A survey of functional living and social support in patients with cancer;Kanserli bireylerin fonksiyonel durumlari ve algiladiklari sosyal desteǧin incelenmesi

Turk Onkoloji Dergisi

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 132-139

  Dedeli, Özden ^a   Fadiloǧlu, Çiçek ^b   Uslu, Rüçhan ^c  

^a CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c EGE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cancer; Functional living; Social support

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CANCER CENTER; CANCER PATIENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL RECORD; SEX RATIO; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); WELLBEING;

EID: 76849114577     PISSN: 13007467     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abeloff MD, Armitage JO, Niederhuber JE. Clinical oncology. 3rd ed., USA: Elsevier Inc; 2004. p. 535-583.
2. Onat H, Mandel MN (editörler). Kanser hastasina yaklaşim. Tani, tedavi, takipte sorunlar. İzmir: Nobel Tip Kitabevleri; 2002.
3. Yarbro CH, Frogge HM, Goodman M, Groenwald SL, (editors). Cancer nursing principles and practice. 5th ed. London: Jones and Barlett Publishers; 2006. p. 352-486.
4. Uyer M, Uslu R, Yildirim-Kuzeyli Y (editörler). Kanser ve palyatif bakim. İzmir: Meta Basim Matbaacilik Hizmetleri; 2006.
5. Fadiloǧlu ç (editör). Kronik hastaliklarda bakim I. İzmir: İnertip Tibbi Yayincilik & Bilgisayar; 2002.
6. Fadiloǧlu Ç (editör). Kronik hastaliklarda bakim II. İzmir: İnertip Tibbi Yayincilik & Bilgisayar; 2003.
7. Bektaş-Aydin H, Akdemir N. Kanserli bireylerde fonksiyonel yaşam _dolčeǧinin gečerlilik ve güvenilirliǧi. MN Dahili Tip Bilimleri 2006;1(5-6):371-80.
8. Eylen B. Kanser hastasi sosyal destek ölçeǧi'nin geçerlik, güvenirlik ve faktör yapisi üzerine bir çalişma Uluda-cag Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2002;15(1):109-17.
9. Bottomley A. The cancer patient and quality of life. Oncologist 2002;7(2):120-5.
10. Malhotra V, Perry MC. Functional problems in patient with cancer. Available at: http://patients.uptodate.com/topic.asp?file=genl_onc/4620 (set: 20/04/2007).
11. Bektaş-Aydin H, Akdemir N. Kanserli bireylerde fonksiyonel durumun deǧerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2006; 26:488-99.
12. Given CW, Given BA, Stommel M. The impact of age, treatment, and symptoms on the physical and mental health of cancer patients. A longitudinal perspective. Cancer 1994;74(7 Suppl):2128-38.
13. Kizilci S. Kemoterapi alan kanserli hastalar ve yakinlarinin yaşam kalitesini etkileyen faktörler. C.Ü. Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 1999;3(2):18-26.
14. Kroenke CH, Rosner B, Chen WY, Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Holmes MD. Functional impact of breast cancer by age at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(10):1849-56.
15. Dansuk R, Aǧargün M, Kars B, Aǧargün HP, Turan C, Ünal O. Jinekolojik kanserli hastalarin psikososyal özelliklerinin deǧerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst 2002;12:142-7.
16. Landmark BT, Strandmark M, Wahl A. Breast cancer and experiences of social support. In-depth interviews of 10 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Scand J Caring Sci 2002;16(3):216-23.
17. Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Schernhammer ES, Holmes MD, Kawachi I. Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(7):1105-11.
18. Erdman RA, Horstman L, van Domburg RT, Meeter K, Balk AH. Compliance with the medical regimen and partner's quality of life after heart transplantation. Qual Life Res 1993;2(3):205-12.
19. Gümüs-Babacan A. Meme kanserinde psikososyal sorunlar ve destekleyici girişimler. Meme Saǧli-cagi Dergisi 2006; 2(3):108-14.
20. Schweizer KJ, Leimeister MJ, Krcmar H. The role of virtual communities for the social network of cancer patients. Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Acapulco, Mexico August 4th-6th, 2006.