Developing and implementing an integrated, problem-based engineering technology curriculum in an american technical college system

Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Volumn 25, Issue 5-6, 2001, Pages 425-439

  Craft, Elaine L ^a   Mack, Lynn G ^b  

^a South Carolina State Board for Technical and Comprehensive Education   (United States)

^b Piedmont Technical College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76649083006     PISSN: 10668926     EISSN: 15210413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106689201750192274     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American College Testing (ACT) Institutional Data Files. (1998).
2. American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges Crossroads in Mathematics. (1995). Crossroads in mathematics: Standards for introductory college mathematics before calculus. Memphis, TN: Author.
3. Bottoms, G. & Sharpe, D. (1996). Teaching for understanding through integration of academic and technical education. (96V11). Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
4. Bucci, P., Evans, W., & Choi, W. (1999, May) The South Carolina Advanced Technological Education fall semester 1998 curriculum pilot project: evaluation report. The Academy for Educational Development.
5. Bucci, P. T., Evans, W. D., Kung, S. (1999, May). The South Carolina Advanced Technological Education Exemplary Faculty Project: Year Three Evaluation Report, The Academy for Educational Development.
6. Collins, T., Gentry, D., & Crawley, V. (1993). Gaining the competitive edge: Critical issues in science and engineering technician education. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation
7. Evans, W. D. (1998, June). Determinants of Enrollment and Retention in South Carolina Engineering Technology Programs, South Carolina Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence.
8. Felder, R.M. (1993, March/April). Reaching the second tier—learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5).
9. Gardner, A. L., Mason, C. L., & Lakes, M. M. (1989, February). Equity, Excellence, & Just Plain Good Teaching, American Biology Teacher, 51.
10. Humphreys, A., Post, T., & Ellis, A. (1981). Interdisciplinary Methiods: A Thematic Approach, Goodyear Publishing Co., Santa Monica, CA
11. Jessup, G. as quoted by W. Forrest in “Promising prospects: An inner London approach to 21st century skills". (1999, November). Learning Abstracts, League of Innovation in the Community College, (2), 7.
12. Judy, R. W. (1998). American Association of Community Colleges/National Science Foundation Principal Investigators Conference.
13. Mack, L. G., Mecca, T. V., Cushing, S. (1998). Shaping a Curriculum from Workplace Research, Piedmont Technical College.
14. O’Banion, T. (1997). A learning college for the twenty-first century. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
15. Panitz, B. (1997, September). The integrated curriculum. ASEE PRISM, p. 25
16. Persons, T. (1999). The tera-byte, South Carolina Technology Alliance, (1), 1.
17. Rosser, S. V., & Kelly, B. (1994). Educating Women for Success in Science and Mathematics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina.
18. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency Publishing Group, Inc.
19. Senge, P. M. Voices of Excellence: Lesson Plans for Our Best Math and Science Teachers, The Southern Technology Council, 1993.
20. Wood, J. C. (1997, September). Engineering technology curriculum integration in an associate degree program, Paper presented at the ASEE Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
21. Yager, R. E., & Lutz, M. V. (1994, November). Integrated science: the importance of “how” versus “what.” School science and mathematics, (94), 7.