Preoperative briefing in the operating room: Shared cognition, teamwork, and patient safety

Chest

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 443-449

  Einav, Yael ^a   Gopher, Daniel ^a   Kara, Itzik ^b   Ben Yosef, Orna ^b   Lawn, Margaret ^b   Laufer, Neri ^b   Liebergall, Meir ^b   Donchin, Yoel ^b  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; OPERATING ROOM; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TEAMWORK; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 76749086497     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: 19313543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-1732     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Roth EM, Christian CK, Gustafson M, et al. Using field observations as a tool for discovery: analyzing cognitive and collaborative demands in the operating room. Cognition, Technology, & Work. 2004;6(3):148-157.
2. Helmreich RL, Schaefer H. Team performance in the operating room. In: Bogner MS, ed. Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994:225-253.
3. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):377-384.
4. Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA. The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery. 1999;126(1):66-75.
5. Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery. 2003;133(6):614-621.
6. Lingard L, Espin S, Rubin B, et al. Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):340-346.
7. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). Universal protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong person surgery. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: JCAHO, 2007. Available at: www.jointcommission. org/PatientSafety/UniversalProtocol. Accessed June 2006.
8. Zohar E, Noga Y, Davidson E, Kantor M, Fredman B. Perioperative patient safety: correct patient, correct surgery, correct side - a multifaceted, cross-organizational, interventional study. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(2):443-447.
9. Vashdi DR, Bamberger PA, Erez M, et al. Briefing - debriefing: using a reflexive organizational learning model from the military to enhance the performance of surgical teams. Hum Resour Manage. 2007;46(1):115-142.
10. Makary MA, Mukherjee A, Sexton JB, et al. Operating room briefings and wrong-site surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):236-243.
11. Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):32-64.
12. Moray N. Mental models in theory and practice. In: Gopher D, Koriat A, eds. Attention and Performance XVII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:223-258.
13. Mao J, Benbasat I. The effects of contextualized access to knowledge on judgment. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2001;55(5):787-814.
14. Wickens CD, Hollands JG. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2000:69-108, 241-84.
15. Adams MJ, Tenney YJ, Pew RW. Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):85-104.
16. Salas E, Prince C, Baker DP, et al. Situation awareness in team performance: implications for measurements and training. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):123-136.
17. Rouse WB, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E. The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1992;22(6):1296-1308
18. Cannon-Bowers JE, Salas E, Converse S. Shared mental models in expert team decision-making. In: Castellan J, ed. Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993:228.
19. Regenbogen SE, Greenberg CC, Studdert DM, Lipsitz SR, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA. Patterns of technical error among surgical malpractice claims: an analysis of strategies to prevent injury to surgical patients. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):705-711.
20. Weinger MB, Slagle J, Jain S, Ordonez N. Retrospective data collection and analytical techniques for patient safety studies. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36(1-2):106-119.
21. Cook RI, Woods DD. Operating at the sharp end: The complexity of human error. In: Bogner MS, ed. Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994:255-310.
22. Ramanujam R, Goodman PS. Latent errors and adverse organizational consequences: a conceptualization. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2003;24(7):815-836.
23. Jones DG. Reducing situation awareness errors in air traffic control. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 1997:230-233.
24. Gopher D. Why it is not sufficient to study errors and incidents: human factors and safety in medical systems. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2004;38(5):387-391.
25. Rudolph JW, Repenning NP. Disaster dynamics: understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Adm Sci Q. 2002;47(1):1-30.
26. Perrow C. Normal Accidents: Living With High Risk Systems. New York: Basic Books; 1984.