Adhesion formation after uterine horn resection in rabbit model: Comparative study of laparoscopic procedure vs. laparotomy

Gynaecological Endoscopy

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 365-369

  Telles De Sousa, Iuri Donati ^a   Candido Dos Reis, Francisco José ^a,b   Garcia, Sérgio Brito ^a   Nogueira, Antonio Alberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adhesions; Fibrous tissue; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Mesothelial hyperplasia

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MESOTHELIUM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; UTERUS HORN; UTERUS SURGERY;

EID: 7644228385     PISSN: 09621091     EISSN: 13652508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2508.2002.00551.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Miller EM, Winfield JM. Acute intestinal obstruction secondary to postoperative adhesions. Archives of Surgery 1959; 170: 148-53.
2. Bronson RA, Wallach EE. Lysis of periadnexal adhesions for correction of infertility. Fertility and Sterility 1977; 28: 613-19.
3. Kresch AJ, Seifer DB, Sachs LB, Barrese I. Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1984; 64: 672-4.
4. Stout AL, Steege JF, Dodson WC, Hughes CL. Relationship of laparoscopic findings to self-report of pelvic pain. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991; 146: 73-9.
5. Howard FM. The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: promise and pitfalls. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 1993; 48: 357-8.
6. Strickler B, Blanco J, Fox HE. The gynecologic contribution to intestinal obstruction in females. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1994; 178: 617-21.
7. Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Ellis H, O'Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM. The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000; 107: 855-62.
8. Coleman MG, McLain AD, Moran BJ. Impact of previous surgery on time taken for incision and division of adhesions during laparotomy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2000; 43: 1297-9.
9. Ray NF, Larsen JW, Stillman RJ, Jacobs RL. Economic impact of hospitalizations for lower abdominal adhesiolysis in the United States in 1988. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1993; 176: 271-6.
10. D'Hooghe TM, Bambra CS, Raeymaekers BM, Hill JA. Pelvic inflammation induced by diagnostic laparoscopy in baboons. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 72: 1134-41.
11. Luciano AA, Maier DB, Koch EI, Nulsen JC, Whitman GF. A comparative study of postoperative adhesions following laser surgery by laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the rabbit model. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989; 74: 220-4.
12. Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L, Büchler MW. Comparison of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic surgery. Digestive Surgery 1998; 15: 148-52.
13. Filmar S, Gomel V, McComb PF. Operative laparoscopy versus open abdominal surgery: a comparative study on postoperative adhesion formation in the rat model. Fertility and Sterility 1987; 48: 486-9.
14. Jorgensen JO, Lalak NJ, Hunt DR. Is laparoscopy associated with a lower rate of postoperative adhesions than laparotomy? A comparative study in the rabbit. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 1995; 65: 342-4.
15. Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Källfelt B, Thorburn J, Lindblom B. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy, a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertility and Sterility 1991; 55: 911-5.
16. Bulleti C, Polli V, Negrini V, Giacomucci E, Flamigni C. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy. Journal ofthe American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1996; 3: 533-6.
17. Levrant SG, Bieber EJ, Bames RB. Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1997; 4: 353-6.
18. Blauer KL, Collins RL. The effect of intraperitoneal progesterone on postoperative adhesion formation in rabbits. Fertility and Sterility 1988; 49: 144-9.
19. Volz J, Koster S, Leweling H. Surgical trauma and metabolic changes induced by surgical laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Gynaecological Endoscopy 1997; 6: 1-6.
20. Volz J, Köster S, Weiss M, et al. Pathophysiologic features of a pneumoperitoneum at laparoscopy. a swine model. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; 174: 132-40.
21. West MA, Hackam DJ, Baker J, Rodriguez JL, Bellingham J, Rotstein OD. Mechanism of decreased in vitro murine macrophage cytokine release after exposure to carbon dioxide. Relevance to laparoscopic surgery. Annals of Surgery 1997; 226: 179-90.
22. Ryan GB, Grobety J, Majno G. Mesothelial injury and recovery. American Journal of Pathology 1973; 71: 93-112.
23. 2 insufflation and irrigation on peritoneal microcirculation assessed by free radical scavengers and total glutathion levels during operative laparoscopy. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1998; 5: 129-33.
24. Taskin O, Sadik S, Onoglu A, et al. Adhesion formation after microlaparoscopic and laparoscopic ovarian coagulation for polycystic ovary disease. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1999; 6: 159-63.
25. Haney AF. Peritoneal fluid. In: di Zerega, GS, ed. Peritoneal Surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999: 39-49.
26. Fukasawa M, Campeau JD, Yanagihara DL, Rogers KE, di Zerega GS. Mitogenic and protein synthetic activity of tissue repair cells: control by the postsurgical macrophage. Journal of Investigative Surgery 1989; 2: 169-80.
27. Mutsaers SE, Whitaker D, Papadimitriou JM. Mesothelial regeneration is not dependent on subserosal cells. Journal of Pathology 2000; 190: 86-92.