Prognosticfactors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: Is TNM (1997) staging relevant in Indian subpopulation?

Indian Journal of Cancer

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 99-103

  Srivastava, A ^a   Mandhani, A ^a   Kapoor, R ^a   Jain, M ^a   Dubey, D ^a   Raghavendra, M ^a   Kumar, A ^a  

^a SANJAY GANDHI POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Prognostic factors; Radical nephrectomy; Renal Cell carcinoma; TNM staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CANCER GRADING; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INDIA; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 7644234038     PISSN: 0019509X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. Results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1969;101:297-301.
2. Van Brussel JP, Mickisch GH. Prognostic factors in renal cell and bladder cancer. Br J Urol Int 1999;83:902-9.
3. Bonsib SM. Risk and prognosis in renal neoplasms. A pathologist's prospective. Urol Clin North Am 1999;26:643-60. Review.
4. Medeiros LJ, Gelb AB, Weiss LM. Renal cell carcinoma. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in 121 cases. Cancer 1988;61:1639-51.
5. Guinan P, Sobin LH, Algaba F, Badellino F, Kameyama S, MacLennan G, et al. TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: Workgroup No. 3. Union International Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer 1997;80:992-3.
6. Golimbu M, Joshi P, Sperber A, Tessler A, Al-Askari S, Morales P. Renal cell carcinoma: Survival and prognostic factors. Urology 1986;27:291.
7. Bretheau D, Lechevallier E, de Fromont M, Sault MC, Rampai M, Coulange C. Prognostic value of nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 1995;76:2543.
8. Tsui K, Shavarts O, Smith RB, Figlin RA, de Kernion JB, Belldegrun A. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: A multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol 2000;163:1090-5.
9. Ljungberg B, Forsslund G, Stenling R, Zetterberg A. Prognostic significance of the DNA content in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1986;135:422-6.
10. Murphy GF, Partin AW, Maygarden SJ, Mohler JL. Nuclear shape analysis for assessment of prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1990;143:1103.
11. Tsukamoto T, Kumamoto Y, Takahashi A, Yanase M, Yamazaki K, Miyao N, et al. Tumor size of renal cell carcinoma: Its clinical implication. Urol Int 1992;48:378-83.
12. Kessler O, Mukamel E, Hader H, Gillon G, Konchenzky M, Servadio C. Effect of improved diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma on the course of the disease. J Surg Oncol 1994;57:210.
13. Moch H, Gasser T, Amin MB, Torhorst J, Sauter G, Mihatsch MJ. Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma: A Swiss experience with 588 tumors. Cancer 2000;89:604-14.
14. Nativ O, Sabo E, Raviv G, Madjar S, Halachmi S, Moskovitz B. The impact of tumor size on clinical outcome in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy. J Urol 1997;158:729-32.
15. Yoshino S, Kato M, Okada K. Evaluation of the prognostic significance of microvessel count and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 1985:119-23.
16. Hafez KS, Fergany AF, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma:impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TMN staging. J Urol 1999;162:1930-3.
17. Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Chao D, Dorey F, Said JW, Gitlitz BJ, et al. Reevaluation of the 1997 TNM classification for renal cell carcinoma: T1 and T2 cutoff point at 4.5 cm rather than 7 cm better correlates with clinical outcome. J Urol 2001;166:54-8.
18. Igarashi T, Tobe T, Nakatsu HO, Suzuki N, Murakami S, Hamano M, et al. The impact of a 4 cm cutoff point for stratification of T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2001;165:1103-6.
19. th Ed. New York: Wiley-Liss 2003.
20. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6:655-63.
21. Grignon DJ, el-Naggar A, Green LK, Ayala AG, Ro JY, Swanson DA, et al. Role of nuclear grading in stage 1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 1989;34:310-5.
22. Thrasher JB, Paulson DF. Prognostic factors in renal cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1993;20:247-62.
23. th Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders 2002. p. 2705-7.
24. Lang H, Jacqmin D. Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma. EAU update series 2003;1:215-9.
25. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: An analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003;170:2217-20.
26. Ficarra V, Righetti R, Pilloni S, D'amico A, Maffei N, Novella G, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with renal call carcinoma: Retrospective analysis of 675 cases. Eur Urol 2002;41:190-8.
27. Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Frank I, Kwon ED, et al. Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer 2003;97:1663-71.
28. Bassil BA, Dosoretz DE, Pout GR. Validation of tumors, nodes and metastasis classification of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1985;134:450-4.