Corrigendum to “Plant architecture, prey distribution and predator release strategy interact to affect foraging efficiency of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on cucumber” [Biol. Control 53 (2010) 136–141](S1049964409002977)(10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.11.007);Plant architecture, prey distribution and predator release strategy interact to affect foraging efficiency of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on cucumber

Biological Control

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 136-141

  Gontijo, Lessando M ^a   Margolies, David C ^a   Nechols, James R ^a   Cloyd, Raymond A ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmentative biological control; Cucumis sativus; Phytosiulus persimilis; Predator consumption rate; Predator oviposition rate; Prey finding; Tetranychus urticae

Indexed keywords

ACARI; ARANEAE; CUCUMIS SATIVUS; PHYTOSEIIDAE; PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS; TETRANYCHIDAE; TETRANYCHUS URTICAE;

EID: 76549090090     PISSN: 10499644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104183     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Andow D.A., and Prokrym D.R. Plant structural complexity and host-finding by a parasitoid. Oecologia 82 (1990) 162-165
2. Barbosa P., and Letourneau D.K. Novel Aspects of Insect-Plant Interactions (1988), Wiley, New York
3. Barron J.A., and Margolies D.C. Within-plant dispersal of Banks grass mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on corn. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 64 (1991) 209-215
4. Burbutis P.P., and Koepke C.H. European corn borer control in peppers by Trichogramma nubilale. Journal of Economic Entomology 74 (1981) 246-247
5. Clark T.L., and Messina F.J. Foraging behavior of lacewing larvae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on plants with divergent architectures. Journal of Insect Behavior 11 (1998) 303-317
6. Cloyd R.A., and Sadof C.S. Effects of plant architecture on the attack rate of Leptomastix dactylopii (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of the citrus mealybug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Environmental Entomology 29 (2000) 535-541
7. Coll M., and Bottrell D.G. Effects of nonhost plants on an insect herbivore in diverse habitats. Ecology 75 (1994) 723-731
8. Dicke M., and Sabelis M.W. Does it pay plants to advertise for bodyguards? Towards a cost-benefit analysis of induced synomone production. In: Lambers H., Cambridge M.L., Connings H., and Pons T.L. (Eds). Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of Higher Plants (1989), SPB Acad, The Hague 341-358
9. Freese G. Structural refuges in two stem boring weevils on Rumex crispus. Ecological Entomology 20 (1995) 351-358
10. Gontijo, L.M., 2008. Effects of plant architecture and prey distribution on the foraging efficiency and behavior of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). M.S. Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, p. 98.
11. Grevstad F., and Klepetka B.W. The influence of plant architecture on the foraging efficiencies of a suite of ladybird beetles feeding on aphids. Oecologia 92 (1992) 399-404
12. Jackson G.J., and Ford J.B. The feeding behaviour of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), particularly as affected by certain pesticides. Annals of Applied Biology 75 (1973) 165-171
13. Kanour W.W., and Burbutis P.P. Trichogramma nubilale (Hym. Trichogrammatidae) field releases in corn and a hypothetical model for control of European corn borer (Lep.: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 77 (1984) 103-107
14. Kareiva P., and Sahakian R. Tritrophic effects of a simple architectural mutation in pea plants. Nature 345 (1990) 433-434
15. Lawton J.H. Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 28 (1983) 23-39
16. Legrand A., and Barbosa P. Plant morphological complexity impacts foraging efficiency of adult Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environmental Entomology 32 (2003) 1219-1226
17. Lukianchuk J.L., and Smith S.M. Influence of plant structural complexity on the foraging success of Trichogramma minutum: a comparison of search on artificial and foliage models. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 84 (1997) 221-228
18. Maini, S., Burgio, G., 1990. Biological control of the European corn borer in protected pepper by Trichogramma maidis Pint. and Voeg. and Bacillus thuringiensis Berl. In: Wajnberg, E., Vinson, S.B. (Eds.), Trichogramma and Other Egg Parasitoids. Proceedings, 3rd International Symposium, Sept. 23-27, 1990, San Antonio, TX. Les Colloques, No 56. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Paris, France, pp. 213-216.
19. Obrycki J.J., and Tauber M.J. Natural enemy activity on glandular pubescent potato plants in the greenhouse: An unreliable predictor of effects in the field. Environmental Entomology 13 (1984) 679-683
20. Opit G.P., Nechols J.R., Margolies D.C., and Williams K.A. Survival rate and horizontal distribution pattern of predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) released using mechanical blowers. Biological Control 33 (2005) 344-351
21. Peitsch D., Fietz A., Hertel H., de Souza J., Ventura D.F., and Menzel R. The spectral input systems of hymenopteran insects and their receptor-based colour vision. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 170 (1992) 23-40
22. Razdoburdin V.A. Influence of the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina, Tetranychidae) population density on its dynamics on different cucumber cultivars. Entomological Review 86 (2006) 398-408
23. Romero G.Q., and Vasconcellos-Neto J. The effects of plant structure on the spatial and microspatial distribution of a bromeliad-living jumping spider (Salticidae). Journal of Animal Ecology 74 (2005) 12-21
24. Ryoo M.I. Influence of the spatial distribution pattern of prey among patches and spatial coincidence on the functional and numerical response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina, Phytoseiidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 120 (1996) 187-192
25. Sabelis, M.W., 1981. Biological control of two-spotted spider mite using phytoseiid predators. Part I: Modelling the predator-prey interaction at the individual level. Agricultural Research Reports 910, Pudoc, Wageningen, Netherlands, p. 242.
26. Sabelis M.W., and Dicke M. Long-range dispersal and searching behaviour. In: Helle W., and Sabelis M.W. (Eds). Spider Mites, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control vol. 1B (1985), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 141-160
27. Institute S.A.S. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 8.2 (2002), SAS Institute, Cary NC
28. Sites R.W., and Cone W.W. Vertical dispersion of twospotted spider mites on hops throughout the growing season. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 82 (1985) 22-25
29. Skirvin D., and Fenlon J.S. Of mites and movement: the effects of plant connectedness and temperature on movement of Phytoseiulus persimilis. Biological Control 27 (2003) 242-250
30. Stamp N.E., and Browers M.D. Presence of predatory wasps and stinkbugs alters foraging behavior of cryptic and non-cryptic on plantain (Plantago lanceolata). Oecologia 95 (1993) 376-384
31. Stavrinides M.C., and Skirvin D.J. The effect of chrysanthemum leaf trichome density and prey spatial distribution on predation of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) by Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 93 (2003) 343-350
32. Strong W.B., and Croft B.A. Inoculative release of phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) into the rapidly expanding canopy of hops for the control of Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Environmental Entomology 24 (1995) 446-453
33. Thorpe K.W. Effects of height and habitat type on egg parasitism by Trichogramma minutum and T. pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Agriculture, Ecosystem and the Environment 12 (1985) 117-126
34. Wilson L.T., Gonzalez D., Leigh T.F., Maggi V., Foristiere C., and Goodell P. Within-plant distribution of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) on cotton: a developing implementable monitoring program. Environmental Entomology 12 (1983) 128-134
35. Yasuda H., and Ishikawa H. Effects of prey density and spatial distribution on prey consumption of the adult predatory ladybird beetle. Journal of Applied Entomology 123 (1999) 474-478