I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91 (1963) 96-99
30. Smith BL, Glezer A. Vectoring and small-scale motions effected in free shear flows using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA paper, 97-0213; 1997.
31. Wilson PG, Pauley LL. Two-dimensional large eddy simulation of a transitional separation bubble. In: Symp on separated and complex flows, ASME/JSME fluid engineering conf; 1995.
32. Wissink JG, Rodi W. DNS of transition in a laminar separation bubble. In: Castro IP, Hancock PE, editors. Advances in turbulence IX, proceedings of the ninth european turbulence conference, CIMNE; 2002.