Visual reaction time and size constancy

Perception

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1601-1609

  Sperandio, Irene ^a   Savazzi, Silvia ^a   Gregory, Richard L ^b   Marzi, Carlo A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76549132147     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p6421     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andrews D P, 1964 ''Error-correcting perceptual mechanisms'' Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 105-115
2. Arnold D H, Birt A, Wallis S A, 2008 ''Perceived size and spatial coding'' Journal of Neuroscience 285954-285958
3. Bolles R C, Bailey D N, 1956 ''Importance of object recognition in size constancy'' Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 222-225
4. Cattell J M, 1886 ''The influence of the intensity of the stimulus on the length of the reaction time'' Brain 8 512-515
5. Cheng C Y, Yen M Y, Lin H Y, Hsia W W, Hsu W M, 2004 ''Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia'' Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 45 2856-2860
6. Epstein W, Park J, Casey A, 1961 ''The current status of the size-distance hypothesis'' Psychological Bulletin 8 491-514
7. Exner S, 1868 ''Uber die zu einer Gesichtswahrnehmung notige Zeit'' Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 57 601-632
8. Gilinsky A S, 1955 ''The effect of attitude upon the perception of size'' American Journal of Psychology 68 173-192
9. Gregory R L, 1997 Eye and Brain 5th edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
10. Gregory R L, 1998 The Oxford Companion to the Mind 2nd edition (New York: Oxford University Press)
11. Harvey L D, Leibowitz H W, 1967 ''Effects of exposure duration, cue reduction, and temporary monocularity on size matching at short distances'' Journal of the Optical Society of America 57249-57253
12. Holaday B E, 1933 ''Die Grossenkonstanz der Sehdinge bei Variation der inneren und ausseren Wahrnehmungsbedingungen'' Archiv fur die Gesamte Psychologie 88 419-486
13. Holway A H, Boring E G, 1941 ''Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant'' American Journal of Psychology 54 21-37
14. Howard I P, Rogers B J, 2002 Seeing in Depth volume II: Depth Perception (Toronto: Porteous)
15. Imamura M, Nakamizo S, 2006 ''An empirical test of formal equivalence between Emmert's law and the size-constancy invariance hypothesis'' Spanish Journal of Psychology 9 295-299
16. Kilpatrick F P, Ittelson W M, 1953 ''The size-distance invariance hypothesis'' Psychological Review 60223-60231
17. Leibowitz H W, Moore D, 1966 ''Role of changes in accommodation and convergence in the perception of size'' Journal of the Optical Society of America 56 1120-1123
18. McKee S P, Welch L, 1992 ''The precision of size constancy'' Vision Research 32 1447-1460
19. Marzi C A, Mancini F, Metitieri T, Savazzi S, 2006 ''Retinal eccentricity effects on reaction time to imagined stimuli'' Neuropsychologia 44 1489-1495
20. Milner A D, Goodale M A, 2008 ''Two visual systems re-viewed'' Neuropsychologia 46 774-785
21. Morgan M J, 1992 ''On the scaling of size judgments orientational cues'' Vision Research 32 1433-1445
22. Murray S O, Boyaci H, Kersten D, 2006 ''The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex'' Nature Neuroscience 9 429-434
23. Nakamizo S, Imamura M, 2004 ''Verification of Emmert's law in actual and virtual environments'' Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science 23 325-329
24. Ono H, 1966 ''Distal and proximal size under reduced and non-reduced viewing conditions'' American Journal of Psychology 79 234-241
25. Osaka N, 1976 ''Reaction time as a function of peripheral retinal locus around fovea: effect of stimulus size'' Perceptual and Motor Skills 42 603-606
26. Pieron H, 1914 ''Recherches sur les lois de variation des temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensites excitatrices'' L'Annee Psychologique 20 17-96
27. Pins D, Bonnet C, 1996 ''On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Pieron's law and choice reaction time'' Perception & Psychophysics 58 390-400
28. Pins D, Bonnet C, 2000 ''The Pieron function in the threshold region'' Perception & Psychophysics 62127-62136
29. Ross J, Jenkins B, Johnstone J R, 1980 ''Size constancy fails below half a degree'' Nature 283 473-474
30. Schiffman R, 1967 ''Size-estimation of familiar objects under informative and reduced conditions of viewing'' American Journal of Psychology 80 229-235
31. Sedgwick H A, 1986 ''Space perception'', in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance Eds K R Boff, L Kaufman, J P Thomas (New York: John Wiley) pp 21.1-21.57
32. Slack C W, 1956 ''Familiar size as a cue to size in the presence of conflicting cues'' Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 194-198
33. Wundt W, 1874 Grundzuge der Physiologischen Psychologie (Leipzig: Engelmann)