Socioeconomic differences in incidence of cervical cancer in Finland by cell type

Acta Oncologica

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 180-184

  Pukkala, Eero ^a,b   Malila, Nea ^a,b   Hakama, Matti ^a,b  

^a FINNISH CANCER REGISTRY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER RISK; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIOECONOMICS; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; WART VIRUS;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGE DISTRIBUTION; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 76649089312     PISSN: 0284186X     EISSN: 1651226X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841860903386390     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. IARC Handbook of cancer prevention. Lyon:IARC Press;2005.
2. Dillner J, Kallings I, Brihmer C, Sikstrom B, Koskela P, Lehtinen M, et al. Seropositivities to human papillomavirus types 16, 18, or 33 capsids and to Chlamydia trachomatis are markers of sexual behavior. J Infect Dis 1996;173:1394-8.
3. Social inequalities and cancer. Lyon:International Agency for Research on Cancer;1997.
4. Clemmesen J. Statistical studies in the aetiology of malignant neoplasms. I. Review and results. Supplement 174. I. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl 1965;174:1-543.
5. Population census 1970:Occupation and social position. Helsinki:Central Statistical Offi ce of Finland;1974.
6. Sauli H. Occupational mortality in 1971-75. Helsinki:Central Statistical Offi ce of Finland;1979.
7. Rauhala U. Social structures of the Finnish society. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health;1966.
8. Pukkala E. Cancer risk by social class and occupation. A survey of 109,000 cancer cases among Finns of working age. Basel:Karger;1995.
9. Pukkala E. Use of record linkage in small-area studies. In:Elliott P, Cuzick J, English D, Stern R, editors. Geographical &environmental epidemiology:Methods for small-area studies. Oxford:Oxford University Press;1992. p 125-31.
10. Pukkala E, Martinsen J, Lynge E, Gunnarsdottir H, Sparen P, Tryggvadottir L, et al. Occupation and cancer -- follow-up of 15 million people in fi ve Nordic countries. Acta Oncol 2009;48:646-790.
11. Parikh S, Brennan P, Boffetta P. Meta-analysis of social inequality and the risk of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 2003;105:687-91.
12. Varghese C. Prevalence and determinants of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection in Kerala, India. Tampere:University of Tampere;2000.
13. Teppo L, Pukkala E, Lehtonen M. Data quality and quality control of a population-based cancer registry. Experience in Finland. Acta Oncol 1994;33:365-9.
14. Anttila A, Pukkala E, Soderman B, Kallio M, Nieminen P, Hakama M. Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963-1995:Recent increase in cervical cancer incidence. Int J Cancer 1999;83:59-65.
15. Kallio M, Kauraniemi T, Nousiainen AR, Hansten S, Rytsola J, Heikkila M, et al. [Participation of women in cervical cancer screening]. Duodecim 1994;110:1061-7.
16. Nieminen P, Kallio M, Hakama M. The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:1017-21.
17. Hakama M, Luostarinen T, Hallmans G, Jellum E, Koskela P, Lehtinen M, et al. Joint effect of HPV16 with Chlamydia trachomatis and smoking on risk of cervical cancer:Antagonism or misclassifi cation (Nordic countries). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:783-90.
18. Koskela P, Anttila T, Bjorge T, Brunsvig A, Dillner J, Hakama M, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection as a risk factor for invasive cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 2000;85:35-9.
19. Kapeu AS, Luostarinen T, Jellum E, Dillner J, Hakama M, Koskela P, et al. Is smoking an independent risk factor for invasive cervical cancer? A nested case-control study within Nordic biobanks. Am J Epidemiol 2009;169:480-8.
20. Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix:Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer 2007;120:885-91.
21. Brinton LA, Tashima KT, Lehman HF, Levine RS, Mallin K, Savitz DA, et al. Epidemiology of cervical cancer by cell type. Cancer Res 1987;47:1706-11.
22. Cervical carcinoma and reproductive factors:Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 16,563 women with cervical carcinoma and 33,542 women without cervical carcinoma from 25 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer 2006;119:1108-24.
23. Horowitz IR, Jacobson LP, Zucker PK, Currie JL, Rosenshein NB. Epidemiology of adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1988;31:25-31.
24. Korhonen MO. Epidemiological differences between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1980;10:312-7.
25. Silcocks PB, Thornton-Jones H, Murphy M. Squamous and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix:A comparison using routine data. Br J Cancer 1987;55:321-5.
26. Peters RK, Chao A, Mack TM, Thomas D, Bernstein L, Henderson BE. Increased frequency of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in young women in Los Angeles County. J Natl Cancer Inst 1986;76:423-8.
27. Hakama M, Hakulinen T, Pukkala E, Saxen E, Teppo L. Risk indicators of breast and cervical cancer on ecologic and individual levels. Am J Epidemiol 1982;116:990-1000.
28. Bray F, Carstensen B, Moller H, Zappa M, Zakelj MP, Lawrence G, et al. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:2191-9.
29. Bray F, Loos AH, McCarron P, Weiderpass E, Arbyn M, Moller H, et al. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries:Changing risk and the effects of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:677-86.