Percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses using 25-gauge needles

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 70-74

  Erturk, Sukru Mehmet ^a   Silverman, Stuart ^b   Mortele, Koenraad ^b   Lamba, Ramit ^a,b   Tuncali, Kemal ^a   Vansonnenberg, Eric ^a,c   Cibas, Edmund ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

22 Gauge; 25 Gauge; Abdominal masses; Biopsy; Fine needle aspiration biopsy

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL MASS; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAFETY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ABDOMINAL NEOPLASMS; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 76649137826     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-008-9492-5     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. SG Silverman TE Deuson N Kane, et al. 1998 Percutaneous abdominal biopsy: cost-identification analysis Radiology 206 429 435 1:STN:280: DyaK1c7hvVCjsg%3D%3D 9457196
2. PM Bret A Fond G Casola, et al. 1986 Abdominal lesions: a prospective study of clinical efficacy of percutaneous fine-needle biopsy Radiology 159 345 346 1:STN:280:DyaL287nvVCjtQ%3D%3D 3515416
3. SM Stockberger Jr WT Ambrosius MG Khamis, et al. 1999 Abdominal and pelvic needle aspiration biopsies: can we perform them well when using small needles? Abdom Imaging 24 321 328 10.1007/s002619900508 10390551 (Pubitemid 29309971)
4. GH Mostbeck GR Wittich K Derfler, et al. 1989 Optimal needle size for renal biopsy: in vitro and in vivo evaluation Radiology 173 819 822 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FkslKkuw%3D%3D 2813792
5. JG Andriole JR Haaga RB Adams C Nunez 1983 Biopsy needle characteristics assessed in the laboratory Radiology 148 659 662 1:STN:280:DyaL3s3nsVGquw%3D%3D 6878680
6. RP Lieberman GR Hafez AB Crummy 1982 Histology from aspiration biopsy: Turner needle experience AJR 138 561 564 1:STN:280:DyaL387ls1OisQ%3D%3D 7039272
7. JJ Pagani 1983 Biopsy of focal hepatic lesions. Comparison of 18 and 22 gauge needles Radiology 147 673 675 1:STN:280:DyaL3s7psFyjsA%3D%3D 6844603
8. E Van Sonnenberg BW Goodacre GR Wittich, et al. 2003 Image-guided 25-gauge needle biopsy for thoracic lesions diagnostic feasibility and safety Radiology 227 414 418 10.1148/radiol.2272011416 (Pubitemid 36514755)
9. DA Schenk SL Chambers S Derdak, et al. 1993 Comparison of the Wang 19-gauge and 22-gauge needles in the mediastinal staging of lung cancer Am Rev Respir Dis 147 1251 1258 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3kvFWqug%3D%3D 8484639
10. J Kreula 1990 Effect of sampling technique on specimen size in fine needle aspiration biopsy Invest Radiol 25 1294 1299 1:STN:280: DyaK3M7itlSisA%3D%3D 2279908
11. WF Dahnert MH Hoagland UM Hamper YS Erozan JC Peirce 1992 Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of abdominal lesions: diagnostic yield for different needle tip configurations Radiology 185 263 268 1:STN:280:DyaK38zps1ynug%3D%3D 1523321
12. ME Bernardino 1984 Percutaneous biopsy AJR 142 41 45 1:STN:280: DyaL2c7gtFWlug%3D%3D 6606963
13. V Tangpricha BJ Chen NC Swan, et al. 2001 Twenty-one-gauge needles provide more cellular samples than twenty-five-gauge needles in fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid but may not provide increased diagnostic accuracy Thyroid 11 973 976 10.1089/105072501753211055 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MnmvFGhtw%3D%3D 11716046
14. I Green SZ Ali EA Allen MF Zakowski 1997 A spectrum of cytomorphologic variations in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Fine-needle aspiration findings in 19 cases Cancer 81 40 44 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970225)81:1<40::AID- CNCR9>3.0.CO;2-K 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3lsFWqsQ%3D%3D 9100540 (Pubitemid 28275326)
15. ED Pisano LL Fajardo DJ Caudry, et al. 2001 Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V Radiology 219 785 792 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ps1yqsQ%3D%3D 11376270