Efficiency and effectiveness of cell phone samples in transportation surveys

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2105, 2009, Pages 44-50

  Sen, Sudeshna ^a   Zmud, Johanna ^a   Arce, Carlos ^a  

^a NuStats   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR TELEPHONES; SURVEYS;

CELL PHONE; COLLECTION EFFORT; CONTACT METHODS; DATA COLLECTION; DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; PHONE NUMBER; RESPONSE RATE; TRANSPORTATION SURVEYS;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 76649105412     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2105-06     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Blumberg, S., and J. Luke. Wireless Substitution: Preliminary Data from the January-June 2006 National Health Interview Survey. www.cdc.gov/ nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/wireless2006/wireless2006.htm.
2. Blumberg, S., and J. Luke. Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates Based on Data from the National Health Interview Survey, July-December 2006. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless 200705.pdf.
3. Blumberg, S., and J. Luke. Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates Based on Data from the National Health Interview Survey, July-December 2007. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless200805. pdf.
4. Link, M. W., M. P. Battaglia, M. R. Frankel, L. Osborn, and A. H. Mokdad. A Comparison of Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Versus Random- Digit Dialing (RDD) For General Population Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol.72, No.1, 2008, pp. 6-27.
5. Kulp, D. W., J. M. Brick, and M. Fahimi. Biases in RDD Sampling: a 21st-Century Digital World Reassessment. Presented at 63rd American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, New Orleans, La., 2008.
6. AAPOR Cell Phone Task Force. Guidelines and Considerations for Survey Researchers When Planning and Conducting RDD and Other Telephone Surveys in the U.S. With Respondents Reached via Cell Phone Numbers. AAPOR, April 2008. www.aapor.org/uploads/Final-AAPOR- Cell-Phone-TF-report-041208.pdf.
7. Steeh, C. A New Era for Telephone Surveys. Presented at Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, Ariz., 2004.
8. Brick, J. M., P. D. Brick, S. Dipko, S. Presser, C. Tucker, and Y. Yuan. Cell Phone Survey Feasibility in the U.S.: Sampling and Calling Cell Numbers Versus Landline Numbers, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol.71, 2007, pp. 23-39.
9. Iannacchione, V. G., J. M. Staab, and D. T. Redden. Evaluating the Use of Residential Mailing Addresses in a Metropolitan Household Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol.76, 2003, pp. 202-210.
10. O'Muircheartaigh, C., S. Eckman, and C. Weiss. Traditional and Enhanced Field Listing for Probability Sampling. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Methodology Section, Vol.25, 2000, pp. 63-67.
11. Staab, J. M., and V. G. Iannacchione. Evaluating the Use of Residential Mailing Addresses in a National Household Survey. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Methodology Section, Vol.40, 2004, pp. 28-33.
12. Link, M. W., M. Battaglia, P. Giambo, M. Frankel, and A. Mokdad. Assessment of Address Frame Replacements for RDD Sampling Frames. Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, Fla., 2005.
13. AAPOR Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 5th ed. AAPOR, Lenexa, Kan., 2008.