Effectiveness of different final irrigation protocols in removing debris in flattened root canals

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 211-214

  Nadalin, Michele Regina ^a   Perez, Danyel Elias da Cruz ^a   Vansan, Luiz Pascoal ^a   Paschoalato, Cristina ^a   Sousa Neto, Manoel Damião ^b   Saquy, Paulo César ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RIBEIRÃO PRETO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Endodontics; Instrumentation; Methods; Sodium hypochlorite

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; HYPOCHLORITE SODIUM;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; SYRINGE; TIME; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH ROOT;

DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HUMANS; INCISOR; MANDIBLE; ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SMEAR LAYER; SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE; SYRINGES; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH APEX;

EID: 76349111601     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: 18064760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000300007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baratto-Filho F, Leonardi DP, Zielak JC, Vanni JR, Sayão-Maia SM, Sousa-Neto MD. Influence of ProTaper finishing files and sodium hypochlorite on cleaning and shaping of mandibular central incisors-a histological analysis. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:229-233.
2. Williamson AE, Sandor AJ, Justman BC. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability. J Endod 2009;35:107-109.
3. Rödig T, Hülsmann M, Kahlmeier C. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi-instruments: ProFile-.04 and GT Rotary. Int Endod J 2007;40:553-562.
4. Fariniuk LF, Baratto-Filho F, Cruz-Filho AM, Sousa-Neto MD. Histologic analysis of the cleaning capacity of mechanical endodontic instruments activated by the ENDOflash system. J Endod 2003;29:651-653.
5. Rödig T, Hülsmann M, Mühge M, Schäfers F. Quality of preparation of oval distal root canals in mandibular molars using nickeltitanium instruments. Int Endod J 2002;35:919-928.
6. Baratto-Filho F, Carvalho Jr. JR, Fariniuk LF, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD, Cruz-Filho AM. Morphometric analysis of the effectiveness of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite associated with rotary instrumentation for root canal cleaning. Braz Dent J 2004;15:36-40.
7. Scelza MFZ, Antoniazzi JH, Scelza P. Efficacy of final irrigation - a scanning electron microscopic evaluation. J Endod 2000;26:355-358.
8. Spanó JCE, Barbin EL, Santos TC, Guimarães LF, Pécora JD. Solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on bovine pulp and physicochemical properties of resulting liquid. Braz Dent J 2002;12:154-179.
9. Van der Sluis LW, Gambarini G, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J 2006;39:472-476.
10. Cameron JA. The choice of irrigant during hand instrumentation and ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Aust Dent J 1995;40:85-90.
11. Setlock J, Fayad MI, Begole E, Bruzick M. Evaluation of canal cleanliness and smear layer removal after the use of the Quantec- E irrigation system and syringe: a comparative scanning electron microscope study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:614-617.
12. Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Turaiki SA, Al-Sulami U, Saad AY. Efficacy of a new brush-covered irrigation needle in removing root canal debris: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2006;32:1181-1184.
13. Passarinho-Neto JG, Marchesan MA, Ferreira RB, Silva RG, Silva-Sousa YTC, Sousa-Neto MD. In vitro evaluation of endodontic debris removal as obtained by rotary instrumentation coupled with ultrasonic irrigation. Aust Endod J 2006;32:123-128.
14. Van der Sluis LW, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The evaluation of removal of calcium hydroxide paste from an artificial standardized groove in the apical root canal using different irrigation methodologies. Int Endod J 2007;40:52-57.
15. Qing Y, Akita Y, Kawano S, Kawazu S, Yoshida T, Sekine I. Cleaning efficacy and dentin micro-hardness after root canal irrigation with a strong acid electrolytic water. J Endod 2006;32:1102-1106.
16. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis C, Kastrinakis E, Bekiaroglou P. Mensurement of pressure and flow rates during irrigation of a root canal ex vivo with three endodontic needles. Int Endod J 2007;40:504-513.
17. Albrecht LJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Evaluation of apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile GT files. J Endod 2004;30:425-428.
18. Sedgley CM, Nagel AC, Hall D, Applegate B. Influence of irrigant needle depth in removing bioluminescent bacteria inoculated into instrumented root canals using real-time imaging in vitro. Int Endod J 2005;38:97-104.
19. Gambarini G. Shaping and cleaning the root canal system: a scanning electron microscopic evaluation of a new instrumentation and irrigation technique. J Endod 1999;25:800-803.
20. Usman N, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Influence of instrument size on root canal debridement. J Endod 2004;30:110-112.