Monte Carlo modeling of the fiber curliness effect on percolation of conductive composites

Applied Physics Letters

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Ma, H M ^a   Gao, X L ^a   Tolle, T Benson ^b  

^a Texas AandM University   (United States)

^b AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDUCTIVE COMPOSITES; CURVED FIBERS; ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE; FIBER ASPECT RATIO; MONTE CARLO MODEL; MONTE CARLO MODELING; PERCOLATION THRESHOLDS; RANDOM NETWORK; SHAPED FIBERS; SIMULATION RESULT; STRAIGHT FIBERS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D);

ASPECT RATIO; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PERCOLATION (COMPUTER STORAGE); PERCOLATION (FLUIDS); PERCOLATION (SOLID STATE); PRESSURE DROP; SOLVENTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

FIBERS;

EID: 76749127209     PISSN: 00036951     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3309590     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. D. S. McLachlan, M. Blaszkiewicz, and R. E. Newnham, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 0002-7820 73, 2187 (1990). 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb07576.x
2. A. Bunde and W. Dieterich, J. Electroceram. 1385-3449 5, 81 (2000). 10.1023/A:1009997800513 (Pubitemid 32067971)
3. S. Kirkpatrick, Rev. Mod. Phys. 0034-6861 45, 574 (1973). 10.1103/RevModPhys.45.574
4. G. E. Pike and C. H. Seager, Phys. Rev. B 0163-1829 10, 1421 (1974). 10.1103/PhysRevB.10.1421
5. H. M. Ma and X. -L. Gao, Polymer 0032-3861 49, 4230 (2008). 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.07.034
6. E. Domany and W. Kinzel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 47, 5 (1981). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.5
7. C. Moore and M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 1063-651X 62, 7059 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.7059 (Pubitemid 32033182)
8. G. Hansen, SAMPE J. 0091-1062 41, 24 (2005).
9. K. Li, X. -L. Gao, J. C. Fielding, and T. Benson Tolle, J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 1546-1955 6, 494 (2009). 10.1166/jctn.2009.1060
10. N. Wagner, I. Balberg, and D. Klein, Phys. Rev. E 1063-651X 74, 011127 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011127 (Pubitemid 44156719)
11. C. Li and T. -W. Chou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 0003-6951 90, 174108 (2007). 10.1063/1.2732201 (Pubitemid 46748430)
12. Y. B. Yi, L. Berhan, and A. M. Sastry, J. Appl. Phys. 0021-8979 96, 1318 (2004). 10.1063/1.1763240
13. F. Dalmas, R. Dendievel, L. Chazeau, J. -Y. Cavailĺ, and C. Gauthier, Acta Mater. 1359-6454 54, 2923 (2006). 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.028 (Pubitemid 43792478)
14. L. Berhan and A. M. Sastry, Phys. Rev. E 1063-651X 75, 041121 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.041121 (Pubitemid 46686350)
15. I. Balberg, N. Binenbaum, and N. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 52, 1465 (1984). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1465
16. T. Natsuki, M. Endo, and T. Takahashi, Physica A 0378-4371 352, 498 (2005). 10.1016/j.physa.2004.12.059
17. S. K. Park and K. W. Miller, Commun. ACM 0001-0782 31, 1192 (1988). 10.1145/63039.63042
18. S. L. Anderson, SIAM Rev. 0036-1445 32, 221 (1990). 10.1137/1032044
19. G. S. Fishman, Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications (Springer, New York, 1996).
20. D. Toker, D. Azulay, N. Shimoni, I. Balberg, and O. Millo, Phys. Rev. B 0163-1829 68, 041403 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.041403
21. D. M. Bigg, Polym. Eng. Sci. 0032-3888 19, 1188 (1979). 10.1002/pen.760191610
22. M. Foygel, R. D. Morris, D. Anez, S. French, and V. L. Sobolev, Phys. Rev. B 0163-1829 71, 104201 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.104201 (Pubitemid 40781285)