The neglected power of elite opinion leadership to produce antipathy toward the news media: Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Political Behavior

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 29-50

  Ladd, Jonathan McDonald ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Media bias; News media; Party cues; Public opinion; Survey experiment; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 76649111723     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-009-9097-x     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Achen, C. H. (2002). Toward a new political methodology: Microfoundations and ART. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 423-450.
2. Althaus, S. L., & Kim, Y. M. (2006). Priming effects in complex information environments: Reassessing the impact of news discourse on presidential approval. Journal of Politics, 68(4), 960-976.
3. Anand, B., & Tella, R. D. (2008). Perceived media bias: Some evidence on the impact of prior beliefs and source awareness. Harvard University, Typescript.
4. Arceneaux, K., & Johnson, M. (2007). Channel surfing: Does choice reduce videomalaise? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
5. Barker, D. C., & Knight, K. (2000). Political talk radio and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(2), 149-170.
6. Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 35-50.
7. Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91-109.
8. Baum, M. A. (2003). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Baum, M. A. (2006). The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently. Journal of Politics, 68(4), 946-959.
10. Baum, M. A., & Gussin, P. (2008). In the eye of the beholder: How information shortcuts shape individual perceptions of bias in the media. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3(1), 1-31.
11. Bennett, S. E., Rhine, S. L., & Flickinger, R. S. (2001). Assessing Americans' opinions about the news media's fairness in 1996 and 1998. Political Communication, 18(2), 163-182.
12. Berinsky, A. J. (2009). In time of war: Understanding American public opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analysis. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63-82.
14. Brody, R. A. (1991). Assessing the president: The media, elite opinion, and public support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.
17. Christen, C. T., Kannaovakun, P., & Gunther, A. C. (2002). Hostile media perceptions: Partisan assessments of press and public during the 1997 United Parcel Service strike. Political Communication, 19(4), 423-436.
18. Clinton, J. D. (2006). Representation in Congress: Constituents and roll calls in the 106th House. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 397-409.
19. Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (5), 808-822.
20. Converse, P. E. (1962). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(4), 578-599.
21. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York, NY: Free Press.
22. Cook, T. E. (1998). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Cook, T. E., & Gronke, P. (2001). Dimensions of institutional trust: How distinct is public confidence in the media? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
24. Cook, T. E., Gronke, P., & Rattliff, J. (2000). Disdaining the media: The American public's changing attitudes toward the news. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
25. Crano, W. D., Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345-374.
26. Crawford, C. (2006). Attack the messenger. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
27. Dautrich, K., & Hartley, T. H. (1999). How the news media fail American voters. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
28. Domke, D., Watts, M. D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. P. (1999). The politics of conservative elites and the 'liberal media' argument. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 35-58.
29. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York, NY: Harcourt College Publishers.
30. Emery, M., Emery, E., & Roberts, N. L. (2000). The press and America: An interpretive history of the mass media (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
31. Eveland, W. P., & Shah, D. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24, 101-117.
32. Fallows, J. (1996). Breaking the news: How the media undermine American democracy. New York, NY: Pantheon.
33. Fenno, R. F. (1975). If, as Ralph Nader says, Congress is the 'broken branch,' how come we love our congressmen so much? In N. Ornstein (Ed.), Congress in change: Evolution and reform (pp. 277-287). New York, NY: Praeger.
34. Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
35. Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2007). The logic of the survey experiment reexamined. Political Analysis, 15(1), 1-20.
36. Gilens, M. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(2), 379-396.
37. Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(1), 165-180.
38. Graber, D. A. (1984). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. New York, NY: Longman.
39. Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2002). Reclaiming the experimental tradition in political science. In H. V. Milner & I. Katznelson (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 805-832). New York: W. W. Norton.
40. Green, W. H. (1999). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Gronke, P., & Cook, T. E. (2002). Disdaining the media in the post 9/11 world. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
42. Gronke, P., & Cook, T. E. (2007). Disdaining the media: The American public's changing attitudes toward the news. Political Communication, 24(3), 259-281.
43. Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(2), 147-167.
44. Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 619-631.
45. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American political institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47. Hillygus, D. S., & Jackman, S. (2003). Voter decision making in election 2000. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 583-596.
48. Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945-960.
49. Jacobson, G. C. (2007). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
50. Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51. Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52. Jones, D. A. (2004). Why Americans don't trust the media: A preliminary analysis. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(2), 60-75.
53. Kam, C. D., Franzese, J., & Robert, J. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
54. Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4), 251-271.
55. Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication Research, 34(2), 231-252.
56. Kuklinski, J. H., Cobb, M. D., & Gilens, M. (1997). Racial attitudes and the 'new South'. Journal of Politics, 59(2), 323-349.
57. Ladd, J. (2006a). Attitudes toward the news media and political competition in America. Ph. D. thesis, Princeton University.
58. Ladd, J. M. (2006b). What does trust in the media measure? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
59. Ladd, J. M. (2008). The role of media distrust in partisan voting. Georgetown University, Typescript.
60. Lenz, G. (2009). Learning and opinion change, not priming: Reconsidering the evidence for the priming hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), forthcoming.
61. Lichter, S. R., & Noyes, R. E. (1996). Good intentions make bad news: Why Americans hate campaign journalism (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
62. Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63-76.
63. Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook 27 (pp. 293-335). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 301-315.
66. Miller, W. E. (1999). Temporal order and causal inference. Political Analysis, 8(2), 119-140.
67. Mutz, D. C. (2007). Effects of 'in-your-face' television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 621-635.
68. Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1-15.
69. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231-259.
70. Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. New York, NY: Knopf.
71. Piazza, T., Sniderman, P. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (1989). Analysis of the dynamics of political reasoning. Political Analysis, 1(1), 91-121.
72. Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
73. Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2007). Anna Nicole Smith, anatomy of a feeding frenzy. Project for Excellence in Journalism Special Index Report.
74. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688-701.
75. Sabato, L. J. (1991). Feeding frenzy: How attack journalism has transformed American politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
76. Sabato, L. J. (2000). Feeding frenzy: Attack journalism and American politics. Baltimore, MD: Lanahan Publishers, Inc.
77. Shafer, J. (2007). In defense of the Anna Nicole feeding frenzy: And other pulp journalism run amok. http://www. slate. com/id/216350. Accessed April 6, 2007.
78. Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
79. Sniderman, P. M., & Grob, D. B. (1996). Innovations in experimental design in attitude surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 377-399.
80. Taber, C. S. (2003). Information processing and public opinion. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 433-476). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
81. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.
82. Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249-288). New York: Academic Press.
83. Tourangeau, R. (1987). Attitude measurement: A cognitive perspective. In H.-J. Hippler, N. Schwarz, & S. Sudman (Eds.), Social information processing and survey methodology (pp. 147-162). New York, NY: Springer.
84. Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 299-314.
85. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
86. Tsfati, Y. (2002). The consequences of mistrust in the news media: Media skepticism as a moderator in media effects and as a factor influencing news media exposure. Ph. D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
87. Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504-529.
88. Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2005). Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3), 251-271.
89. Turner, J. (2007). The messenger overwhelming the message: Ideological cues and perceptions of bias in television news. Political Behavior, 29(4), 441-464.
90. Vallone, R. P., Ross, L.,& Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577-585.
91. Watts, M. D., Donke, D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. P. (1999). Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns. Communication Research, 26(2), 144-175.
92. West, D. M. (2001). The rise and fall of the media establishment. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
93. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
94. Zaller, J. R. (1994). Elite leadership of mass opinion: New evidence from the gulf war. In W. L. Bennet & D. L. Paletz (Eds.), Taken by storm: The media, public opinion, and U. S. foreign policy in the Gulf War (pp. 186-209). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
95. Zaller, J. R. (1996). The myth of massive media impact revived. In D. C. Mutz, P. M. Sniderman, & R. A. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 17-78). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
96. Zaller, J. R. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20(1), 109-130.
97. Zaller, J. R., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579-616.