Lawsuits and secondhand smoke

Tobacco Control

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages

  Sweda Jr , E L ^a  

^a Tobacco Control Resource Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSAULT; COMPENSATION; CUSTODY; DISABILITY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEM; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRISONER; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; SMOKE; SOCIETY; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

ADULT; CHILD; CHILD CUSTODY; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HOUSING; HUMANS; MALE; MALPRACTICE; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION; UNITED STATES; WORKERS' COMPENSATION;

EID: 7644226352     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2003.004457     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Shimp v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co., 368 A.2d 408 (New Jersey Superior Court 1976).
2. US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary smoking. A report of the Surgeon General 1986. Rockville, Maryland: Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, 1986. (DHHS Publication No (CDC) 87-8398.)
3. Husain, et al. v. Olympic Airways, 116 F. Supp.2d 1121 (United States District Court, Northern District of California 2000).
4. Husain, et al. v. Olympic Airways, 316 F.3d 829 (United States Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2002).
5. Magaw v. Middletown Board of Education, New Jersey Department of Labor, Division of Workers' Compensation, Claim Petition No. 95-005466, New Jersey, 1998.
6. Magaw v. Middletown Board of Education 731 A.2d 1196 (Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division 1999).
7. Magaw v. Middletown Board of Education, New Jersey Department of Labor, Division of Workers' Compensation, 744 A.2d 1208 (New Jersey Supreme Court, 1999).
8. Ubhi v. State Compensation Insurance Fund, Cat'n'Fiddle Restaurant, No. SFO-0341691 (California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board 1990).
9. Staron, et al. v. McDonald's Corp., 872 F. Supp. 1092 (United States District Court, District of Connecticut 1993).
10. Staron, et al. v. McDonald's Corp., et al., 51 F.3d 353 (United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1995).
11. PR Newswire. U.S. Court of Appeals allows nonsmokers to use Americans With Disabilities Act to clear the air in restaurants. Tobacco Products Liability Project, April 7, 1995.
12. Homeyer v. Stanley Tulchin Associates, Inc., et al., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17114 (United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois 1995).
13. Homeyer v. Stanley Tulchin Associates, Inc., et al., 91 F.3d 959 (United States Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 1996).
14. Bond v. Sheahan, 152 F. Supp.2d 1055 (United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois 2001).
15. Zimmerman v. Department of Corrections, 2002 Mich. App. LEXIS 1419 (Court of Appeals of Michigan 2002).
16. 50-58 Gainsborough St. Realty Trust v. Haile, et al., 13.4 Tobacco Products Litigation Reporter 2.302, No. 98-02279 (Boston (MA) Housing Court 1998).
17. Kline RL. Smoke knows no boundaries: legal strategies for environmental tobacco smoke incursions into the home within multi-unit residential dwellings. Tobacco Control 2000;9:201-5.
18. Inman B. Amended Fair Housing Act takes on new discrimination. San Francisco Examiner, January 15, 1995, E-1.
19. Daniel v. Daniel, 509 S.E.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia 1998).
20. Skidmore-Shafer v. Shafer, 770 So.2d 1097 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama 1999).
21. In Re. Julie Anne, A Minor Child, 121 Ohio Misc. 2d 20 (Ohio Court of Common Pleas 2002).
22. In re. Guardianship of a Minor Child, Probate and Family Court Dept., No. 01P1072 (Hampden (MA) Division, 2003).
23. McKinney v. Anderson, et al., 924 F.2d 1500, 6.2 TPLR 2.327 (United States Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1991).
24. Helling v. McKinney, 113 S.Ct. 2475, 509 U.S. 25, 125 L. Ed.2d 22, 61 LW 4648, 8.2 TPLR 2.201 (United States Supreme Court 1993).
25. th Circuit 2001).
26. rd Circuit 2003).
27. Leichtman v. WLW Jacor Communications, Inc., et al., 634 N.E.2d 697 (Court of Appeals, First Appellate District of Ohio 1994).
28. th Florida Circuit Court, Miami 1991).
29. Broin, et al. v. Philip Morris Companies Inc., et al., 9.6 TPLR 2.161 (Circuit Court for Dade County (Florida) 1994).
30. Sweda E. Landmark class-action suit puts secondhand smoke on trial; settlement announced. http://www.tobacco.neu.edu/tcu/12-97/landmark_class.htm.
31. Philip Morris Inc., et al. v. Broin., et al., 672 So.2d 37, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 49 (District Court of Appeals of Florida, Third District 1996).
32. Sweda E. Landmark class-action suit puts secondhand smoke on trial; settlement announced. http://www.tobacco.neu.edu/tcu/12-97/landmark_class.htm.
33. I b i d.
34. I b i d.
35. Sweda EL. Litigation on behalf of victims of environmental tobacco smoke, the experience from the USA. Eur J Public Health 2001;11:201-5.
36. Daynard RA. How did we get here? Tobacco Control 2004;13:i3.
37. Halbfinger D. Antismoking measures gain in heart of tobacco country. New York Times, March 4, 2003, A1.