Diagnostic efficiency of multidetector computed tomography with multiplanar reformatted imaging and virtual cystoscopy in the assessment of bladder tumors after transurethral resection

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 121-126

  Koplay, Mustafa ^a   Kantarci, Mecit ^a   Güven, Fadime ^a   Aksoy, Yilmaz ^b   Taser, Figen ^b   Ziypak, Tevfik ^a   Eren, Suat ^b   Levent, Akin ^b   Atamanalp, Sabri Selcuk ^b  

^a DUMLUPINAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ATATURK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

MDCT; Transurethral resection; Urinary bladder tumors; Virtual cystoscopy

Indexed keywords

ENDOSCOPY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; TUMORS; VOLUME RENDERING;

BLADDER TUMOR; CYSTOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC EFFICIENCY; MEDICAL SYSTEMS; TOSHIBA; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTIONS; TUMOR DIAGNOSTICS; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY BLADDER TUMOR; VIRTUAL CYSTOSCOPIES;

EFFICIENCY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYSTOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY CYST; LIVER METASTASIS; LYMPHADENOPATHY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION;

EID: 76449104035     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181b728ae     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, et al.. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 1996;46:5-27.
2. Lammle M, Beer A, Settles M, et al.. Reliability of MR imagingYbased virtual cystoscopy in the diagnosis of cancer of the urinary bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1483-1488.
3. Denholm SW, Conn IG, Newsam JE, et al.. Morbidity following cystoscopy: comparison of flexible and rigid techniques. Br J Urol. 1990;66:152-154.
4. Clark KR, Higgs MJ. Urinary infection following out-patient flexible cystoscopy. Br J Urol. 1990;66:503-505.
5. Wilby D, Thomas K, Ray E, et al.. Bladder cancer: new TUR techniques. World J Urol. 2009;27:309-312.
6. Browne RF, Murphy SM, Grainger R, et al.. CT cystography and virtual cystoscopy in the assessment of new and recurrent bladder neoplasms. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53:147-153.
7. Fielding JR, Hoyte LX, Okon SA, et al.. Tumor detection by virtual cystoscopy with color mapping of bladder wall thickness. J Urol. 2002;167:559-562.
8. Medical electrical equipment: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for computed tomography (part 2-44). Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission, 1999. Publication no. 60601-2-44.
9. Fenlon HM, Bell TV, Ahari HK, et al.. Virtual cystoscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology. 1997;205:272-275.
10. Kundra V, Silverman PM. Imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of cancer of the urinary bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1045-1054.
11. Song JH, Francis IR, Platt JF, et al.. Bladder tumor detection at virtual cystoscopy. Radiology. 2001;218:95-100.
12. Kim JK, Ahn JH, Park T, et al.. Virtual cystoscopy of the contrast materialYfilled bladder in patients with gross hematuria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:763-768.
13. Higgins WE, Ramaswamy K, Swift RD, et al.. Virtual bronchoscopy for three-dimensional pulmonary image assessment: state of the art and future needs. Radiographics. 1998;18:761-778.
14. Vining DJ, Liu K, Choplin RH, et al.. Virtual bronchoscopy: relationships of virtual reality endobronchial simulations to actual bronchoscopic findings. Chest. 1996;109:549-553. (Pubitemid 26058617)
15. Vining DJ, Zagoria RJ, Liu K, et al.. CT cystoscopy: an innovation in bladder imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:409-410.
16. Narumi Y, Kumatani T, Sawai Y, et al.. The bladder and bladder tumors: imaging with three-dimensional display of helical CT data. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:1134-1135.
17. Tsampoulas C, Tsili AC, Giannakis D, et al.. 16-MDCT cystoscopy in the evaluation of neoplasms of the urinary bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:729-735.
18. Merkle EM, Wunderlich A, Aschoff AJ, et al.. Virtual cystoscopy based on helical CT scan datasets: perspectives and limitations. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:262-267.
19. Kim JK, Park SY, Kim HS, et al.. Comparison of virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reformation, and source CT images with contrast materialYfilled bladder for detecting lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:689-696.
20. Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, Argiro V, et al.. Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology. 1996;199:321-330.
21. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, et al.. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and methods. Radiographics. 1999;19:745-764.
22. Johnson PT, Heath DG, Bliss DF, et al.. Three-dimensional CT: real time interactive volume. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:581-583.
23. Hopper KD, Iyriboz AT, Wise SW, et al.. Mucosal detail at CT virtual reality: surface versus volume rendering. Radiology. 2000;214: 517-522.
24. Yazgan Ç, Fitoz S, Atasoy C, et al.. Virtual cystoscopy in the evaluation of bladder tumors. Clin Imaging. 2004;28:138-142.