Clinical practice guidelines to improve shared decision-making about assistive device use in home care: A pilot intervention study

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 252-264

  Roelands, Marc ^a,c   Van Oost, Paulette ^a   Stevens, Veerle ^a   Depoorter, AnneMarie ^b   Buysse, Ann ^a  

^a Dept Exp Clin and Hlth Psychol ^*  (Belgium)

^b FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Assistive devices; Clinical practice guidelines; Controlled trial; Decision making; Theory of planned behaviour

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEVICE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSE ATTITUDE; PILOT STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BELGIUM; COMMUNICATION; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; DISABLED PERSONS; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HOME CARE SERVICES; HOME HEALTH AIDES; HUMANS; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF-HELP DEVICES;

EID: 7644232391     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. LaPlante M.P., Hendershot G.E., Moss A.J. The prevalence of need for assistive technology devices and home accessibility features. Technol. Disabil. 6:1997;17-28
2. Mann W.C., Hurren D., Tomita M. Comparison of assistive device use and needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 47:1993;980-987
3. Sonn U., Davegardh H., Lindskog A.C., Steen B. The use and effectiveness of assistive devices in an elderly urban population. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 8:1996;176-183
4. Roelands M., Van Oost P., Depoorter A.M., Buysse A. A social-cognitive model to predict the use of assistive devices for mobility and self-care in elderly people. Gerontologist. 42:2002;39-50
5. Gitlin L.N., Burgh D. Issuing assistive devices to older patients in rehabilitation: an exploratory study. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 49:1995;994-999
6. George J., Binns V.E., Clayden A.D., Mulley G.P. Aids and adaptations for the elderly at home: underprovided, underused, and undermaintained. Br. Med. J. 296:1988;1365-1366
7. Edwards N.I., Jones D.A. Ownership and use of assistive devices amongst older people in the community. Age Ageing. 27:1998;463-468
8. Pell S.D., Gillies R.M., Carss M. Use of technology by people with physical disabilities in Australia. Disabil. Rehabil. 21:1999;56-60
9. Gitlin L.N., Luborsky M.R., Schemm R.L. Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. Gerontologist. 38:1998;169-180
10. Pape T.L.-B., Kim J., Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil. Rehabil. 24:2002;5-20
11. Rogers J.C., Holm M.B. Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 46:1992;120-127
12. Scherer M, McKee B. But will the assistive technology device be used? In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Technology for the Next Decade. Washington: RESNA, 1989. p. 356-7.
13. Kraskowsky L.H., Finlayson M. Factors affecting older adults' use of adaptive equipment: review of the literature. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 55:2001;303-310
14. Aminzadeh F., Edwards N. Factors associated with cane use among community dwelling older adults. Publ. Health Nurs. 17:2000;474-483
15. Roelands M., Van Oost P., Buysse A., Depoorter A.M. Awareness among community-dwelling elderly of assistive devices of mobility and self-care and attitudes towards their use. Soc. Sci. Med. 54:2002;1441-1451
16. Ajzen I., Madden T.J. Prediction of goal-directed behavior - attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22:1986;453-474
17. Bynum H.S., Rogers J.C. The use and effectiveness of assistive devices possessed by patients seen in home care. Occup. Ther. J. Res. 7:1987;181-191
18. Caudrey D.J., Seeger B.R. Rehabilitation engineering service evaluation. A follow-up survey of device effectiveness and patient acceptance. Rehab. Lit. 44:1983;80-85
19. Gitlin L.N., Levine R., Geiger C. Adaptive device use by older adults with mixed disabilities. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74:1993;149-152
20. Roelands M., Van Oost P. De introductie van hulpmiddelen bij thuiswonende bejaarden door verpleegkundigen: taakopvatting en knelpunten (Nurses introduction of assistive devices in community-dwelling elderly persons: beliefs and barriers). Verpleegk. 13:1999;195-208
21. O'Day B.L., Corcoran P.J. Assistive technology: problems and policy alternatives. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75:1994;1165-1169
22. Seelman K.D. Assistive technology policy: a road to independence for individuals with disabilities. J. Soc. Issues. 49:1993;115-136
23. Patterson J.B., Marks C. The client as customer: achieving service quality and customer satisfaction in rehabilitation. J. Rehabil. 58:1992;16-21
24. Reed B.J., Fried J.H., Rhoades B.J. Empowerment and assistive technology: the local resource team model. J. Rehabil. 61:1995;30-35
25. Sprague J., Hayes J. Self-determination and empowerment: a feminist standpoint analysis of talk about disability. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 28:2000;671-695
26. Roelands M, Van Oost P, Buysse A, Stevens V, Depoorter AM. Determinants of formal caregivers' current practices regarding optimizing the use of assistive devices in community-dwelling elderly, submitted for publication.
27. Sax C.L. Assistive technology education: an online model for rehabilitation professionals. Disabil. Rehabil. 24:2002;144-151
28. Scherer M.J., Cushman L.A. Determining the content for an interactive training programme and interpretative guidelines for the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disabil. Rehabil. 24:2002;126-130
29. Levine R.E., Gitlin L.N. Home adaptations for persons with chronic disabilities: an educational model. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 44:1990;923-929
30. Beghi E., Citterio A., Cornelio F., Fillipini G., Grilli R., Liberati A. Practice guidelines: a more rational approach to diagnosis and treatment and a more effective use of health care resources. Ital. J. Neurol. Sci. 19:1998;120-123
31. Caro J.J. Introduction: practice guidelines. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care. 16:2000;957-958
32. Keffer J.H. Guidelines and algorithms: perceptions of why and when they are successful and how to improve them. Clin. Chem. 47:2001;1563-1572
33. Daniëls R, Oosterheert GE, Schippers AM. Cursus hulpmiddelen en woningaanpassing voor de wijkverpleging (Assistive devices and home adaptations: a course for home nurses). Utrecht: NIZW, 1995.
34. Kosecoff J., Hanouse D.E., Rogers W.H., McCloskey L., Winslow C.M., Brook R.H. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practices. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 258:1987;2708-2713
35. Cabana M.D., Rand C.S., Powe N.R., Wu A.W., Wilson M.H., Abboud P.C. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? J. Am. Med. Assoc. 282:1999;1458-1465
36. Smith W.R. Evidence for the effectiveness of techniques to change physician behavior. Chest. 118:2000;8s-17s
37. Browman G.P. Improving clinical practice guidelines for the 21st century. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health C. 16:2000;959-968
38. Bartholomew L.K., Parcel G.S., Kok G. Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs. Health Educ. Behav. 25:1998;545-563
39. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, editors. Action-control: from cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer, 1985. p. 11-39.