Development of a depletion indicator for natural resources used in concrete

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 364-376

  Habert, G ^a   Bouzidi, Y ^b   Chen, C ^a   Jullien, A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE TROYES   (France)

^c DDGC   (France)

Author keywords

Building materials; Methodology; Resources; Stock assessment

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE MANUFACTURE; GLOBAL RESOURCES; GLOBAL SCALE; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LONG DISTANCES; REGIONAL SCALE; RESOURCE CONSUMPTION; RESOURCE EXTRACTION; SPECIFIC MATERIALS; TEMPORAL EVOLUTION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

CONCRETE INDUSTRY; CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT;

BUILDING MATERIALS;

CONCRETE; CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RESOURCE DEPLETION; STOCK ASSESSMENT; TEMPORAL EVOLUTION;

ARTICLE; BUILDING MATERIAL; CONSTRUCTION WORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FRANCE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; STOCK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

FRANCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 76349097576     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ayres R. Industrial metabolism. In: Ausubel J. (Ed). Technology and environment (1989), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
2. Barles S, 2007a. Measuring ecological performances of towns and territories: Parisian and Ile de France metabolism (in French). Report for Paris city, Convention DASCO/2004-168, 83 pp.
3. Barles S. A material flow analysis of Paris and its region, in renewables in a changing climate-innovation in the built environment. Proceedings of CISBAT 2007, International Conference Organised by Solar Energy and Building Physics Laboratory (LESO-PB) and Ecole polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPLF). EPLF, Lausanne, Switzerland, Lausanne, EPLF, September 4-5, 2007 (2007) 579-584
4. Barles S. Feeding the city: food consumption and flow of nitrogen, Paris, 1801-1914. Sci. Total Environ. 375 (2007) 48-58
5. Braunschweig A, Bär P, Rentsch C, Schmid L, Wüest G, 1998. Bewertung in Ökobilanzen mit der Methode der ökologischen Knappheit. Ökofaktoren 1997, Methodik Für Oekobilanzen. Buwal Schriftenreihe Umwelt, 297. 100 pp.
6. Castéran B, Ricroch L, 2008. Les logements en 2006 Le confort s'améliore, mais pas pour tous. INSEE première, 1202, 4 pp.
7. Doughty M.R.C., and Hammond G.P. Sustainability and the built environment at and beyond the city scale. Build Environ. 39 (2004) 1223-1233
8. DRIRE, Direction Régionale pour l'Industrie, la Recherche et l'Environnement, 1999. Schéma interrégional d'approvisionnement du Bassin parisien en matériaux de construction, 34 pp.
9. DRIRE, Direction Régionale pour l'Industrie, la Recherche et l'Environnement, 2001. Synthèse régionale des schémas départementaux en Ile-de-France, 30 pp.
10. EUROSTAT, 2001. Economy wide material flow accounts and balances with derived resource use indicators. A methodological guide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.
11. Fava J.A. Will the next 10 years be as pructive in advancing life cycle approaches as the last 15 years?. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 11 (2006) 116-122
12. Girardet H. The Gaia atlas of cities: new directions for sustainable urban living (1992), Gaia Books, London
13. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R, 2001. The Eco-indicator 99, a damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, methodology report. PRé Consultants B.V. 132 pp. http://www.pre.nl.
14. Guinée J.B., Gorrée M., Heijungs R., Huppes G., Kleijn R., van Oers L., Sleeswijk A., Suh S., Udo de Haes H.A., de Bruijn H., van Duin R., and Huijbregts M.A.J. Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO Standards (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (NL)
15. Guinée JB, 1995. Development of a methodology for the environmental life-cycle assessment of products; with a case study on margarines. Thesis, Leiden University.
16. Haberl H. The energetic metabolism of societies. Part II. Empirical examples. J. Ind. Ecol. 5 (2001) 71-88
17. Hauschild M., and Wenzel H. Environmental Assessment of Products, vol. 2: Scientific Background (1998), Chapman & Hall, London (UK)
18. IFEN, Institut Français de l'Environnement, 2008. Productivité des ressources, 11 indicateurs de développement durable. http://www.ifen.fr/.
19. IFF, Fakultät für interdisziplinäre Forschung und Fortbildung, Institut für soziale ökologie, 2004. Development of material use in the EU-15: 1970-2001. Type of materials, cross-country comparison and indicator improvement. Draft for Eurostat, Wien, IFF, 90 p.
20. IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K.B., Tignor M., and Miller H.L. (Eds). Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA 18
21. ISO, International Organisation for Standardisation, 1997. ISO 14040: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and framework. Geneva.
22. Jacquot A, 2007. La demande potentielle de logements: un chiffrage à l'horizon 2020. Notes de synthèse du SESP, 165, 41-48.
23. Jolliet O., Margni M., Charles R., Humbert S., Payet J., Rebitzer G., and Rosenbaum R. IMPACT 2002+: A New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology. Int J Life Cycle Ass 10 (2003) 324-330
24. Jullien A., Moneron P., Quaranta G., and Gaillard D. A study on air emissions from pavement layings made of different reclaimed asphalt rates. Resour Conserv Recy 47 (2006) 356-374
25. Köllner T. Species-pool effect potentials (SPEP) as a yardstick to evaluate land-use impacts on biodiversity. J Clean Prod 8 (2000) 293-311
26. Krausmann F., Haberl H., Erb K.-H., and Wackernagel M. Resource flows and land use in Austria 1950-2000: using the MEFA framework to monitor society-nature interaction for sustainability. Land use policy 21 (2004) 215-230
27. Levy Salomon M., and Helene P. Durability of recycled aggregates concrete: a safe way to sustainable development. Cement Concrete Res 34 (2004) 1975-1980
28. Meadows D. Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. A report to the Balaton Group (1998), Sustainability Institute, USA 78 pp
29. Meijer J. Ecoconcrete tool, INTRON BV; 2004.
30. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis (2005), Island Press, Washington, DC 155 pp
31. Nixon S., Trent Z., Marcuello C., and Lallana C. Europe's water: an indicator-based assessment (2003), European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark
32. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004. Recommendation on material flows and resource productivity. Adopted by OECD council on 21 April 2004, Paris.
33. Rees W. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4 (1992) 121-130
34. Rees W., and Wackernagel M. Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable-and why they are the key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Asses 16 (1996) 223-248
35. SETAC Consoli, Allen, Boustead, de Oude, Fava, Franklin, Quay, Parrrish, Perriman, Postlethwaite, Seguin, Vigon, 1993. Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A 'Code of Practice', Sesimbra Workshop. SETAC Brussels.
36. SFIC. Syndicat français de l'industrie cimentiaire, 1973-2007. Activity reports. SFIC.
37. Steen B, 1999. A Systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS). 2000-General System Characteristics & 2000-Models and Data. Chalmers, CPM Report: 1999, 4-5, http://eps.esa.chalmers.se/download.htm.
38. Stern N. The economics of climate change. The Stern review (2007), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
39. Surschiste, 2009. Société Nationale d'Electricité et de Thermique, http://www.surschiste.com.
40. Tomosawa F., Noguchi T., and Tamura M. The way concrete recycling should be. J Adv Concrete Technol 3 (2005) 3-16
41. UNICEM, Union Nationale des Industries de Carrières et Matériaux de Construction, 1996. Livret introductif: Enjeux et axes de développement. In: Guides techniques pour l'utilisation des matériaux régionaux d'Ile-de-France, 30 pp.
42. UNICEM, Union Nationale des Industries de Carrières et Matériaux de Construction, 2005. Granulats en Ile de France. Mieux prendre en compte la ressource en matériaux dans les documents d'urbanisme. UNICEM Ile-de-France, 36 pp.
43. US-EPA, United State Environmental Protection Agency, 1993. Life Cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles, EPA/600/R-92/245, Washington, DC, US.
44. US-EPA, United State Environmental Protection Agency, 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R095/002F, Washington, DC, US.
45. USGS, United States Geological Survey, 2008. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals.
46. Valenzuela Montes L.M., and Mataran Ruiz A. Environmental indicators to evaluate spatial and water planning in the coast of Granada (Spain). Land Use Policy 25 (2008) 95-105
47. Van Oers L., Koning A.d., Guinée J.B., and Huppes G. Improving characterisation factors for abiotic resource depletion as recommended in the new Dutch LCA Handbook. Roads and Hydraulic Engineering Institute. (2002) 75
48. Ventura A., Moneron P., and Jullien A. Environmental impact of a binding course pavement section, with asphalt recycled at varying rates-use of Life Cycle Methodology. Road Mater Pavement, Special Issue EATA 2008 9 (2008) 319-338
49. Vestergaard C.N., and Glavind M. Danish experiences with a decade of green concrete. J Adv Con Technol 5 (2007) 3-12
50. Wilson A., and Boehland J. Small is beautiful, U.S. house size, resource use and the environment. J Ind Ecol 9 (2005) 277-287
51. Xing S., Xu Z., and Jun G. Inventory analysis of LCA on steel- and concrete-construction office buildings. Energ Buildings 40 (2008) 1188-1193