Providing reviews of evidence to COPD patients: Qualitative study of barriers and facilitating factors to patient-mediated practice change

Chronic Respiratory Disease

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 19-28

  Harris, Melanie ^a   Wildgoose, Deborah ^b   Veale, Antony J ^c   Smith, Brian J ^c  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Government of South Australia   (Australia)

^c QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

COPD; Evidence based medicine; Patient participation

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DATA ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REVIEW;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MANUALS AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE;

EID: 76649085217     PISSN: 14799723     EISSN: 14799731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1479972309358634     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G., et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004 ; 8: iii-iv, 1-72.
2. Muhlhauser I., Berger M. Evidence-based patient information in diabetes. Diab Med 2000 ; 17: 823-829.
3. Harris M., Smith B., Veale A. Engaging patients in evidence-based medicine: development of a resource for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Illn 2005 ; 1: 330-336.
4. Harris M., Smith BJ, Veale AJ, Esterman A., Frith PA, Selim P. Providing reviews of evidence to COPD patients: controlled prospective 12-month trial. Chron Resp Dis 2009 ; 6: 165-173.
5. Patton M. Variety in qualitative inquiry. In: Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002, pp. 75-142.
6. Beisecker AE Patient power in doctor-patient communication: what do we know? Health Commun 1990 ; 2: 105-122.
7. NHMRC. How to present the evidence for consumers: preparation of consumer publications. 2000, Canberra: NHMRC.
8. Paul CL, Redman S., Sanson-Fisher RW Print material content and design: is it relevant to effectiveness? Health Educ Res 2003 ; 18: 181-190.
9. Krass I., Svarstad BL, Bultman D. Using alternative methodologies for evaluating patient medication leaflets. Patient Educ Counsel 2002 ; 47: 29-35.
10. Dickinson D., Raynor DK, Duman M. Patient information leaflets for medicines: using consumer testing to determine the most effective design. Patient Educ Couns 2001 ; 43: 147-159.
11. Coulter A., Entwistle V., Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ 1999 ; 318: 318-322.
12. Rice P., Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: a health focus. Oxford: South Melbourne, 1999, pp. 44.
13. Grace C., Begum R., Subhani S., Kopelman P., Greenhalgh T. Prevention of type 2 diabetes in British Bangladeshis: qualitative study of community, religious, and professional perspectives. BMJ 2008 ; 337: a1931.
14. Spalding NJ, Phillips T. Exploring the use of vignettes: from validity to trustworthiness. Qual Health Res 2007 ; 17: 954-962.
15. Young AF, Chesson RA, Wilson AJ People with learning disabilities, carers and care workers awareness of health risks and implications for primary care. Family Prac 2007 ; 24: 576-584.
16. Patton M. Qualitative interviewing. In: Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002, pp. 339-418.
17. Patton M. Qualitative analysis and interpretation. In: Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2002, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002, pp. 431-515.
18. Fishbein M., Triandis HC, Kanfer FH, Becker M., Middlestadt SE, Eichler A. Factors influencing behavior and behavior change. In: Baum A, Revenson TA, Singer JE (eds.) Handbook of health psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001, pp. 3-17.
19. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 2004 ; 31: 143-164.
20. Ritchie J., Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG (eds.) Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 173-194.
21. Crain-Thoreson C., Lippman MZ, McClendon-Magnuson D. Windows on comprehension: reading comprehension processes as revealed by two think-aloud procedures. J Educ Psychol 1997 ; 89: 579-591.
22. Nicolson P., Anderson P. Quality of life, distress and self-esteem: a focus group study of people with chronic bronchitis. Br J Health Psychol 2003 ; 8: 251-270.
23. Hunt LM, Arar NH An analytical framework for contrasting patient and provider views of the process of chronic disease management. Med Anthropol Quart 2001 ; 15: 347-367.
24. Belcher VN, Fried TR, Agostini JV, Tinetti ME Views of older adults on patient participation in medication-related decision making. J Gen Internal Med 2006 ; 21: 298-303.
25. Robinson A., Thomson R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Quality in Health Care 2001 ; 10 Suppl 1: i34 - i38.
26. Oliver SM Living with failing lungs: the doctor-patient relationship. Fam Pract 2001 ; 18: 430-439.
27. Elwyn G. Idealistic, impractical, impossible? Shared decision making in the real world. Br J Gen Prac 2006 ; 56: 403-404.
28. Stapleton H., Kirkham M., Thomas G. Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. BMJ 2002 ; 324: 639.
29. Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. London: MRC, 2008.