Erratum to Mission: Impossible? On empirical-normative collaboration in ethical reasoning (Ethic Theory Moral Prac, 10.1007/s10677-009-9170-x);Mission: Impossible? On empirical-normative collaboration in ethical reasoning

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 59-71

  Schleidgen, Sebastian ^a   Jungert, Michael C ^a   Bauer, Robert H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Empirical social sciences; Empirical normative collaboration; Humes law; Naturalistic fallacy; Normative theory development; Ought implies Can

Indexed keywords

EID: 76549088248     PISSN: 13862820     EISSN: 15728447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-009-9179-1     Document Type: Erratum

References (29)

1. Albert H (1972) Konstruktion und Kritik. Aufsätze zur Philosophie des kritischen Rationalismus. Hoffmann und Campe, Hamburg.
2. Bailey AM (2006) Why 'ought' still implies 'can'. www. andrewmbailey. com/OughtImpliesCan. pdf. Accessed 31 March 2008.
3. Birnbacher D (1988) Verantwortung für zukünftige Generationen. Philip Reclam jun, Stuttgart.
4. Birnbacher D (1999) Ethics and social science: which kind of co-operation? Ethical Theory Moral Pract 2: 319-336. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1009903815157.
5. Birnbacher D (2003) Analytische Einführung in die Ethik. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, NY.
6. Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K (2005) The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. Bioethics 19: 49-71. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8519. 2005. 00424. x.
7. Collingridge DG (1977) 'Ought-implies-Can' and Hume's rule. Philosophy 52: 348-351. doi: 10. 1017/S0031819100027194.
8. Engels E-M (2008) Was und wo ist ein "naturalistischer Fehlschluss"? Zur Definition und Identifikation eines Schreckgespenstes der Ethik. In: Brand C, Engels E-M, Ferrari A, Kovács L (eds) Wie funktioniert Bioethik?. Mentis, Paderborn, pp 125-141.
9. Foot P (1974) Moralische Argumentationen. In: Grewendorf G, Meggle G (eds) Seminar: Sprache und Ethik. Zur Entwicklung der Metaethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. Main, pp 244-259.
10. Fox RC, Swazey JP (1984) Medical morality is not bioethics. Perspect Biol Med 27: 337-360.
11. Gewirth A (1978) Reason and morality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Hare RM (1967) The promising game. In: Foot P (ed) Theories of ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 83-100.
13. Hume D (1992) A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. MacIntyre AC (1981) After virtue: a study in moral theory. Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame.
15. Molewijk B (2004) Integrated empirical ethics: in search for clarifying identities. Med Health Care Philos 7: 85-87. doi: 10. 1023/B: MHEP. 0000021851. 43585. 26.
16. Molewijk B, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit J (2004) Empirical data and moral theory. A Plea for integrated empirical ethics. Med Health Care Philos 7: 55-69. doi: 10. 1023/B: MHEP. 0000021848. 75590. b0.
17. Moore GE (1993) Principia ethica. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Musschenga AW (2005) Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism. J Med Philos 30: 467-490. doi: 10. 1080/03605310500253030.
19. Nelson JL (2000) Moral teachings from unexpected quarters. Lessons from the social sciences and managed care. Hastings Cent Rep 30: 12-17. doi: 10. 2307/3527989.
20. Pidgen CR (1990) Ought-implies-can: Erasmus, Luther, and R. M. Hare. Sophia 29: 2-30.
21. Ruß HG (2002) Empirisches Wissen und Moralkonstruktion. Eine Untersuchung zur Möglichkeit und Reichweite von Brückenprinzipien in der Natur- und Bioethik. Hänsel-Hohenhausen, Frankfurt a. M., München, New York.
22. Saka P (2000) Ought does not imply Can. Am Philos Q 37: 93-105.
23. Schurz G (1997) The Is-Ought problem. Kluwer Academic, An Investigation in Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht.
24. Searle JR (1964) How to derive 'ought' from 'is'. Philos Rev 73: 43-58. doi: 10. 2307/2183201.
25. Solomon MZ (2005) Realizing bioethics' goals in practice: ten ways "is" can help "ought". Hastings Cent Rep 35: 40-47.
26. Stern R (2004) Does 'Ought' imply 'Can'? And did Kant think it does? Utilitas 16: 42-61. doi: 10. 1017/S0953820803001055.
27. Streumer B (2003) Does 'Ought' conversationally implicate 'Can'? Eur J Philos 11: 219-228. doi: 10. 1111/1468-0378. 00184.
28. van der Scheer L, Widdershoven G (2004) Integrated empirical ethics: loss of normativity? Med Health Care Philos 7: 71-79. doi: 10. 1023/B: MHEP. 0000021849. 57115. eb.
29. Weaver GR, Trevino LK (1994) Normative and empirical business ethics: separation, marriage of convenience, or marriage of necessity? Bus Ethics Q 4: 129-143. doi: 10. 2307/3857485.