Developing effective social work university-community research collaborations

Social Work

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 54-62

  Begun, Audrey L ^a   Berger, Lisa K ^b   Otto Salaj, Laura L ^b   Rose, Susan J ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Applied research; Research collaboration; Research to practice; Technology transfer; University community collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 76649083599     PISSN: 00378046     EISSN: 15456846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sw/55.1.54     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ahmed, S. M., Beck, B., Maurana, C.A., & Newton, G. (2004). Overcoming barriers to effective community-based participatory research in US medical schools. Education for Health, 17(2), 141-151.
2. Austin, S.A., Briar-Lawson, K., King-Ingham.A., Spicer.J., & Davis, D. (2005). Role changes, learning enhancements and professional development through a university-school collaborative. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 8(2/3), 84-97.
3. Backer, T. E. (1995). Assessing and enhancing readiness for change: Implications for technology transfer. In T. E. Backer, S. L. David, & G. Soucy, (Eds.), Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer (pp. 21-41). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
4. Bender,T. (Ed.). (1988). The university and the city: From medieval origins to the present. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
5. Bilsker, D, & Goldner, E. M. (2000).Teaching evidence-based practice in mental health. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 664-669.
6. Bowen, S., & Martens, P.J. (2006). A model for collaborative evaluation of university-community partnerships. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 902-907. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.040881 (Pubitemid 44482812)
7. Coulton, C., & Korbin, J. (2006). Commentary. In L. B. Alexander & P. Solomon, (Eds.), The research process in the human services: Behind the scenes (pp. 408-415). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8. Currie, M., King, G., Rosenbaum, P., Law, M., Kertoy, M., & Specht, J. (2005). A model of impacts of research partnerships in health and social services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 400-412. (Pubitemid 41722596)
9. Delva, J. (2006). Greetings social work colleagues and friends of the profession [Editorial]. Social Work, 51, 5-7.
10. Dluhy, M. J., & Kravitz, S. L. (1990). Building coalitions in the human services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Fielden, S. J., Rusch, M. L., Masinda, M.T., Sands.J., Frankish.J., & Evoy, B. (2007). Key considerations for logic model development in research partnerships: A Canadian case study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(2), 115-124.
12. Fraser, M. W. (2003). Intervention research in social work: A basis for evidence-based practice and practice guidelines. In A. Rosen & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Developing practice guidelines for social work intervention: Issues, methods, and research agenda (pp. 17-35). New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Gass, E. (2005).The path to partnerships: A new model for understanding university-community partnerships. Professional Development:The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 8(2/2), 12-23.
14. Jason, L.A., Pokorny, S. B., Ji, P., & Kunz, C. (2005). Developing community-school-university partnerships to control youth access to tobacco. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16, 201-222. (Pubitemid 44126440)
15. Kanouse, D. E., Kallich, J. D., & Kahan, J. P. (1995). Dissemination of effectiveness and outcomes research. Health Policy, 34(3), 167-192.
16. Kavanagh, K. H. (1995). Collaboration and diversity in technology transfer. In T. E. Backer, S. L. David, & G. Soucy, (Eds.), Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer (pp. 42-64). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
17. Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. (2000). Sixth report. Renewing the covenant: Learning, discovery, and engagement in a new age and different world. Retrieved from http://www.nasulgc.org/ publications/Kellogg/Kellogg2000-covenant.pdf
18. Krieger, J., Allen, C., Cheadle.A., Ciske, S., Schier, J. K., Senturia, K., & Sullivan, M. (2002). Using community-based participatory research to address social determinants of health: Lessons learned from Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities. Health Education & Behavior, 29(3), 361-382.
19. McKay, M. M. (2006). Commentary. In L. B.Alexander & P. Solomon, (Eds.), The research process in the human services: Behind the scenes (pp. 12-19). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20. Mizrahi, T., & Rosenthal, B. B. (1993). Managing dynamic tensions in social change coalitions. In T. Mizrahi & J. D. Morrison (Eds.), Community organization and social administration: Advances, trends, and emerging principles (pp. 11-30). NewYork: Haworth Press.
21. North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA). (2003). Handbook of accreditation (3rd ed.). Chicago: The Higher Learning Commission.
22. O'Fallon, L. R., & Dearry.A. (2002). Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(Suppl.2), 155-159. (Pubitemid 34436378)
23. Pardasani, M. (2005). University-community collaborations: A case study of an effective partnership. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 8(2/3), 64-72.
24. Reid, P.T., & Vianna, E. (2001). Negotiating partnerships in research on poverty with community-based agencies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 337-354.
25. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of drug abuse prevention programs: Spontaneous diffusion, agenda setting, and reinvention. In T. E. Backer, S. L. David, & G. Soucy (Eds.), Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer (pp. 90-105). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
26. Rosen, A., & Proctor, E. K. (2003). Practice guidelines and the challenge of effective practice. In A. Rosen & E. K. Proctor, (Eds.), Developing practice guidelines for social work interventions: Issues, methods, and research agenda (pp. 1-16). NewYork: Columbia University Press.
27. Sobell, L. C. (1996). Bridging the gap between scientists and practitioners:The challenge before us. Behavior Therapy, 27, 297-320.
28. Straub, D. M., Deeds, B. G.,Willard, N., Castor.J., Peralta, L., Francisco,V.T., Ellen, J., & the Adolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Intervention. (2007). Partnership selection and formation: A case study of developing adolescent health community-researcher partnerships in fifteen U.S. communities. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 489-498.
29. Takahashi, L. M., & Smutný, G. (2001). Collaboration among small, community-based organizations: Strategies and challenges in turbulent environments.Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 141-153.
30. Tenkasi,R.V., & Mohrman, S.A. (1995).Technology transfer as collaborative learning. In T. E. Backer, S. L. David, & G. Soucy (Eds.), Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer (pp. 147-168). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
31. Thomas,V. (2002). Conducting research with community agencies: Meeting recruitment and collaboration challenges. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28(1), 9-14.
32. Uehara, E. S., Sohng, S.S.L., Bending, R. L., Seyfried, S., Richey, C.A., Morelli, P., et al. (1996).Toward a values-based approach to multicultural social work research. Social Work, 41, 613-621. (Pubitemid 126421877)
33. Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Gartlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D, et al. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence (Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99 AHR Q Publication 04-E022-2). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.