Patient-based outcome assessment instruments in acupuncture research

Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 27-35

  Khorsan, Raheleh ^a,b   York, Alexandra ^c   Coulter, Ian D ^d,e,f   Wurzman, Rachel ^g   Walter, Joan A G ^c   Coeytaux, Remy R ^h,i  

^a Samueli Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c SAMUELI INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^e RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^f SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^g GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUPUNCTURE; ARTICLE; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 36; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ACUPUNCTURE THERAPY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESEARCH;

EID: 76449088610     PISSN: 10755535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/acm.2009.0316     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ware JE Jr, Brook RH, Davies AR, Lohr KN. Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations. Am J Public Health 1981;71:620-625.
2. Wollersheim H, Hermens R, Hulscher M, et al. Clinical indicators: Development and applications. Neth J Med 2007; 65:15-22.
3. Prady SL, Thomas K, Esmonde L, et al. The natural history of back pain after a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture vs usual care: Long term outcomes. Acupunct Med 2007;25:121-129.
4. Khorsan R, Coulter ID, Hawk C, Choate CG. Measures in chiropractic research: Choosing patient-based outcome assessments. J Manip Physiol Ther 2008;31:355-375.
5. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). An Introduction to Acupuncture. July 28, 2008. Online document at: http:==nccam.nih.gov=health= acupuncture= Accessed Aug 26, 2008.
6. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27:117-126.
7. McCaffery M, Pasero C. Assessment Tools. Pain: Clinical Manual. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999:58-88.
8. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976;2:175-184.
9. Flaherty SA. Pain measurement tools for clinical practice and research. AANA J 1996;64:133-140.
10. Ross MM, Rideout EM, Carson MM. The use of the diary as a data collection technique. West J Nurs Res 1994;16:414-425.
11. Russell MB, Rasmussen BK, Brennum J, et al. Presentation of a new instrument: The diagnostic headache diary. Cephalalgia 1992;12:369-374.
12. Coeytaux RR, Frasier PY, Reid A. Patient-centered outcomes for frequent headaches. Headache 2007;47:480-485.
13. Ware JE Jr. The SF-36 health survey. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:337-345.
14. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-483.
15. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:903-912.
16. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, et al. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: Summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995;33(suppl): AS264-A279.
17. Ware JE Jr. The status of health assessment 1994. Annu Rev Public Health 1995;16:327-354.
18. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277-299.
19. Peat G. PPA Recommendations for Low Back Pain-Related Functional Limitation Outcome Measures. London: The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, July 2004.
20. McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): A review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum 2001;45:453-461.
21. Bellamy N. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: Experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1989;18(suppl 2):14-17.
22. Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, et al. Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17:829-833.
23. Rothenfluh DA, Reedwisch D, Muller U, et al. Construct validity of a 12-item WOMAC for assessment of femoroacetabular impingement and osteoarthritis of the hip. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:1032-1038.
24. Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The Pain Disability Index: Psychometric properties. Pain 1990;40:171-182.
25. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:69-77.
26. Tang WK, Wong E, Chiu HF, et al. Examining item bias in the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2008;17: 104-110.
27. Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: A patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. BMJ 1996;312:1016-1020.
28. Hull SK, Page CP, Skinner BD, et al. Exploring outcomes associated with acupuncture. J Altern Complement Med 2006;12:247-254.
29. Boon H, Macpherson H, Fleishman S, et al. Evaluating complex healthcare systems: A critique of four approaches. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2007;4:279-285.
30. Fries JF, Bruce B, Cella D. The promise of PROMIS: Using item response theory to improve assessment of patientreported outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23(suppl 39):S53-S57.
31. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007;45(suppl 1):S3-S11.