Machinability evaluation in unreinforced and reinforced PEEK composites using response surface models

Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-18

  Davim, J Paulo ^a   Mata, Francisco ^b   Gaitonde, V N ^c   Karnik, S R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^c KLE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Cemented carbide (K10) tool; Cutting power; Polyetheretherketone (PEEK); Response surface methodology (RSM); Specific cutting force; Turning

Indexed keywords

CARBIDE TOOLS; CARBIDES; CUTTING; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; REINFORCEMENT; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TURNING;

CEMENTED CARBIDES; CUTTING FORCES; CUTTING POWER; MACHINABILITY EVALUATION; MECHANICAL AND TRIBOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELS; UNREINFORCED THERMOPLASTICS;

REINFORCED PLASTICS;

EID: 76649118111     PISSN: 08927057     EISSN: 15307980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0892705709093503     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Jahanmir, S., Ramulu, M. and Koshy, P. (1998). Machining of Ceramics and Composites, Marcel Dekker, New York.
2. Kim, D., Ramulu, M. and Doan, X. (2005). Influence of Consolidation Process on the Drilling Performance and Machinability of PIXA-M and PEEK thermoplastic composites, Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 18: 195-217.
3. Cogswell, F.N. (1992). Thermoplastic Aromatic Polymer Composites, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
4. Harsha, A.P. and Tewari, U.S. (2003). Two-Body and Three-Body Abrasive Wear Behaviour of Polyaryletherketone Composites, Polymer Testing, 22: 403-408.
5. Voss, H. and Friedrich, K. (1987). On the Wear Behaviour of Short-Fibre Reinforced PEEK Composites, Wear, 116: 1-18. (Pubitemid 17586151)
6. Davim, J.P. and Marques, N. (2001). Evaluation of Tribological Properties of Polymeric Materials for Hip Prosthesis Applications, Tribology Letters, 11: 91-94.
7. Davim, J.P., Reis, P., Lapa, V. and Antonio, C.C. (2003). Machinability Study on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Unreinforced and Reinforced (GF30) for Applications in Structural Components, Composite Structures, 62: 67-73.
8. Davim, J.P. and Reis, P. (2004). Machinability Study on Composite (Polyetheretherketone Reinforced with 30% Glass Fibre-PEEK GF 30) using Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) and Cemented Carbide (K20) Tools, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 23: 412-418.
9. Bhushan, B. (1999). Principles and Applications of Tribology, Wiley, New York.
10. Park, D.C., Lee, S.M., Kim, B.C., Kim, S.H. and Lee, D.G. (2006). Development of Heavy Duty Hybrid Carbon-Phenolic Hemispherical Bearings, Composite Structures, 73: 88-98.
11. Lee, S.M., Park, D.C., Kim, B.C. and Lee, D.G. (2006). Strength of Functionally Gradient Composite Hemispherical Bearings, Composite Structures, 73: 145-152.
12. Groover, M.P. (1996). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing Materials, Processes and Systems, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
13. Rahman, M., Ramakrishna, S. and Thoo, H.C. (1999). Machinability Study of Carbon/ PEEK composites, Machining Science and Technology, 3: 49-59.
14. Chambers, A., Bishop, G. (1995). The Drilling of Carbon Fibre Polymer Matrix, Composites Process Manufacturing, 3: 565-572.
15. Davim, J.P. and Mata, F. (2006). Physical Cutting Model of Polyetheretherketone Composites, Materials & Design, 27: 847-852.
16. Montgomery, D.C. (2003). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley, New York.