Student absences during learning cycle phases: A technological alternative for make-up work in laboratory based high school chemistry

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1055-1068

  Marek, Edmund A ^a   Askey, David M ^b   Abraham, Michael R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b Norman High School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7644237014     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095006900429439     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ABRAHAM, M. R., (1989) Research on instruction strategies. Journal of College Science Teaching, 18, 185-187.
2. ABRAHAM, M. R. (1992) Instructional strategies designed to teach science concepts. In F. Lawrenz, K. Cochran, J. Krajcik, and P. Simpson (eds), Research matters. …. to the Science Teacher, monograph, number 5 (Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching), 41-50.
3. ABRAHAM, M. R. and RENNER, J. W. (1986) The sequence of learning cycle activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 121-143.
4. CENNAMO, K. S., SAVENYE, W. C. and SMITH, P. L. (1990) Can interactive video overcome the ‘couch potato’ syndrome? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 323 921).
5. CENNAMO, K. S. (1993) Students’ perceptions of the ease of learning from computers and interactive video: an exploratory study. Journal of Educational Technologies Systems, 21, 251-263.
6. HANNAFIN, M. J., HILL, J. R. and LAND, S. M. (1997) Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: status, issues, and implications. Contemporary Education, 68, 94-99.
7. HOLLIDAY, W. G. and MCGUIRE, B. (1992) How can comprehension adjunct questions focus students’ attention and enhance concept learning of a computer animated science lesson? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 3-15.
8. LAND, S. M. and HANNAFIN, M. J. (1997) The foundations and assumptions of technologyenhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202.
9. LAWSON, A. E. (1995) Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking (Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company).
10. LAWSON, A. E., ABRAHAM, M. R. and RENNER, J. W. (1989) A Theory of Instruction: using the Learning Cycle to Teach Science Concepts and Thinking Skills, monograph, number one (Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching), 1-131.
11. RENNER, J. W., ABRAHAM, MR. and BIRNIE, H. H. (1988) The necessity of each phase of the learning cycle in teaching high school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 39-58.
12. RENNER, J. W., FIX, W. T., ATKINSON, L. C., RENNER, M. J. and ABRAHAM, M. R. (1985) Investigations in Natural Science: Chemistry, Teacher’s Guide and Student Investigations and Readings (Norman: Science Education Centre, University of Oklahoma, revised edition, 1996).
13. SALOMON, G. (1984) Television is ‘easy’ and print is ‘tough’: the differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647-658.
14. SALOMON, G. and LEIGH, T. (1984) Predispositions about learning from print and television. Journal of Communication, 34, 119-135.
15. TOMEI, L. A. (1997) Instructional technology: pedagogy for the future. T.H.E. Journal, 25, 56-59.
16. ZIMMERMAN, L. W. (1997) Guidelines for using videos in the classroom. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 13, 32-33.