Studies of shock/turbulent shear layer interaction using Large-Eddy Simulation

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 800-819

  Génin, Franklin ^a   Menon, Suresh ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compressible flows; Compressible mixing; LES; Shock isotropic turbulence interaction; Shock shear interaction; Subgrid models

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL SCHEME; COHERENT STRUCTURE; COMPRESSIBLE MIXING; HIGH-ORDER; INTEGRATED PRODUCTION; MIXING LAYERS; NUMERICAL SCHEME; PRESSURE FLUCTUATION; SHEAR-LAYER INTERACTIONS; SHOCK-CAPTURING; SHOCK/ISOTROPIC TURBULENCE INTERACTION; SUB-GRIDS; SUBGRID MODEL; TURBULENCE INTERACTIONS; TURBULENT ENERGIES; TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY; TURBULENT SHEAR LAYER; TURBULENT STATISTICS;

AMPLIFICATION; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; KINETIC ENERGY; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; MIXING; TURBULENCE;

ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER;

EID: 76949084940     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Andreopoulos Y., Agui J.H., and Briassulis G. Shock wave-turbulence interactions. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32 (2000) 309-345
2. Barre S., Alem D., and Bonnet J.P. Experimental study of a normal shock/homogeneous turbulence interaction. AIAA J 34 5 (1996) 968-974
3. Agui J.H., Briassulis G., and Andreopoulos Y. Studies of interactions of a propagating shock wave with decaying grid turbulence: velocity and vorticity fields. J Fluid Mech 524 (2005) 143-195
4. Hannappel R., and Friedrich R. Direct numerical simulation of a Mach 2 shock interacting with isotropic turbulence. Appl Sci Res 54 (1995) 205-221
5. Lee S., Lele S.K., and Moin P. Interaction of isotropic turbulence with shock waves: effect of shock strength. J Fluid Mech 340 (1997) 225-247
6. Mahesh K., Lele S.K., and Moin P. The influence of entropy fluctuations on the interaction of turbulence with a shock wave. J Fluid Mech 334 (1997) 353-379
7. Jamme S., Cazalbou J., Torres F., and Chassaing P. Direct numerical simulation of the interaction between a shock wave and various types of isotropic turbulence. Flow Turb Combust 68 3 (2002) 227-268
8. Lele S.K., and Larsson J. Shock-turbulence interaction: what we know and what we can learn from peta-scale simulations. J Phys: Conf Ser 180 (2009) 012032 10pp
9. Sesterhenn J., Dohogne J.-F., and Friedrich R. Direct numerical simulation of the interaction of isotropic turbulence with a shock wave using shock-fitting. C R Mecanique 333 (2005) 87-94
10. Jamme S, Crespo M, Chassaing P. Direct numerical simulation of the interaction between a shock wave and anisotropic turbulence. AIAA 2005-4886.
11. Menon S. Shock-wave-induced mixing enhancement in scramjet combustors. AIAA 89-0104.
12. Brummund U, Nuding JR. Interaction of a compressible shear layer with shock waves - an experimental study. AIAA 97-0392.
13. Parent B., and Sislian J.P. Hypersonic mixing enhancement by compression at a high convective Mach number. AIAA J 42 4 (2004) 787-795
14. Kim J.-H., Yoon Y., Jeung I.-S., Huh H., and Choi J.-Y. Numerical study of mixing enhancement by shock waves in model scramjet engine. AIAA J 41 6 (2003) 1074-1080
15. Drummond JP, Mukunda HS. A numerical study of mixing enhancement in supersonic reacting flow fields. AIAA 88-3260.
16. Shau Y.R., Dolling D.S., and Choi K.Y. Organized structure in a compressible turbulent shear layer. AIAA J 31 8 (1993) 1398-1405
17. Buttsworth D.R. Interaction of oblique shock waves and planar mixing regions. J Fluid Mech 306 (1996) 43-57
18. Garnier E., Sagaut P., and Deville M. Large eddy simulation of shock/homogeneous turbulence interaction. Comput Fluids 31 (2002) 245-268
19. Dubois T., Domaradzki J.A., and Honein A. The subgrid-scale estimation model applied to large eddy simulations of compressible turbulence. Phys Fluids 14 (2002) 1781-1801
20. Adams N.A., and Shariff K. A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems. J Comput Phys 127 (1996) 27-51
21. Pirozzoli S. Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. J Comput Phys 178 (2002) 81-117
22. Hill D.J., and Pullin D.I. Hybrid tuned center-difference-WENO method for large eddy simulations in the presence of strong shocks. J Comput Phys 194 (2004) 435-450
23. Vreman B. Direct and large-eddy simulation of the compressible turbulent mixing layer. PhD thesis, Universiteit Twente; 1997.
24. Gordon S., and McBride B.J. Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications vol. 1311 (1994), NASA Reference Publication, NASA
25. Fureby C., and Moller S.I. Large-eddy simulations of reacting flows applied to bluff-body stabilized flames. AIAA J 33 (1995) 2339
26. Ristorcelli J.R. A pseudo-sound constitutive relationship for the dilatational covariances in compressible turbulence. J Fluid Mech 347 (1997) 37-70
27. Kim W.-W., Menon S., and Mongia H.C. Large eddy simulations of a gas turbine combustor flow. Combust Sci Technol 143 (1999) 25-62
28. Dussauge J-P. Compressible turbulence of supersonic flows: actions and interactions. In: Proceedings of the symposium turbulence and interactions, Porquerolles, France; May 29-June 02.
29. Menon S., and Patel N. Subgrid modeling for simulation of spray combustion in large-scale combustors. AIAA J 44 4 (2006) 709-723
30. Nelson CC, Menon S. Unsteady simulations of compressible spatial mixing layers. AIAA paper 98-0786.
31. Srinivasan S, Girgis B, Menon S. Large-eddy simulation of a combustion powered actuator. AIAA paper 2008-4680.
32. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second order sequel to Godunov's method. J Comput Phys 32 (1979) 101-136
33. Colella P., and Woodward P. The piecewise-parabolic method for hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys 54 (1984) 174-201
34. Toro E.F., Spruce M., and Speares W. Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL Riemann solver. Shock Waves 4 (1994) 25-34
35. Einfeldt B. On Godunov-type methods for gas dynamics. SIAM J Numer Anal 25 2 (1988) 294-318
36. Poinsot T., and Lele S. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flow. J Comput Phys 101 (1992) 104-129
37. Lee S., Lele S.K., and Moin P. Simulation of spatially evolving turbulence and the applicability of Taylor's hypothesis in compressible flow. Phys Fluids 4 (1992) 1521
38. 2 shear coaxial injector. AIAA paper 2008-5030.
39. Shu C.-W., and Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J Comput Phys 83 (1989) 32
40. Inoue O., and Hattori Y. Sound generated by shock-vortex interactions. J Fluid Mech 380 (1999) 81-116
41. Dosanjh D.S., and Weeks T.M. Interaction of a starting vortex as well as a vortex street with a traveling shock wave. AIAA J 3 2 (1965) 216-223
42. Ellzey J.L., Henneke M.R., Picone J.M., and Oran E.S. The interaction of a shock with a vortex: shock distortion and the production of acoustic waves. Phys Fluids 7 1 (1995) 172-184
43. Moin P., Squires W., Cabot W., and Lee S. A dynamic sub-grid scale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport. Phys Fluids 3 11 (1991) 2746-2757
44. Slessor M.D., Zhuang M., and Dimotakis P.E. Turbulent shear-layer mixing: growth-rate compressibility scaling. J Fluid Mech 414 (2000) 35-45
45. Goebel S.G., and Dutton J.C. Experimental study of compressible turbulent mixing layers. AIAA J 29 (1991) 538-546
46. Gaviglio J., Dussauge J.-P., Debieve J.-F., and Favre A. Behavior of a turbulent flow, strongly out of equilibrium, at supersonic speeds. Phys Fluids 20 10 (1977) S179-S192