Concavity of utility, concavity of welfare, and redistribution of income

International Tax and Public Finance

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 25-42

  Kaplow, Louis ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Concavity; Inequality; Optimal income taxation; Redistribution; Social welfare function

Indexed keywords

EID: 76349121517     PISSN: 09275940     EISSN: 15736970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10797-008-9097-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, II, 244-263.
2. Atkinson, A. B. (1973). How progressive should income tax be?. In F. Parkin & A. R. Nobay (Eds.), Essays on modern economics (pp. 90-109). London: Longman.
3. Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). Lectures on public economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXII, 537-579.
5. Blackorby, C., Bossert, W., & Donaldson, D. (1999). Income inequality measurement: the normative approach. In J. Silber (Ed.), Handbook of income inequality measurement (pp. 133-157). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
6. Boskin, M. J., & Sheshinski, E. (1978). Optimal redistributive taxation when individual welfare depends upon relative income. Quarterly Journal of Economics, XCII, 589-601.
7. Campbell, J. Y. (1996). Understanding risk and return. Journal of Political Economy, CIV, 298-345.
8. Chetty, R. (2006). A new method of estimating risk aversion. American Economic Review, XCVI, 1821-1834.
9. Choi, E. K., & Menezes, C. F. (1992). Is relative risk aversion greater than one?. International Review of Economics and Finance, I, 43-54.
10. Harsanyi, J. C. (1953). Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking. Journal of Political Economy, LXI, 434-435.
11. Harsanyi, J. C. (1955). Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy, LXIII, 309-321.
12. Hochman, H. M., & Rodgers, J. D. (1969). Pareto optimal redistribution. American Economic Review, LIX, 542-557.
13. Kaplow, L. (2005a). The value of a statistical life and the coefficient of relative risk aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, XXXI, 23-34.
14. Kaplow, L. (2005b). Why measure inequality? Journal of Economic Inequality, III, 65-79.
15. Kaplow, L. (2008). The theory of taxation and public economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16. Kaplow, L., & Shavell, S. (2001). Any non-welfarist method of policy assessment violates the Pareto principle. Journal of Political Economy, CIX, 281-286.
17. Kocherlakota, N. R. (1996). The equity premium: it's still a puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIV, 42-71.
18. Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). An exploration in the theory of optimal income taxation. Review of Economic Studies, XXXVIII, 175-208.
19. Mirrlees, J. A. (1982). The economic uses of utilitarianism. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 63-84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Myles, G. D. (1995). Public economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22. Singer, P. (1988). Reasoning towards utilitarianism. In D. Seanor & N. Fotion (Eds.), Hare and critics: essays on moral thinking (pp. 147-159). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. Slemrod, J., Yitzhaki, S., Mayshar, J., & Lundholm, M. (1994). The optimal two-bracket linear income tax. Journal of Public Economics, LIII, 269-290.
24. Smart, J. J. C. (1973). An outline of a system of utilitarian ethics. In J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: for and against (pp. 3-74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Stern, N. H. (1976). On the specification of models of optimum income taxation. Journal of Public Economics, VI, 123-162.
26. Tuomala, M. (1990). Optimal income tax and redistribution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.