Comparison of two learning algorithms in modelling the generator's learning abilities

2009 15th International Conference on Intelligent System Applications to Power Systems, ISAP '09

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Qiu, Zhifeng ^a   Peeters, Eefje ^b   Deconinck, Geert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b FLEMISH INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH VITO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Game theory; Optimal bidding; Power market; Reinforcement learning

Indexed keywords

LEARNING ABILITIES; LONG TERM; MARKET POWER; OPTIMAL ACTIONS; OPTIMAL BIDDING; POWER MARKET; POWER MARKETS; SIMULATION RESULT; STOCHASTIC CHARACTERISTIC;

COMMERCE; GAME THEORY; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; PROFITABILITY; REINFORCEMENT; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 76549101487     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISAP.2009.5352877     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. A.K.David, Fushuan Wen, "Strategic Bidding in Competitive Electricity Markets: a Literature Survey," Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2000. IEEE, Vol. 4, pp. 2168-2173, July, 2000, Seattle, WA, USA.
2. R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions. Mineola, NY: Dover, 1989.
3. D. Ray, F. Alvarado. Use of an engineering model for economic analysis in the electricity utility industry. presented at the Advanced Workshop on Regulation and Public Utility Economics, May 25-27, 1988.
4. R. D. Zimmerman and Carlos E. Murillo-Sánchez, D. Gan, "MATPOWER: A MATLAB Power System Simulation Package (Version 3.2)," Cornell University, New York 2007. available on http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/.
5. Vasileios P. Gountis, Anastasios G. Bakirtzis, Bidding Strategies for Electricity Producers in a Competitive Electricity Marketplace, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 19, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2004.
6. Dutta, Prajit K. (1999), Strategies and games: theory and practice, MIT Press, ISBN 978-0-262-04169-0.
7. Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L. Littman, Andrew W. Moore, Reinforcement Learning: A Survey, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4(1996), 237-285.
8. M. Guo, Y. Liu, and J. Malec, "A new Q-learning algorithm based on the metropolis criterion," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B: Cybern., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 2140-2143, Oct. 2004.
9. Roth, - Alvin- E., - and- Erev, - Ido.- Learning- in- extensive- form- games:- Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term, Games and Econ. Behavior 8, 164-212. 1995.
10. J. Nie and S. Haykin, "A dynamic channel assignment policy through Q-learning," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1443-1455, Nov. 1999.
11. Junjie Sun, Leigh Tesfatsion, Dynamic Testing of Wholesale Power Market Designs: An Open-Source Agent-Based Framework, Working Paper No. 06025, available on http://www.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/DynTestAMES.JSLT.pdf.