Determine sis and SIL using HAZOPS

Process Safety Progress

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 22-31

  Cruz Campa, Héctor Javier ^a   Cruz Gómez, M Javier ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Hazard and operability; Layers of protection analysis; Policy; Risk; Safety instrumented systems; Safety integrity levels

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; HAZARDS; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; RISKS;

COMMODITY CHEMICALS; HAZARD AND OPERABILITIES; LAYERS OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS; RISK ACCEPTABILITY; SAFETY INSTRUMENTED FUNCTION; SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEMS; SAFETY INTEGRITY LEVELS; SAFETY PROTECTION;

SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 76349121107     PISSN: 10668527     EISSN: 15475913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prs.10293     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals, 29 CRF 1910, 119, United States Code of Federal Regulations, 1992.
2. International Electrotechnical Commission, Functional Safety-Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector, IEC 61511, IEC, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
3. ANSI/ISA-84.00.01-2004 (IEC 61511 mod), Functional Safety-Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector, ISA, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.
4. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA): Simplified Process Risk Assessment, AIChE, New York, 2001.
5. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Analysis, Second Edition, New York, 2000.
6. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), Guidelines for Process Equipment Reliability Dates with Tables it Dates, New York, 1989.