Hemodialysis adequacy: A review

Dialysis and Transplantation

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 20-22

  Mehta, Ankit N ^a   Fenves, Andrew Z ^a  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

UREA;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; DIETARY INTAKE; FLOW RATE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY CLEARANCE; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN INTAKE; PROTEIN METABOLISM; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; UREA KINETIC MODELING;

EID: 76749144282     PISSN: 00902934     EISSN: 19326920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dat.20392     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Kolff WJ, Berk HTJ, ter Welle M, van der Ley AJW, van Dijk EC, van Noordwijk J. The artificial kidney: a dialyzer with a great area. Acta Med Scand. 1944;117:121-134.
2. Murray G, Delorme E, Thomas N. Artificial kidney. BMJ. 1949;ii:887-891.
3. Daugirdas JT. Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKt/V, and ePCRn. Adv Renal Replace Ther. 1995;2:295-304.
4. Tattersall JE, DeTakats D, Chamney P, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. The post-hemodialysis rebound: predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int. 1996;50:2094-2102.
5. Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Zimmerman DL. Predicting treatment dose for novel therapies using urea standard Kt/V. Semin Dial. 2004;17:142-145.
6. Perl J, Bargman JM. The importance of residual kidney function for patients on dialysis: a critical review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53:1068-1081.
7. Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Depner TA, Chumlea C, Rocco MJ, Chertow GM: Anthropometrically estimated total body water volumes are larger than modeled urea volume in chronic hemodialysis patients: effects of age, race, and gender. Kidney Int. 2003;64:1108-1119.
8. Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy, update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48(Suppl 1):S2-90.
9. Sargent JA. Control of dialysis by a single-pool urea model: the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int. 1983;23(Suppl 13); S19-S25.
10. Gotch FA, Sargent JA: A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int 28: 526-534, 1985.
11. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, et al, Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:2010-2019.
12. Held PJ, Levin NW, Bovbjerg RR, Pauly MV, Diamond LH. Mortality and duration of hemodialysis treatment. JAMA. 1991;265:871-875.
13. Port FK, Ashby VB, Dhingra RK, Roys EC, Wolfe RA. Dialysis dose and body mass index are strongly associated with survival in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:1061-1066.
14. Saran R, Bragg-Gresham JL, Levin NW, et al. Longer treatment time and slower ultrafiltration in hemodialysis: associations with reduced mortality in the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1222-1228.
15. European Best Practice Guidelines Expert Group on Hemodialysis, European Renal Association. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(Suppl 7):16-31.
16. Kjellstrand CM, Buoncristiani U, Ting G, et al. Short daily haemodialysis: survival in 415 patients treated for 1006 patient-years. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:3283-3289.
17. Johansen KL, Zhang R, Huang Y, et al. Survival and hospitalization among patients using nocturnal and short daily compared to conventional hemodialysis: a USRDS study. Kidney Int. 2009;76:984-990.