Sensitivity analysis of Takagi-Sugeno-Kang rainfall-runoff fuzzy models

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 41-55

  Jacquin, A P ^a   Shamseldin, A Y ^b  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENT; ERROR ANALYSIS; MODEL TEST; NONLINEARITY; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; SEASONALITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WETTABILITY;

EID: 76749120626     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-13-41-2009     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. B́ardossy, A. Bronstert, A., and Merz, B.: 1-, 2- and 3-dimensional modelling of water movement in the unsaturated soil matrix using a fuzzy approach, Adv.Water Resour., 18(4), 237-251, 1995.
2. B́ardossy, A. and Disse, M.: Fuzzy Rule-Based Models for Infiltration, Water Resour. Res., 29(2), 373-382, 1993.
3. B́ardossy, A., Mascellani, G., and Franchini, M.: Fuzzy unit hydrograph, Water Resour. Res., 42(2), W02401, doi:10.1029/2004WR003751, 2006.
4. Beven, K. J.: Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 360 pp., 2001.
5. Castaings, W., Dartus, D., Honnorat, M., Le Dimet, F. X., Loukili, Y., and Monnier, J.: Automatic differentiation: a tool for variational data assimilation and adjoint sensitivity analysis for flood modelling, in: Automatic Differentiation: Applications, Theory, and Tools, edited by: Bücker, H. M., Corliss, G., Hovland, P., Naumann, U., and Norris, B., Springer, Chicago, 249-262, 2005.
6. Chan, K., Tarantola, S., Saltelli, A., and Sobol, I. M.: Variancebased methods, in: Sensitivity Analysis, edited by: Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M., JohnWiley & Sons, Chichester, 167-197, 2000.
7. Cukier, R. I., Fortuin, C. M., Shuler, K. E., Petschek, A. G., and Schaibly, J. H.: A Study of the Sensitivity of Coupled Reaction Systems to Uncrtainties in Rate Coefficients: I Theory, J. Chem. Phys., 59(8), 3873-3878, 1973.
8. Cukier, R. I., Levine, H. B., and Shuler, K. E.: Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems, J. Comput. Phys., 26, 1-42, 1978.
9. Demicco, R. and Klir, G.: Fuzzy Logic in Geology, Academic Press, Amsterdam, 347 pp., 2004.
10. Dou, X.,Wouldt,W., and Bogardi, I.: Fuzzy rule-based approach to describe solute transport in the unsaturated zone, J. Hydrol., 220, 74-85, 1999.
11. European Union Joint Research Centre: SIMLAB: Simulation Environment for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis (version 2.2), Applied Statistics Sector, Institute for Systems, Informatics and Safety, European Union Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy, 2004.
12. Fieberg, J. and Jenkings, K. J.: Assessing uncertainty in ecological systems using global sensitivity analyses: a case example of simulated wolf reintroduction effects on elk, Ecol. Model., 187, 259-280, 2005.
13. Francos, A., Elorzab, F. J., Bouraouia, F., Bidoglioa, G., and Galbiatia, L.: Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models: understanding the model behaviour in hydrological studies at the catchment scale, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 205-218, 2003.
14. Gupta, V. K. and Sorooshian, S.: The automatic calibration of conceptual catchment models using derivative-based optimization algorithms, Water Resour. Res., 21(4), 473-485, 1985.
15. Homma, T. and Saltelli, A.: Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of model output, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 52, 1-17, 1996.
16. Hornberger, G. M. and Spear, R. C.: An approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems, J. Environ. Manage., 12, 7-18, 1981.
17. Hundecha, Y. and B́ardossy, A.: Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model, J. Hydrol., 292, 281-295, 2004.
18. Hundecha, Y., B́ardossy, A., and Theisen, H.-W.: Development of a fuzzy logic-based rainfall-runoff model, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 46(3), 363-376, 2001.
19. Jacquin, A. P. and Shamseldin, A. Y.: Development of rainfallrunoff models using Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy inference systems, J. Hydrol., 329, 154-173, 2006.
20. Jacquin, A. P. and Shamseldin, A. Y.: Development of a possibilistic method for the evaluation of predictive uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modelling, Water Resour. Res., 43(4), W04425, doi:10.1029/2006WR005072, 2007. (Pubitemid 46799531)
21. Kanso, A., Chebboa, G., and Tassina, B.: Application of MCMCGlobal sensitivity analysis method for model calibration to urban runoff quality model, in: Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, edited by: Hanson, K. M. and Hemez, F. M., Los Alamos National Laboratory, 17-26, available at: http://library.lanl. gov, 2005.
22. McIntyre, N. R.,Wagener, T., Wheater, H., and Chapra, S. C.: Riskbased modelling of surface water quality: a case study of the Charles River, Massachussetts, J. Hydrol., 274, 225-247, 2003.
23. Mein, R. G. and [yellow], B. M.: Sensitivity of optimized parameters in watershed models, Water Resour. Res., 14(2), 299-303, 1978.
24. Mertens, J., Madsen, H., Kristensen, M., Jacques, D., and Feyen, J.: Sensitivity of soil parameters in saturated zone modelling and the relation between effective, laboratory and in situ estimates, Hydrol. Process., 19(8), 1611-1633, doi:10.1002/hyp.5591, 2005. (Pubitemid 40815536)
25. Morris, M. D.: Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments, Technometrics, 33(2), 161-1074, 1991.
26. Nandakumar, N. and Mein, R. G.: Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrologic effects of land-use change, J. Hydrol., 192, 211-232, 1997.
27. Nash, J. E.: The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph, IASH Publication, 45(3), 114-118, 1957.
28. Nash, J. E. and Foley, J. J.: Linear models of rainfall-runoff systems, in: Rainfall-runoff relationships, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rainfall-Runoff Modeling, Mississippi State University, USA, May 1981, 51-66, 1982.
29. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I - A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290, 1970.
30. O'Connor, K. M.: River flow forecasting, in: River Basin Modelling for Flood Risk Mitigation, edited by: Knight, D. W. and Shamseldin A. Y., Taylor & Francis, London, 197-213, 2005.
31. Özelkan, E. C. and Duckstein, L.: Fuzzy conceptual rainfall-runoff models, J. Hydrol., 253, 41-68, 2001.
32. Özelkan, E. C., Galambosi, A., Duckstein, L., and Bárdossy, A.: A multi-objective fuzzy classification of large scale atmospheric circulation patterns for precipitation modelling, Appl. Math. Comput., 91, 127-142, 1998.
33. Pappenberger, F., Beven, K. J., Ratto, M., and Matgen, P.: Multimethod global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models, Adv. Water Resour., 31(1), 1-14, 2008.
34. Pongracz, R., Bartholy, J., and Bogardi, I. Fuzzy rule-based prediction of monthly precipitation, Phys. Chem. Earth Pt. B, 26(9), 663-667, 2001.
35. Ratto, M., Young, P. C., Romanowicz, R., Pappenberger, F., Saltelli, A., and Pagano, A.: Uncertainty, sensitivity analysis and the role of data based mechanistic modeling in hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1249-1266, 2007, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1249/2007/.
36. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., and Tarantola, S.: Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 292 pp., 2008.
37. Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., and Campolongo, F.: Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modelling, Stat. Sci., 15(4), 377-395, 2000.
38. Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., and Ratto, M.: Sensitivity analysis in practice: A guide to assessing scientific models, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 219 pp., 2004.
39. Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., and Chan, K.: A quantitative, model independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output, Technometrics, 41(1), 39-56, 1999.
40. Seibert, J.: Regionalization of parameter of a conceptual rainfallrunoff model, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 98-99, 279-293, 1999.
41. Sobol, I. M.: Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models, Mathematical Modelling and Computational Experiments, 1(4), 407-414, 1993.
42. Sorooshian, S. and Gupta, V. K.: Model calibration, in: Conceptual Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by: Singh, V. P., Water Resources Publications, Colorado, 23-67, 1995.
43. Spear, R. C. and Hornberger, G. M.: Eutrophication in Peel Inlet II: Identification of critical uncertainties via generalised sensitivity analysis, Water Resour. Res., 14, 43-49, 1980.
44. Sugeno, M. and Kang, G. T.: Structure identification of fuzzy model, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 28, 15-33, 1988.
45. Takagi, T. and Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control, IEEE T. Syst. Man Cyb., SMC-15(1), 116-132, 1985.
46. Tang, Y., Reed, P.,Wagener, T., and vanWerkhoven, K.: Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 793-817, 2007, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/793/2007/.
47. Vernieuwe, H., Georgieva, O., De Baets, B., Pauwels, V. R. N., Verhoest, N. E. C., and De Troch, F. P.: Comparison of datadriven Takagi-Sugeno models of rainfall-discharge dynamics, J. Hydrol., 302, 173-186, 2005.
48. Wagener, T., Boyle, D. P., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: A framework for development and application of hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 13-26, 2001, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst- sci.net/5/13/2001/.
49. Wagener, T. and Kollat, J.: Numerical and visual evaluation of hydrological and environmental models using the Monte Carlo analysis toolbox, Environ. Modell. Softw., 22(7), 1021-1033, 2007.
50. Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Identification and evaluation of watershed models, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., American Geophysical Union, Washington, 29-47, 2002.
51. Wang, X., Frankenberger, J. R., and Kladivko, E. J.: Uncertainties in DRAINMOD predictions of subsurface drain flow for and Indiana silt loam using the GLUE methodology, Hydrol. Process., 20(14), 3069-3084, doi:10.1002/hyp.6080, 2006. (Pubitemid 44404691)
52. van Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Tang, Y.: Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01429, doi:10.1029/2007WR006271, 2008. (Pubitemid 351304154)
53. Xiong, L. and O'Connor, K. M.: Analysis of the response surface of the objective function by the optimum parameter curve: How good can the optimum parameter values be?, J. Hydrol., 234, 187-207, 2000.
54. Yu, P.-S., and Yang, T. C.: Fuzzy multi-objective function for rainfall-runoff model calibration, J. Hydrol., 238, 1-14, 2000.
55. Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy Sets, Inform. Control, 8(3), 338-353, 1965.
56. Zehe, E., Becker, R., B́ardossy, A. and Plate, E. Uncertainty of simulated catchment runoff response in the presence of threshold processes: Role of initial soil moisture and precipitation, J. Hydrol., 315, 183-202, 2005.
57. Zehe, E. and Blöschl, G.: Predictability of hydrologic response at the plot and catchment scales: The role of initial conditions, Water Resour. Res., 40(10),W10202, doi:10.1029/2003WR002869, 2004. (Pubitemid 39568795)
58. Zehe, E., Singh, A. K., and B́ardossy, A.: Modelling of monsoon rainfall for a mesoscale catchment in North-West India I: assessment of objective circulation patterns, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 797-806, 2006, *http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/797/2006/. (Pubitemid 44673536)