Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Value of CEUS

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 106-114

  Iezzi, R ^a   Cotroneo, A R ^b   Basilico, R ^b   Simeone, A ^a   Storto, M L ^b   Bonomo, L ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Computed tomography; Contrast enhanced ultrasonography; Endoleaks; Endovascular repair; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ECHO CONTRAST MEDIUM; SONOVUE;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST SPECIFIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT PERFUSION; HUMAN; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VASCULAR PATENCY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; STENTS; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;

EID: 76649116831     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-009-9526-7     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. RL Bush AB Lumsden TF Dodson, et al. 2001 Mid-term results after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm J Vasc Surg 33 2 suppl S70 S76 10.1067/mva.2001.111740 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7lslylsw%3D%3D 11174815
2. J May GH White R Waugh, et al. 2000 Comparison of first- and second-generation prostheses for endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a 6-year study with life table analysis J Vasc Surg 32 124 129 10.1067/mva.2000.105958 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czjs1OktA%3D%3D 10876213 (Pubitemid 30461160)
3. CK Zarins RA White KJ Hodgson D Schwarten TJ Fogarty 2000 Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial J Vasc Surg 32 90 107 10.1067/mva.2000.108278 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czjs1OksQ%3D%3D 10876210 (Pubitemid 30461157)
4. P Cuypers J Buth PL Harris E Gevers R Lahey 1999 Realistic expectations for patients with stent-graft treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results of a European multicentre registry Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 17 507 516 10.1053/ejvs.1999.0836 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzgslGgsA%3D%3D 10377023 (Pubitemid 29296751)
5. G Gilling-Smith J Brennan P Harris, et al. 1999 Endotension after endovascular aneurysm repair: definition, classification, and strategies for surveillance and intervention J Endovasc Surg 6 305 307 10.1583/1074-6218(1999) 006<0305:EAEARD>2.0.CO;2 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czkvFaiug%3D%3D 10893129
6. J Golzarian J Struyven HT Abada, et al. 1997 Endovascular aortic stent-grafts: transcatheter embolization of persistent perigraft leaks Radiology 202 731 734 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3gtlCmtg%3D%3D 9051026
7. J Gorich N Rilinger R Sokiranski, et al. 1999 Leakages after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms: classification based on findings at CT, angiography, and radiography Radiology 213 767 772 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c%2Fls1Ohtw%3D%3D 10580951
8. AB Lumsden RC Allen EL Chaikof, et al. 1995 Delayed rupture of aortic aneurysms following endovascular stent grafting Am J Surg 170 174 178 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80280-3 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzlvVClsQ%3D%3D 7631925
9. SR Vallabhaneni PL Harris 2001 Lessons learnt from the EUROSTAR registry on endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysm repair Eur J Radiol 39 34 41 10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00340-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzosFanuw%3D%3D 11439229 (Pubitemid 32611702)
10. MJ Bown G Fishwick, et al. 2004 The postoperative complications of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair J Cardiovascular Surg 45 335 347 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvls1eitQ%3D%3D
11. J Golzarian L Dussaussois HT Abada, et al. 1998 Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 329 331 1:STN:280:DyaK1czlslyiug%3D%3D 9694445
12. DJ Brenner EJ Hall 2007 Computer tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure N Engl J Med 357 22 2277 2284 10.1056/NEJMra072149 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVSlurfF 18046031 (Pubitemid 350190758)
13. KG Raman N Missig-Carrol T Richardson SC Muluk MS. Makaroun 2003 Color-flow duplex ultrasound versus computed tomographic scan in the surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair J Vasc Surg 38 645 651 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00909-1 14560207 (Pubitemid 37254786)
14. DT Sato CD Goff RT Gregory, et al. 1998 Endoleak after aortic stent graft repair: diagnosis by color duplex ultrasound scan versus computed tomography scan J Vasc Surg 28 657 663 10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70091-6 1:STN:280: DyaK1M%2FgtVajsg%3D%3D 9786261 (Pubitemid 28481220)
15. EA Henao MD Hodge DD Felkai, et al. 2006 Contrast-enhanced duplex surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: improved efficacy using a continuous infusion technique J Vasc Surg 43 259 264 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.09.045 16476596 (Pubitemid 43221915)
16. I Bargellini V Napoli P Petruzzi, et al. 2005 Type II lumbar endoleaks: hemodynamic differentiation by contrast-enhanced ultrasound scanning and influence on aneurysm enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair J Vasc Surg 41 10 18 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.037 15696037 (Pubitemid 40193333)
17. V Napoli I Bargellini SG Sardella, et al. 2004 Abdominal aortic aneurysm: contrast-enhanced US for missed endoleaks after endoluminal repair Radiology 233 217 225 10.1148/radiol.2331031767 15454621 (Pubitemid 39280977)
18. MF Giannoni G Palombo E Sbarigia, et al. 2003 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging for aortic stent-graft surveillance J Endovasc Ther 10 208 217 10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0208:CUIFAS>2.0.CO;2 12877601 (Pubitemid 36988591)
19. PJ Bendick PG Bove GW Long, et al. 2003 Efficacy of ultrasound scan contrast agents in the noninvasive follow-up of aortic stent grafts J Vasc Surg 37 2 381 385 10.1067/mva.2003.17 12563210 (Pubitemid 36236917)
20. K Wei DM Skyba C Firschke, et al. 1997 Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations J Am Coll Cardiol 29 5 1081 1088 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00029-6 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ksVChtQ%3D%3D 9120163 (Pubitemid 27149585)
21. RG McWilliams JM Martin D White, et al. 2002 Detection of endoleak with enhanced ultrasound imaging: comparison with biphasic computed tomography J Endovasc Ther 9 170 179 10.1583/1545-1550(2002)009<0170:DOEWEU>2.0.CO;2 12010096 (Pubitemid 34579046)
22. RG McWilliams JM Martin D White, et al. 1999 Use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair J Vasc Interv Radiol 10 1107 1114 10.1016/S1051-0443(99)70199-5 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvisFSgtg%3D%3D 10496715
23. C Greis 2004 Technology overview: SonoVue (Bracco, Milan) Eur Radiol Suppl 14 suppl 8 P11 P15
24. M Brannigan PN Burns SR Wilson 2004 Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US Radiographics 24 4 921 935 10.1148/rg.244035158 15256618
25. MJ Dill-Macky PN Burns K Khalili, et al. 2002 Focal hepatic masses: enhancement patterns with SHU 508A and pulse-inversion US Radiology 222 95 102 10.1148/radiol.2221010092 11756711
26. SR Wilson PN Burns 2001 Liver mass evaluation with ultrasound: the impact of microbubble contrast agents and pulse inversion imaging Semin Liver Dis 21 2 147 159 10.1055/s-2001-15342 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fhs1Ojsw%3D%3D 11436569 (Pubitemid 32552248)
27. R Iezzi R Basilico D Giancristofaro, et al. 2009 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus color duplex ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair J Vasc Surg 49 3 552 560 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.008 19135839
28. MJ Dill-Macky SR Wilson Y Sternbach J Kachura T Lindsay 2007 Detecting endoleaks in aortic endografts using contrast-enhanced sonography AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 3 W262 W268 10.2214/AJR.05.0532 17312033
29. MF Giannoni F Fanelli M Citone, et al. 2007 Contrast ultrasound imaging: the best method to detect type II endoleak during endovascular aneurysm repair follow-up Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6 359 362 10.1510/icvts.2006.137265 17669866 (Pubitemid 46849705)
30. G Carrafiello D Laganà C Recaldini, et al. 2006 Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography in classifying endoleaks after endovascular treatment of abdominal aorta aneurysms: preliminary experience Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29 969 974 10.1007/s00270-005-0267-x 16897267 (Pubitemid 44661942)
31. GH White W Yu J May X Chaufour MS Stephen 1997 Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis, and management J Endovasc Surg 4 152 168 10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0152:EAACOE>2.0.CO;2 1:STN:280: DyaK2szivVCltw%3D%3D 9185003 (Pubitemid 27247069)
32. GH White J May RC Waugh X Chaufour W Yu 1998 Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair J Endovasc Surg 5 305 309 10.1583/1074-6218(1998) 005<0305:TIATIE>2.0.CO;2 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FotlajtQ%3D%3D 9867318
33. GH White J May P Petrasek, et al. 1999 Endotension: an explanation for continued AAA growth after successful endoluminal repair J Endovasc Surg 6 308 315 10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0308:EAEFCA>2.0.CO;2 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3czkvFaiuw%3D%3D 10893130