Decomposing and distributing configuration problems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2443 LNAI, Issue , 2002, Pages 81-90

  Magro, Diego ^a   Torasso, Pietro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

BOUNDNESS; CONSTRAINT LANGUAGE; DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUE; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; REPRESENTATION FORMALISMS; SEQUENTIAL APPROACH; SUB-PROBLEMS; TWO-COMPONENT;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 76849083444     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46148-5_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. R. Dechter. Enhancement schemes for constraint processing: backjumping, learning, and cutset decomposition. Artificial Intelligence, 41:273-312, 1990.
2. A. Felfernig, G. Friedrich, D. Jannach, and M. Zanker. Distributed configuring. In Proc. IJCAI-01 Configuration WS, pages 18-24, 2001.
3. G. Fleischanderl, G. E. Friedrich, A. Haselböck, H. Schreiner, and M. Stumptner. Configuring large systems using generative constraint satisfaction. IEEE Intelligent Systems, (July/August 1998):59-68, 1998.
4. G. Friedrich and M. Stumptner. Consistency-based configuration. In AAAI-99,Workshop on Configuration, 1999.
5. G. Gottlob, N. Leone, and F. Scarcello. A comparison of structural csp decomposition methods. Artificial Intelligence, 124:243-282, 2000.
6. D. Magro and P. Torasso. Description and configuration of complex technical products in a virtual store. In Proc. ECAI 2000 Configuration WS, pages 50-55, 2000.
7. D. Magro and P.Torasso. Supporting product configuration in a virtual store. LNAI, 2175:176-188, 2001.
8. D. Magro and P. Torasso. Problem decomposition in configuration. In Proc. ECAI 2002 Configuration WS (to appear), 2002.
9. D. L. McGuinness and J. R. Wright. An industrial-strength description logic-based configurator platform. IEEE Intelligent Systems, (July/August 1998):69-77, 1998.
10. S. Mittal and B. Falkenhainer. Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. In Proc. of the AAAI 90, pages 25-32, 1990.
11. D. Sabin and E.C. Freuder. Configuration as composite constraint satisfaction. In Proc. Artificial Intelligence and Manufacturing. Research Planning Workshop, pages 153-161, 1996.
12. D. Sabin and R. Weigel. Product configuration frameworks - a survey. IEEE Intelligent Systems, (July/August 1998):42-49, 1998.
13. T. Soininen, I. Niemelä, J. Tiihonen, and R. Sulonen. Unified configuration knowledge representation using weight constraint rules. In Proc. ECAI 2000 Configuration WS, pages 79-84, 2000.
14. M. Veron and M. Aldanondo. Yet another approach to ccsp for configuration problem. In Proc. ECAI 2000 Configuration WS, pages 59-62, 2000.