R&D portfolio and market structure

Economic Journal

Volumn 120, Issue 543, 2010, Pages 313-323

  Kwon, Illoong ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EXPENDITURE; FIRM SIZE; INNOVATION; MARKET SYSTEM; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 76549119365     PISSN: 00130133     EISSN: 14680297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02294.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bessen J, Maskin E. Sequential innovations, patent and imitation. 2006, ', Economics Working Papers No. 0025, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science
2. Bhattacharya S, Mookherjee D. 'Portfolio choice in research and development'. Rand Journal of Economics 1986, 17(4):594-605. vol, pp
3. Cabral L. 'Bias in market R&D portfolios'. International Journal of Industrial Organization 1994, 12(4):533-47. vol, pp
4. Cohen WM, Levin RC. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Handbook of Industrial Organization 1986, 2:1059-107. Schmalensee R, Willig R. in, eds, vol, pp, Amsterdam, Elsevier
5. Cohen WM, Klepper S. 'Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D'. Review of Economics and Statistics 1996, 78(2):232-43. vol, pp
6. Cohen WM, Levin RC, Mowery DC. 'Firm size and R&D intensity: a re-examination'. Journal of Industrial Economics 1987, 35(4):543-65. vol, pp
7. Dasgupta P, Maskin E. 'The simple economics of research portfolios'. Economic Journal 1987, 97(387):581-95. vol, pp
8. Kato A. 'Market structure and the allocation of R&D expenditures'. Economics Letters 2005, 87:55-9. vol, pp
9. Klette T, de Meza D. 'Is the market biased against risky R&D?'. Rand Journal of Economics 1986, 17(1):133-9. vol, pp
10. Kwon I. Patent portfolio race and secrecy. 2008, ', mimeo, SUNY-Albany
11. Levin RC, Cohen W, Mowery DC. 'R&D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: new evidence on the Schumpeterian hypothesis'. American Economic Review 1985, 75(2):20-4. vol, pp
12. Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG. 'Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development'. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987, 3:783-820. vol, pp
13. Link AN. 'An analysis of the composition of R&D spending'. Southern Economic Journal 1982, 49(2):342-9. vol, pp
14. Mansfield E. 'Composition of R and D expenditure: relationship to size of firm, concentration, and innovative output'. Review of Economics and Statistics 1981, 63(4):610-5. vol, pp
15. O'Donoghue T, Scotchmer S, Thisse J. 'Patent breadth, patent life and the pace of technological progress'. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 1998, 7:1-32. vol, pp
16. Reinganum JF. 'Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly'. American Economic Review 1983, 73(4):741-8. vol, pp
17. Scotchmer S. 'Standing on the shoulders of giants: cumulative research and the patent law'. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1991, 5(1):29-41. vol, pp
18. Shapiro C. Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard-setting. Innovation Policy and the Economy 2001, 1:119-50. Jaffe ALerner JStern S. in, eds, vol, pp, Cambridge MA, MIT Press