Factors affecting appearance of stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) injury on apple

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 134-139

  Brown, Mark W ^a   Short, Brent D ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Apple; Stink bug; UV radiation; Wound response

Indexed keywords

CULTIVAR; FRUIT; INSECT; MATURATION; PEST DAMAGE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WOUNDING;

ANIMAL; APPLE; ARTICLE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FRUIT; HETEROPTERA; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; PARASITOLOGY; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

ANIMALS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FRUIT; HETEROPTERA; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MALUS; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

HEMIPTERA; MALUS X DOMESTICA; PENTATOMIDAE;

EID: 76649138966     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/EN09175     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Amiri, A., and G. Bompeix. 2005. Micro-wound detection on apple and pear fruit surfaces using sulfur dioxide. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 36: 51-59.
2. Ballare, C. L. 2003. Stress under the sun: spotlight on ultraviolet-B responses. Plant Physiol. 132: 1725-1727.
3. Brosché, M., and A. Strid. 2003. Molecular events following perception of ultraviolet-B radiation by plants. Physiol. Plantarum 117: 1-10.
4. Brown, M. W. 2003. Characterization of stink bug (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) damage in mid- and late-season apples. J. Agric. Urban. Entomol. 20: 193-202.
5. Brown, M. W., S. S. Miller, and K. S. Yoder. 2006. Stink bug (Pentatomidae) feeding preferences among apple cultivars. J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 60: 144-148.
6. Chao, W. S., Y. Gu, V. Pautot, E. A. Bray, and L. L. Walling. 1999. Leucine aminopeptidase RNAs, proteins, and activities increase in response to water deficit, salinity, and the wound signals systemin, methyl jasmonate, and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 120: 979-992.
7. Creelman, R. A., and J. E. Mullet. 1995. Jasmonic acid distribution and action in plants: regulation during development and response to biotic and abiotic stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92: 4114-4119.
8. Filonow, A. B. 2005. Wound type in apple fruits affects wound resistance to decay-causing fungi. J. Plant Pathol. 87: 233-238.
9. Frohnmeyer, H., and D. Staiger. 2003. Ultraviolet-B radiation-mediated responses in plants. Balancing damage and protection. Plant Physiol. 133: 1420-1428.
10. Glenn, D. M., E. Prado, A. Erez, J. McFerson, and G. J. Puterka. 2002. A reßective, processed-kaolin particle Film affects fruit temperature, radiation reßection, and solar injury in apple. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127: 188-193.
11. Hern, A., and S. Dorn. 2002. Induction of volatile emissions from ripening apple fruits infested with Cydia pomonella and the attraction of adult females. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 102: 145-151.
12. Howe, G. A. 2004. Jasmonates as signals in the wound response. J. Plant Growth Regul. 23: 223-237.
13. Howe, G. A., and C. A. Ryan. 1999. Suppressors of systemin signaling identify genes in the tomato wound response pathway. Genetics 153: 1411-1421.
14. Karban, R., and I. T. Baldwin. 1997. Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
15. Leskey, T. C., B. D. Short, S. E. Wright, and M. W. Brown. 2009. Diagnosis and variation in appearance of brown stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) injury on apple. J. Entomol. Sci. 44: 314-322.
16. Li, Ning, B. L. Parsons, D. Liu, and A. K. Mattoo. 1992. Accumulation of wound-inducible ACC synthase transcript in tomato fruit is inhibited by salicylic acid and polyamines. Plant Mol. Biol. 18: 477-487.
17. Mao, L., F. Lu, and G. Wang. 2007. Application of 1-methylcyclopropene reduces wound responses and maintains quality in fresh-cut apple. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 16: 111-115. (Pubitemid 46524584)
18. McPherson, J. E., and R. M. McPherson. 2000. Stink bugs of economic importance in America north of Mexico. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
19. Nielsen, A. L., and G. C. Hamilton. 2009. Seasonal occurrence and impact of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in tree fruit. J. Econ. Entomol. 102: 1133-1140.
20. O'Donnell, P. J., C. Calvert, R. Atzorn, C. Wasternack, H.M.O. Leyser, and D. J. Bowles. 1996. Ethylene as a signal mediating the wound response of tomato plants. Science 274: 1914-1917.
21. Panizzi, A. R., J. E. McPherson, D. G. James, M. Javahery, and R. M. McPherson. 2000. Stink bugs (Pentatomidae), pp. 421-474. In C. W. Schaefer and A. R. Panizzi (eds.), Heteroptera of economic importance. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
22. Parsons, B. L., and A. K. Mattoo. 1991. Wound-regulated accumulation of specific transcripts in tomato fruit: interactions with fruit development, ethylene and light. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 453-464.
23. Rudisill, A. E. 2008. Pennsylvania tree fruit production guide. (http://tfpg.cas.psu.edu/default.htm).
24. Saniewski, M., J. Ueda, and K. Miyamoto. 1999. Interaction of ethylene with jasmonates in the regulation of some physiological processes in plants, pp. 173-180. In A. K. Kanellis, C. Chang, H. Klee, A. B. Bleecker, J. C. Pech, and D. Grierson (eds.), Biology and biotechnology of the plant hormone ethylene II. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
25. SAS Institute. 2001. Version 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
26. Walling, L. L. 2000. The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J. Plant Growth Regul. 19: 195-216.