The impact of information quantity and strength of relationship between training set and validation set on accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values

African Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 438-442

  Saatchi, M ^a   Miraei Ashtiani, S R ^a   Nejati Javaremi, A ^a   Moradi Shahrebabak, M ^a   Mehrabani Yeghaneh, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

GEBVS; Generation distance; Genomic selection; Training set; Validation set

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENETIC TRAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN GENOME; INHERITANCE; MALE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 76649134463     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16845315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF (2007). Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124: 362-368.
2. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, Deroos APW, Veerkamp RF (2008). Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotype. Genetics, 178: 553-561.
3. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA (2007). Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124: 369-376.
4. Goddard ME (2009). Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximization of long term response. Genetica 136:245-257.
5. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ (2007). Genomic selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124: 323-330.
6. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007). The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177: 2389-2397.
7. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME (2009). Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 433-443.
8. König S, Simianer H, Willam A (2009). Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 382-391.
9. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 157: 1819-1829.
10. Muir WM (2007). Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124: 342-55.
11. Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson JP (1997). Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. J. Anim. Sci. 75: 1738-1745.
12. Schaeffer LR (2006). Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 123: 218-223.
13. th World Congress on Genet. Appl. to Livestock Prod. August 13-18, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
14. Willumsen TM, Janss L, Lund MS (2009). The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 126: 3-13.