Risk factors for sanitary condemnation in broiler chickens and their relative impact: Application of an original multiblock approach

Epidemiology and Infection

Volumn 138, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 364-375

  Lupo, C ^a   Bougeard, S ^a   Balaine, L ^a   Michel, V ^a   Petetin, I ^a   Colin, P ^b   Lebouquin, S ^a   Chauvin, C ^a  

^a Healthy Pigs Production and Experimentation Section   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE OCCIDENTALE   (France)

Author keywords

Complex modelling; Condemnation; Food safety; Multiblock redundancy analysis; Poultry

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPLANATORY VARIABLE; FOOD SAFETY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTIBLOCK REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME VARIABLE; RISK FACTOR; SANITATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; BIRD DISEASE; FOOD CONTROL; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; SLAUGHTERHOUSE; STANDARD;

ABATTOIRS; AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; FOOD INSPECTION; POULTRY DISEASES; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 76549134807     PISSN: 09502688     EISSN: 14694409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268809990549     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anon. Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Union 2004; L139: 206-320.
2. Stark KD. Food safety achieved through herd management [in German]. Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde 2000; 142: 673-678.
3. Lupo C, et al. Feasibility of screening broiler chicken flocks for risk markers as an aid for meat inspection. Epidemiology and Infection 2009; 137: 1086-1098.
4. Lupo C, et al. Post mortem condemnation of processed broiler chickens in Western France. Veterinary Record 2008; 162: 709-713.
5. Bremner AS. Post mortem condemnation returns from poultry slaughterhouses in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 1994; 135: 622-623.
6. Schrader JS, Singer RS, Atwill ER. A prospective study of management and litter variables associated with cellulitis in California broiler flocks. Avian Diseases 2004; 48: 522-530.
7. Elfadil AA, Vaillancourt JP, Meek AH. Farm management risk factors associated with cellulitis in broiler chickens in southern Ontario. Avian Diseases 1996; 40: 699-706.
8. Elfadil AA, et al. A prospective study of cellulitis in broiler chickens in southern Ontario. Avian Diseases 1996; 40: 677-689.
9. Saint-Hilaire S, Sears W. Trends in cellulitis condemnations in the Ontario chicken industry between April 1998 and April 2001. Avian Diseases 2003; 47: 537-548.
10. Mallia JG, et al. Risk factors for abattoir condemnation of turkey carcasses due to cyanosis in southern Ontario. Poultry Science 2000; 79: 831-837.
11. Roush WB, et al. Artificial neural network prediction of ascites in broilers. Poultry Science 1996; 75: 1479-1487.
12. Habtemariam T, Cho Y. A computer based decisionmaking model for poultry inspection. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1983; 183: 1440-1446.
13. Farver TB, et al. The relationship between various production factors, condemnation, and downgrading in turkeys: factor analysis as a method of variable reduction. Avian Diseases 1981; 25: 463-478.
14. Bougeard S, et al. From multiblock Partial Least Squares to multiblock redundancy analysis. A continuum approach. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Statistics. Porto, Portugal, 2008, pp. 607-616.
15. Bougeard S, Hanafi M, Qannari EM. ACPVI Multibloc. Application à des données d'épidémiologie animale. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique 2007; 148: 77-94.
16. Agreste. Poultry census 2004-2005 (http://agreste. agriculture.gouv.fr/ IMG/pdf/R5306A02.pdf). Accessed 28 November 2008.
17. Anon. Arreté du 8 juin 1996 déterminant les conditions de l'inspection sanitaire post mortem des volailles. Journal Officiel de la République Française 1996; 161: 10505.
18. Escofier B, Pagès J. Méthode pour l'analyse de plusieurs groupes de variables. Revue de Statistique Applique ́e 1983; 31: 43-59.
19. Rao CR. The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhya - The Indian Journal of Statistics Series A 1964; 26: 329-358.
20. Massy WF. Principal components regression in exploratory statistical research. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1965; 60: 234-256.
21. Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1974; 36: 111-147.
22. Dohoo I, Martin W, Stryhn H. Modelling count and rate data. In: Veterinary Epidemiological Research. Charlottetown, Canada: AVC Inc., 2003, pp. 391-406.
23. SAS. SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc., 2007.
24. Matlab Version 7. Natick, MA, USA: The MathWorks Inc., 2004.
25. Lupo C, et al. Condemnation prevalence and determination of risk indicators in male turkey broiler flocks in Western France. Preventive Veterinary Medicine (in press). 374 C. Lupo and others
26. Dohoo I, et al. An overview of techniques for dealing with large numbers of independent variables in epidemiologic studies. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 1996; 29: 221-239.
27. Weissfeld LA, Sereika SM. A multicollinearity diagnostic for generalized linear models. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 1991; 20: 1183-1198.
28. Lafi SQ, Kaneene JB. An explanation of the use of principal-components analysis to detect and correct for multicollinearity. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 1992; 13: 261-275.
29. Bougeard S, et al. Proposal of a multiblock factorial analysis for data traiting in animal epidemiology. Epidémiologie et Santé Animale 2008; 53: 1-10.
30. Martin SW, Meek AH, Willeberg P. Veterinary Epidemiology, Principles and Methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1987, pp. 343.
31. Blaha T, et al. Proposals for designing the food chain information for the implementation of the risk-oriented ante- and post-mortem meat inspection [in German]. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 2007; 114: 309-316.
32. Hugues BO, Duncan IJ. Influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowls. British Poultry Science 1972; 13: 525-547.
33. Bouvarel I, et al. Nature et importance des défauts d'aspects des carcasses de dindes - Conditions d'élevage susceptibles d'intervenir sur les lésions de picage et de griffage. Sciences et Techniques Avicoles 1996; 16: 36-45.
34. Lahaye M, et al. Analysis of sanitary data with fuzzy regression tree. Epidémiologie et Santé Animale 2005; 48: 21-26.
35. Herenda D, Jakel O. Poultry abattoir survey of carcass condemnation for standard, vegetarian, and free range chickens. Canadian Veterinary Journal 1994; 35: 293-296.
36. Mayes FJ. The incidence of bruising in broiler flocks. British Poultry Science 1980; 21: 505-509.
37. Anon. Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union 2004; L139: 55-205.