The rate of missed test results in an emergency department an evaluation using an electronic test order and results viewing system

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 37-43

  Callen, J ^a   Paoloni, R ^b   Georgiou, A ^a   Prgomet, M ^a   Westbrook, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Department of Geriatric Medicine   (Australia)

Author keywords

CPOE; Diagnostic tests; Health care quality improvement; Information systems; Patient safety

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DUTY TO RECONTACT; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL ERROR; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; STATISTICS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEACHING HOSPITAL;

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; DUTY TO RECONTACT; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; MEDICAL ORDER ENTRY SYSTEMS; MICROBIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; NEW SOUTH WALES; PATIENT DISCHARGE; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES; WORKFLOW;

EID: 76649133021     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3414/ME09-01-0011     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
2. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
3. Murff HJ, Gandhi TK, Karson AK, et al. Primary care physician attitudes concerning follow-up of abnormal test results and ambulatory decision support systems. Intern J Med Inform 2003; 71: 137-149.
4. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 121-128.
5. Cram P, Rosenthal GE, Ohsfeldt R, et al. Failure to recognize and act on abnormal test results: a case of screening bone densitometry. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31: 90-97.
6. Gandhi TK. Fumbled handoffs: one dropped ball after another. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 352-358.
7. Kuperman GJ, Teich JM, Tanasijevic MJ, et al. Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6: 512-522.
8. Poon EG, Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, et al. I wish I had seen this test result earlier! Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 2223-2228.
9. Singh H, Sethi S, Raber M, et al. Errors in cancer diagnosis: current understanding and future directions. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 5009-5018.
10. Bird S. Missing test results and failure to diagnose. Aust Fam Physician 2004; 33: 360-361.
11. Boohaker EA, Ward RE, Uman JE, et al. Patient notification and follow-up of abnormal test results: a physician survey. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 327-331.
12. Karcz A, Holbrook J, Burke MC, et al. Massachusetts emergency medicine closed malpractice claims: 1988-1990. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22: 553-559.
13. Osuch JR, Bonham VL, Morris LL. Primary care guide to managing a breast mass: a legal perspective on risk management. Medscape Womens Health 1998; 3: 3.
14. Meza JP, Webster DS. Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6: 1297-1300.
15. Callen JL, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. The effect of physicians' long-term use of CPOE on their test management work practices. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 643-652.
16. Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, et al. Differences in the quality of care for women with an abnormal mammogram or breast complaint. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15: 321-328.
17. Marcus AC, Crane LA, Kaplan CP, et al. Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies. Med Care 1992; 30: 216-230.
18. Marcus AC, Kaplan CP, Crane LA, et al. Reducing loss to follow-up among women with abnormal pap smears: results from a randomized trial testing an intensive follow-up protocol and economic incentives. Med Care 1998; 36: 397-410.
19. Poon EG, Haas JS, Puopolo AL, et al. Communication factors in the follow up of abnormal mammograms. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 316-323.
20. Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Willians S, et al. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 646-651.
21. Kilpatrick ES, Holding S. Use of computer terminals on wards to access emergency test results: a retrospective audit. BMJ 2001; 322: 1101-1103.
22. Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA 1994; 272: 1851-1857.
23. Stiell A, Forster AJ, Stiell IG, et al. Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes. Can Med Assoc J 2003; 169: 1023-1028.
24. Poon EG, Wang SJ, Gandhi TK, et al. Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient results manager. J Biomed Inform 2003; 36: 80-91.
25. Anderson GF, Frogner BK, Johns RA, et al. Health care spending and use of information technology in OECD countries. Health Aff 2006; 25: 819-831.
26. Cross M. Keeping the NHS electronic spine on track. BMJ 2006; 332: 656-658.
27. National Programme for Information Technology. National programme for information technology - benefits timeline 2004. http://wwwnpfitnhsuk/ publications/sha-comms-tk/all-images-and-docs/ benfits-timelinepdf (accessed March 2005).
28. Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, et al. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 299-308.
29. Collin S, Reeves B, Hendy J, et al. Implementation of computerised physician order entry (CPOE) and picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in the NHS: quantitative before and after study. BMJ 2008; 337: a939.
30. Westbrook J, Braithwaite J, Iedema R, et al. Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and socio-technical theory. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 746-755.
31. Hickner JM, Fernald DH, Harris DM, et al. Communicating critical test results: issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31: 81-89.
32. Singh H, Naik AD, Rao R, et al. Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 23: 489-494.
33. Keren R, Muret-Wagstaff S, Goldmann DA, et al. Notifying emergency department patients of negative test results: pitfalls of passive communication. Pediatr Emerg Care 2003; 19: 226-230.
34. Greenes DS, Fleisher GR, Kohane I. Potential impact of a computerized system to report late-arriving laboratory results in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000; 16: 313-315.
35. Bates DW, Leape LL. Doing better with critical test results. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31: 66-67.
36. Saxena S, Kempf R, Wilcox S, et al. Critical laboratory value notification: a failure mode effects and criticality analysis. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31: 495-506.
37. Hanna D, Griswold P, Leape LL et al. Communicating critical test results: safe practice recommendations. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31: 68-80.