Testing female receptiveness to novel or previous mating partners in a wolf spider

Behaviour

Volumn 147, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 383-395

  Coelho, Lorena ^a   Aisenberg, Anita ^a   Costa, Fernando G ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES BIOLÓGICAS CLEMENTE ESTABLE   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

Female re mating; Mate recognition; Monandry; Schizocosa malitiosa; Wolf spider

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE; LYCOSIDAE; SCHIZOCOSA;

EID: 76949090695     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: 1568539X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/000579509X12574308806317     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aisenberg, A. & Costa, F.G. (2005). Females mated without sperm transfer maintain high sexual receptivity in the wolf spider Schizocosa malitiosa. - Ethology 111: 545-558.
2. Aisenberg, A., Estramil, N., González, M., Toscano-Gadea, C. & Costa, F.G. (2008). Silk release by copulating Schizocosa malitiosa males (Araneae, Lycosidae): a bridal veil? -J. Arachnol. 36: 204-206.
3. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. -Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Andrade, M.C.B. & Banta, E.M. (2002). Value of male remating and functional sterility in redback spider.-Anim. Behav. 63: 857-870.
5. Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. (2000). The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. - Anim. Behav. 60: 145-164.
6. Arnqvist, G. &. Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual conflict. - Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
7. Austad, S.N. (1984). Evolution of sperm priority patterns in spiders.-In: Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (Smith, R.L., ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, p. 223-249.
8. Baruffaldi, L. &. Costa, F.G. (in press). Changes in male sexual responses from silk cues of female at different reproductive states in the wolf spider Schizocosa malitiosa. - J. Ethol. doi: 10.1007/s10164-009-0158-8.
9. Chapman, T., Liddle, L.F., Kalb, J.M., Wolfner, M.F. & Partridge, L. (1995). Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. - Nature 373: 241-244.
10. Costa, F.G. (1975). El comportamiento precopulatorio de Lycosa malitiosa Tullgren (Araneae: Lycosidae). -Rev. Brasil. Biol. 35: 359-368.
11. Costa, F.G. (1979). Análisis de la cópula y de la actividad postcopulatoria de Lycosa malitiosa Tullgren (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Rev. Brasil. Biol. 39(02): 361-376.
12. Danielson-François, A.M. & Bukowski, T.L. (2005). Female mating history influences copulation behaviour but not sperm release in the orb-weaving spider Tetragnatha versicolor (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). -J. Insect Behav. 18: 131-148.
13. Eberhard, W.G. (1985). Sexual selection and animal genitalia. - Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Eberhard,W.G. (1996). Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice.-Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. Eberhard, W.G., Huber, B.A., Rodríguez, R.L., Briceño, R.D., Salas, I. & Rodríguez, V. (1998). One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders.-Evolution 52: 415-431.
16. Elgar, M.A. (1998). Sperm competition and sexual selection in spiders and other arachnids. - In: Sperm competition and sexual selection (Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P., eds). Academic Press, London, p. 307-332.
17. Elgar, M.A. & Bathgate, R. (1996). Female receptivity and male mate-guarding in the jewel spider Gasteracantha minax Thorell (Araneidae). -J. Insect Behav. 9: 729-738.
18. Elgar, M.A., Champion De Crespigny, F.E. & Ramamurthy, S. (2003). Male copulation behaviour and the risk of sperm competition. - Anim. Behav. 66: 211-216.
19. Estramil, N. & Costa, F.G. (2007). Female sexual receptivity after partial copulations in the wolf spider (Schizocosa malitiosa). - J. Zool. 271: 148-153.
20. Fernández-Montraveta, C. & Ortega, J. (1990). Some aspects on the reproductive behaviour of Lycosa tarentula fasciiventris (Araneae, Lycosidae).- J. Arachnol. 18: 257-262.
21. González, M. & Costa, F.G. (2008). Persistence of sexual reluctance in mated females and the importance of regular copulations in a wolf spider.- Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 20: 115-124.
22. Hammer, Ø., Harper D.A. & Ryan, P.D. (2004). Past - Palaeontological Statistics version 1.24. Available online at http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past.
23. Helsdingen, P.J. (1965). Sexual behaviour of Lepthyphantes leprosus (Ohlert) (Araneida, Linyphiidae) with notes on the function of the genital organs. - Zool. Meded. 41: 15-42.
24. Herberstein, M.E., Schneider, J.M. & Elgar, M.A. (2002). Costs of courtship and mating in a sexually cannibalistic orb-web spider: female mating strategies and their consequences for males.- Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51: 440-446.
25. Huber, B.A. (2005). Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases. - Biol. Rev. 80: 363-385.
26. Jackson, R.R. (1980). The mating strategy of Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae, Salticidae): II. Sperm competition and the function of copulation. -J. Arachnol. 8: 217-240.
27. Maklakov, A.A., Bilde, T. & Lubin, Y. (2003). Vibratory courtship in a web-building spider: signaling quality or stimulating the female? - Anim. Behav. 66: 623-630.
28. Maklakov, A.A. & Lubin, Y. (2006). Indirect genetic benefits of polyandry in a spider with direct costs of mating.- Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 31-38.
29. Norton, S. & Uetz, G.W. (2005). Mating frequency in Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz) wolf spiders: evidence for a mating system with female monandry and male polygyny. - J. Arachnol. 33: 16-24.
30. Persons, M.H. & Uetz, G.W. (2005). Sexual cannibalism and mate choice decisions in wolf spiders: influence of male size and secondary sexual characters. - Anim. Behav. 69: 83-94.
31. Roberts, J.A. & Uetz, G.W. (2005). Information content of female chemical signals in the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata: male discrimination of reproductive state and receptivity.- Anim. Behav. 70: 217-223.
32. Rowe, L. (1994). The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders.-Anim. Behav. 48: 1049-1056.
33. Schneider, J.M. & Lubin, Y. (1998). Intersexual conflict in spiders. -Oikos 83: 496-506.
34. Simmons, L.W. (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. -Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
35. Simmons, L.W. (2005). The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 125-146.
36. Taylor, A.R., Persons. M.H. & Rypstra A.L. (2005). The effect of perceived predation risk on male courtship and copulatory behaviour in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae).- J. Arachnol. 33: 76-81.
37. Thrall, P., Antonovics, J., & Dobson, A. (2000). Sexually transmitted diseases in polygynous mating systems: prevalence and impact on reproductive success. - Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 267: 1555-1563.
38. Uhl, G., Schmitt S., & Schäfer, M.A. (2005). Fitness benefits of multiple mating versus female mate choice in the cellar spider (Pholcus phalangioides). - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59: 69-76.