Development of a participatory process to address fragmented application of outcome measurement for rehabilitation in community settings

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 511-520

  Hillier, Susan ^a   Comans, Tracy ^b,c   Sutton, Mathew ^a   Amsters, Delena ^b   Kendall, Melissa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND HEALTH   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community based rehabilitation; Outcome measures; Participation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COMMUNITY CARE; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REHABILITATION;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUEENSLAND; REHABILITATION;

EID: 76449105109     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638280903171519     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Futurehealth. Managed care glossary, 2nd ed. [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: University of California, San Francisco. Last accessed 20 Mar 2009; available from www.futurehealth.ucsf. edu/cnetwork/resources/glossary/gloNO.html
2. Galea M. Introducing clinimetrics. Aust J Physiother 2005; 51:139-140.
3. Asplund J. Clinimetrics in stroke research. Stroke 1987; 8:528-530.
4. Hatfield D, Ogles B. Why some clinicians use outcome measures and others do not. Admin Policy Mental Health 2007;34:283-291.
5. Skeat J, Perry A. Exploring the implementation and use of outcome measurement in practice: a qualitative study. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008;43:110-125.
6. Epstein R, Alper B, Quill T. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. J Am Med Assoc 2004;291: 2359-2366.
7. World Health Organisation. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2002, Last accessed 20 Mar 2009; available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/ icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
8. Chen F. What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in crosscultural research. J Personal Soc Psychol 2008;95:1005-1018.
9. McHorney C, Fleishman J. Assessing and understanding measurement equivalence in health outcome measures: issues for further quantitative and qualitative inquiry. Med Care 2006;44:205-210.
10. The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998;28:551-558.
11. Holbrook M, Skilbeck C. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983;12:166-170.
12. Keysor J, Jette A, Haley S. Development of the home and community environment (HACE) instrument. J Rehabil Med 2005;37: 37-44.
13. van Balen H, Westzaan P, Mulder T. Stratified norms for the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1996;6:203-217.
14. Katzman R, Brown T, Fuld P, Peck A, Schechter R, Schimmel H. Validation of a short Orientation-Memory- Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry 1983;140;734-739.
15. Burke W, Roccaforte W, Wengel S, Conley D, Potter J. The reliability and validity of the geriatric depression rating scale administered by telephone. J Am Geriatrics Soc 1995; 43:674-679.
16. Mulroy S, Lassen K, Chambers S, Perry J. The ability of male and female clinicians to effectively test knee extension strength using manual muscle testing. J Orthopaedic Sports Phys Ther 1997;26:192-199.
17. Haugh A, Pandyan A, Johnson G. A systematic review of the Tardieu Scale for the measurement of spasticity. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:899-907.
18. Wolf S, Catlin P, Ellis M, Archer A, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:1635-1639.
19. Bohannon RW. Measurement of hand grip strength: manual muscle testing versus dynamometry. Physiother Can 1999; 51:268-272.
20. Hill K, Bernhardt J, McGann A, Maltese D, Berkovits D. A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly. Physiother Can 1996;48:257-262.
21. Powell L, Myers A. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol Med Sci 1995;50a:28-34.
22. Benaim C, Perennou D, Villy J, Rousseaux M, Pelissier J. Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients: the Postural Assessment Scale for stroke patients (PASS). Stroke 1999;30:1862-1868.
23. Podsiadlo D, Richardson R. The timed "up and go": a test of basic mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Gerontol Soc 1991;39:142-148.
24. Carr J, Shepherd R, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke. Phys Ther 1985; 65:175-180.
25. Harada N. Mobility-related function in older adults: assessment with a 6-minute walk test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80:837.
26. Barreca S, Gowland C, Stratford P, Torresin W, Huijbregts M, Van Hullenaar S, Miller P, Griffiths J, Dunkley M, Marmer D. Development of the Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: item selection. Physiother Can 1999;29:209-211.
27. Williams P, Basso M, Case-Smith J, Nichols-Larsen D. Development of the hand active sensation test: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1471-1477.
28. Wade D. Measuring arm impairment and disability after stroke. Int Disabil Stud 1989;11:89-92.
29. Enderby P. Frenchay dysarthria assessment manual. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press; 1983.
30. Kertesz A. Western aphasia battery. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1982.
31. Jacobson BH. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 1997;6:66-70.
32. Ward E, Controy A. Validity, reliability and responsitivity of the Royal Brisbane Hospital outcome measure for swallowing. Asia Pacific J Speech Lang Hear 1999;4:109-129.
33. Amirkhan J. A factor analytically derived measure of coping: the coping strategy indicator. J Personal Soc Psychol 1990; 59:1066-1074.
34. Nelson L, Satz P, Mitrushina M, Van Gorp W, Cicchetti D, Lewis R, Van Lancker D. Development and validation of the neuropsychology behaviour and affect profile. Psycholo Assess 1989;1:266-272.
35. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian occupational performance measure, 3rd ed. Toronto: CAOT Publications ACE; 1998.
36. Forbes D. Goal Attainment Scaling: a responsive measure of client outcomes. J Gerontol Nurs 1998;24:34-40.
37. Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The AQOL instrument: a psychometric measure of HRQoL. Qual Life Res 1999;8:209-224.
38. Queensland Health [Internet]. Compendium of Clinical Measures for Community Rehabilitation: Qld Australia; 2008. Last accessed 20 Mar 2009; Available (in two parts) from http://www.health.qld.gov.au/qhcrwp/docs/clinical- measure. pdf; http://www.health.qld.gov.au/qhcrwp/docs/clinical-measure pt2.pdf
39. Herbert R. Outcome measures measure outcomes, not effects of intervention. Aust J Physiother 2005;51:3-4.
40. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, Foley N, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 27:315-340. (Pubitemid 40711579)
41. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, Foley N, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 27:507-528. (Pubitemid 40716304)