Magnetophotocurrent effect in organic photovoltaic cells at low temperatures

Synthetic Metals

Volumn 160, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 256-261

  Tajima, H ^a   Miyakawa, M ^a   Isozaki, H ^a   Yasui, M ^a   Suzuki, N ^a   Matsuda, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Low temperature; Magnetic field; Magnetophotocurrent; MIM junctions; Photovoltaic effect

Indexed keywords

APPLIED MAGNETIC FIELDS; CONTINUOUS LIGHT; LIGHT ILLUMINATION; LOW TEMPERATURE; LOW TEMPERATURES; ORGANIC PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; PHOTO-INDUCED CHARGE; PHOTOCURRENT RESPONSE; POLY-3-HEXYLTHIOPHENE; TEMPERATURE RANGE; TRAPPED CARRIERS;

MAGNETIC MATERIALS; MIM DEVICES; PHOTOCURRENTS; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECTS; ZINC; ZINC COMPOUNDS;

MAGNETIC FIELDS;

EID: 76349110119     PISSN: 03796779     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2009.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. In: Brabec C.J., Dyakonov V., Parisi J., and Sariciffci N.N. (Eds). For example, Organic Photovoltaics: Concepts and Realization (2003), Springer, Berlin
2. Kim J.Y., Lee K., Coates N.E., Moses D., Nguyen T.Q., Dante M., and Heeger A.J. Science 317 (2007) 222
3. Suzuki N., Miyakawa M., Matsuda M., and Tajima H. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76 (2007) 023709
4. Frankevich E.L., Lymarev A.A., Sokolik I., Karasz F.E., Blumstengel S., Baughman R.H., and Hörhold H.H. Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 9320
5. Kalinowski J., Cocchi M., Virgili D., Marco P.D., and Fattori V. Chem. Phys. Lett. 380 (2003) 710
6. Francis T.L., Mermer O., Veeraraghavar G., and Wohlgennant M. New J. Phys. 6 (2004) 185
7. Davis A.H., and Bussmann K. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 22 (2004) 1885
8. Prigodin V.N., Bergeson J.D., Lincoln D.M., and Epstein A.J. Synth. Met. 156 (2006) 757
9. Ito F., Ikoma T., Akiyama K., and Tero-Kubota S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 411 (2005) 378
10. Odaka H., Okimoto Y., Yamada T., Okamoto H., Kawasaki M., and Tokura Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 123501
11. Xu Z., Wu Y., and Hu B. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 131116
12. Desai P., Shakya P., Kreouzis T., Gillin W.P., Morley N.A., and Gibbs M.R.J. Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 094423
13. Meruvia M.S., Freire J.A., Hummelgen I.A., Gruber J., and Graeff C.F.O. Org. Electron. 8 (2007) 695
14. Bloom F.L., Wagemans W., Kemerink M., and Koopmans B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 257201
15. Majumdar S., Majumdar H.S., Aarnio H., Vanderzande D., Laiho R., and Osterbacka R. Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009) 201202
16. Bobbert P.A., Nguyen T.D., van Oost F.W.A., Koopmans B., and Wohlgenannt M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 216801
17. Kim Y., Choulis S.A., Nelson J., Bradley D.D.C., Cook S., and Durrant J.R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 (2005) 063502
18. See the supplemental figures. The relative intensity of the light as a function of chopping frequency is almost constant (I(f)/I(f = 0 Hz) > 0.995) in the frequency range below f < 100 kHz.
19. The light intensity in the active layer near the Al electrode is considerably decreased in the device. For example, see O. Inganäs and L.S. Roman, Chap. 6, in Ref. 1.
20. Mozer A.J., Dennler G., Sariciffci N.N., Westerling M., Pivrikas A., Österbacka R., and Juška G. Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 035217