The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Characterising public policies on CSR in Europe

Policy Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 49-72

  Steurer, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Business self regulation; Business government relations; Business society relations; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); New governance; Public policies on CSR; Societal co regulation; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

CORPORATE STRATEGY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; POLICY MAKING; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; STATE ROLE; STATE-BUSINESS RELATIONS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EUROPE;

EID: 76749096406     PISSN: 00322687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-009-9084-4     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Aaronson, S. A. (2002). How the Europeans got a head start on policies to promote global corporate responsibility. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9(4), 356-367. doi: 10. 1016/S1066-7938(02)00107-0.
2. Albareda, L., et al. (2006). The government's role in promoting corporate responsibility: A comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 386-400.
3. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perrini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Drivers and responses, in: business ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 17, 347-363.
4. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391-407. doi: 10. 1007/s10551-007-9514-1.
5. Andrews, R. N. L. (1998). Environmental regulation and business 'self-regulation'. Policy Sciences, 31, 177-197. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1004377715029.
6. Arts, B., & van Tatenhove, J. (2004). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the 'old' and 'new' policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37(3), 339-356. doi: 10. 1007/s11077-005-0156-9.
7. Barkemeyer, R. (2007). Beyond compliance-below expectations? Cross-border CSR, development and the UN global compact. Corporate Responsibility Research Conference, 15-17 July 2007, University of Leeds. http://www. crrconference. org/downloads/crrc2007barkemeyer. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
8. Barth, R., Wolff, F., & Schmitt, K. (2007). CSR between rhetoric and reality: Analysing the contribution of CSR to the achievement of EU policy goals. Ökologisch Wirtschaften, 4, 30-34.
9. Bartle, I., & Vass, P. (2007). Self-regulation within the regulatory state: Towards a new regulatory paradigm? Public Administration, 85(4), 885-905. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9299. 2007. 00684. x.
10. Bemelmans-Videc, M., Rist, R., & Vedung, E. (1997). Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. New York: Transaction Publishers.
11. Berger, G., Steurer, R., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2007). Raising awareness for CSR in EU member states: Overview of government initiatives and selected cases. Final report to the high-level group on CSR. http://www. sustainability. eu/pdf/csr/CSR%20Awareness%20Raising_final%20report_31%20May%2007. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
12. Bertelsmann, S., & GTZ. (2007): The CSR navigator: Public policies in Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe. http://www. unglobalcompact. org/docs/news_events/9. 1_news_archives/2007_10_24/CSR_Navigator_short_final. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
13. Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Weller, P. (2003a). Comparative governance: Prospects and lessons. Public Administration, 81(1), 191-210.
14. Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Weller, P. (2003b). Traditions of governance: Interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration, 81(1), 1-17.
15. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295. doi: 10. 1177/000765039903800303.
16. Christian Aid. (2004). Behind the mask: The real face of corporate social responsibility. http://www. globalpolicy. org/socecon/tncs/2004/0121mask. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
17. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1998). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. In: M. B. E. Clarkson (Ed.), The corporation and its stakeholders: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 243-273). Toronto: University of Toronto Press; also in: Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 92-117.
18. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1998), also in: Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 92-117.
19. Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 131-140. doi: 10. 1111/1540-6210. 00274.
20. Cragg, W., & Greenbaum, A. (2002). Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 319-335. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1016523113429.
21. Croci, E. (Ed.). (2008). The handbook of environmental voluntary agreements: Design, implementation and evaluation issues. Berlin: Springer.
22. de la Cuesta, G. M., & Martinez, V. C. (2004). Fostering corporate social responsibility through public initiative: From the EU to the Spanish case. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 275-293.
23. Danish Government. (2008). Action plan for corporate social responsibility. http://www. eogs. dk/graphics/Samfundsansvar. dk/Dokumenter/Action_plan_CSR. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
24. DEFRA. (2006). Procuring the future. Sustainable procurement national action plan: Recommendations form the sustainable procurement task force, DEFRA. http://www. defra. gov. uk/sustainable/government/documents/full-document. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
25. DEFRA. (2007): UK government sustainable procurement action plan, DEFRA. http://www. defra. gov. uk/sustainable/government/documents/SustainableProcurementActionPlan. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
26. Donahue, J. D. (2004). On collaborative governance. Working Paper of the Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative. http://www. hks. harvard. edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_2_donahue. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
27. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130-141. doi: 10. 1002/bse. 323.
28. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100.
29. Employment, D. G. Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: National public policies in the European Union. http://ec. europa. eu/employment_social/publications/2004/ke1103005_en. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
30. European Commission. (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility; Green Paper. http://ec. europa. eu/employment_social/publications/2001/ke3701590_en. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
31. European Commission. (2002). Communication from the commission concerning corporate social responsibility: A business contribution to sustainable development; COM(2002) 347 final. http://trade. ec. europa. eu/doclib/docs/2006/february/tradoc_127374. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
32. European Commission. (2003). Integrated product policy: Building on environmental life-cycle thinking, COM(2003) 302 final. http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2003/com2003_0302en01. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
33. European Commission. (2004). Buying green! A handbook on environmental public procurement. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec. europa. eu/environment/gpp/pdf/buying_green_handbook_en. pdf.
34. European Commission. (2006). Implementing the partnership for growth and jobs: Making Europe a pole of excellence on corporate social responsibility; communication from the Commission; COM(2006) 136 final. http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2006/com2006_0136en01. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
35. European Council. (2000). Presidency conclusions-Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March 2000, DOC/00/8. http://ue. eu. int/en/Info/eurocouncil/index. htm Accessed 4 October 2003.
36. European Council. (2006). Renewed EU sustainable development strategy; 10917/06. http://ec. europa. eu/sustainable/docs/renewed_eu_sds_en. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
37. Eurosif. (2006). European SRI study 2006. http://www. eurosif. org/media/files/eurosif_sristudy_2006_complete. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
38. Fox, T., Ward, H., & Howard, B. (2002). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: A baseline study. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. http://www. iied. org/pubs/pdf/full/16014IIED. pdf.
39. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 122-126.
40. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205. doi: 10. 2307/259074.
41. Gamble, A. (2000). Economic governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy (pp. 110-137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Haufler, V. (2001). A public role for the private sector: Industry self-regulation in a global economy. Washington: Brookings Institution.
43. Henderson, D. (2001a). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
44. Henderson, D. (2001b). The case against 'corporate social responsibility'. Policy, 17(2), 28-32.
45. Holgaard, J. E., & Jørgensen, T. H. (2005). A decade of mandatory environmental reporting in Denmark. European Environment, 15(6), 362-373.
46. Hood, C. (1983). Using bureaucracy sparingly. Public Administration, 61, 197-208. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9299. 1983. tb00513. x.
47. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O'Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38-52.
48. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1993). Patterns of policy choice. Policy Studies Review, 12, 3-24. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1541-1338. 1993. tb00505. x.
49. Jann, W. (2003). State, administration and governance in Germany: Competing traditions and dominant narratives. Public Administration, 81(1), 95-118. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9299. 00338.
50. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437. doi: 10. 2307/258852.
51. Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., Zito, A. R., & Brückner, L. (2003). European governance and the transfer of' 'new' environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) in the European Union. Public Administration, 81(3), 555-574. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9299. 00361.
52. Joseph, E. (2002). Promoting corporate social responsibility: Is marked-based regulation sufficient? New Economy, 9/2, 96-101.
53. Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance, Governance, 15(1), 41-63.
54. Kolk, A., & van der Veen, M. (2002). Dilemmas of balancing organizational and public interests: How environment affects strategy in Dutch main ports. European Management Journal, 20(1), 45. doi: 10. 1016/S0263-2373(01)00113-X.
55. Konrad, A., Martinuzzi, A., & Steurer, R. (2008). When business associations and a Federal Ministry jointly consult civil society: A CSR policy case study on the development of the CSR Austria guiding vision. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 270-280.
56. Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance. London: Sage.
57. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
58. Lascoumes, P., & Le Gales, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments: From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20, 1-21. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1468-0491. 2007. 00342. x.
59. Lepoutre, J., Dentchev, N., & Heene, A. (2007). Dealing with uncertainties when governing CSR policies. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 391-408. doi: 10. 1007/s10551-006-9214-2.
60. Liston-Heyes, C., & Ceton, G. C. (2007). Corporate social performance and politics. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Spring, 95-108.
61. Lozano, J. M., Albareda, L., & Ysa, T. (2008). Governments and corporate social responsibility: Public policies beyond regulation and voluntary compliance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
62. Mathis, A. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and public policy-making: Perspectives, instruments and consequences. Twente: University of Twente.
63. McCrudden, C. (2007). Buying social justice: Equality, procurement, and legal change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127. doi: 10. 2307/259398.
65. Mellahi, K., & Wood, G. (2003). The role and potential of stakeholders in hollow participation: Conventional stakeholder theory and institutional alternatives. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 183-202. doi: 10. 1111/1467-8594. 00160.
66. Midttun, A. (2005). Policy making and the role of government: Realigning business, government and civil society. Corporate Governance, 5, 159-174.
67. Midttun, A., Gautesen, K., et al. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 369-385.
68. Mitchell, R. K., et al. (1998). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. In M. B. E. Clarkson, et al. (Eds.), The corporation and its stakeholders: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 275-303). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
69. Mol, A. P. J., Lauber, V., & Liefferink, D. (Eds.). (2000). The voluntary approach to environmental policy: Joint environmental policy-making in Europe: Joint environmental approach to environmental policy-making in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Moon, J. (2002). The social responsibility of business and new governance. Government and Opposition, 37(3), 385-408. doi: 10. 1111/1477-7053. 00106.
71. Moon, J. (2005). An explicit model of business-society relations. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 51-66). Berlin: Springer.
72. Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15, 296-306.
73. Moon, J., & Vogel, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility, government and civil society. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Mörth, U. (2009). The market turn in EU governance-the emergence of public-private collaboration. Governance, 22(1), 99-120. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1468-0491. 2008. 01423. x.
75. Nelson, J. (2004). The public role of private enterprise: Risks, opportunities and new models of engagement. Working Paper of the Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative. http://www. hks. harvard. edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_1_nelson. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
76. OECD. (2008). Overview of selected initiatives and instruments relevant to corporate social responsibility. OECD-ILO Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility, Paris.
77. Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
78. Porter, T., & Ronit, K. (2006). Self-regulation as policy process: The multiple and criss-crossing stages of private rule-making. Policy Sciences, 39, 41-72. doi: 10. 1007/s11077-006-9008-5.
79. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
80. Rasche, A., et al. (2008). Corporations as political actors-a report on the First Swiss Master Class in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 151. doi: 10. 1007/s10551-007-9418-0.
81. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, XLIV, 652-667. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9248. 1996. tb01747. x.
82. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
83. Riess, B., & Welzel, C. (2006). Partner staat? CSR-Politik in Europa. Gübersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. http://www. bertelsmann-stiftung. de/bst/de/media/xcms_bst_dms_17243_17244_2. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
84. Rittberger, B., & Richardson, J. (2003). Old wine in new bottles: The commission and the use of environmental policy instruments. Public Administration, 81(3), 575-606. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9299. 00362.
85. Rubin, A. (2008). Political views and corporate decision making. The Case of Corporate Social Responsibility, 43, 337-360.
86. Schmiedeknecht, M., & Wieland, J. (2007). ISO 26000 as a network discourse. In J. Wieland (Ed.), Governanceethik und Diskursethik-ein zwangloser Diskurs. Marburg: Metropolis.
87. Scholtens, B., Cerin, P., et al. (2008). Sustainable development and socially responsible finance and investing. Sustainable Development, 16(3), 137-140.
88. Steurer, R. (forthcoming). Soft instruments, few networks: How 'new governance' materialises in public policies on CSR across Europe.
89. Steurer, R., Berger, G., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2007). Sustainable public procurement in EU member states: Overview of government initiatives and selected cases. Final Report to the EU High-Level Group on CSR. http://www. sustainability. eu/pdf/csr/Sustainable%20Public%20Procurement%20in%20EU%20Member%20State s_Final%20Report. pdf. Accessed on 30 April 2009.
90. Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263-281. doi: 10. 1007/s10551-005-7054-0.
91. Steurer, R., Margula, S., & Berger, G. (2008a). Public policies on CSR in EU member states: Overview of government initiatives and selected cases on awareness raising for CSR, sustainable public procurement and socially responsible investment. ESDN Quarterly Report June 2008. http://www. sd-network. eu/?k=quarterly%20reports& report_id=9.
92. Steurer, R., Margula, S., & Martinuzzi, A. (2008b). Socially responsible investment in EU member states: Overview of government initiatives and SRI experts' expectations towards governments. Final report to the EU high-level group on CSR. http://www. sustainability. at/pdf/csr/Socially%20Responsible%20Investment%20in%20EU%20Member%20Stat es_Final%20Report. pdf.
93. Steurer, R., & Martinuzzi, A. (Eds.) (2007). Sustainable development strategies in Europe: Taking stock 20 years after the Brundtland Report. European Environment Special Issue, 17(3), 147-214.
94. Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R., & Mitchell, J. (Eds.). (1991). Markets, hierarchies and networks: The coordination of social life. London: Sage.
95. Utting, P. (2005). Rethinking business regulation: From self-regulation to social control. http://www. unrisd. org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpPublications)/F02AC3DB0ED406E0C12570A10029BEC8 ?OpenDocument& panel=relatedinformation. Accessed 30 April 2009.
96. van Asselt, H., van der Grijp, N., & Oosterhuis, F. (2006). Greener public purchasing: opportunities for climate-friendly government procurement under WTO and EU rules. Climate Policy, 6, 217-229.
97. von Werder, A., Talaulicar, T., & Kolat, G. L. (2005). Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code: An empirical analysis of the compliance statements by German listed companies. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 178-187.
98. Ward, H. (2004). Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: Taking stock. Washington, D. C.: World Bank.
99. Zadek, S. (2001). Third generation corporate citizenship: Public policy and business in society. London: AccountAbility.
100. Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December, 125-132.