The environmental implications of airlines' choice of aircraft size

Journal of Air Transport Management

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 159-167

  Givoni, Moshe ^a   Rietveld, Piet ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Air transport; Aircraft environmental impact; Aircraft size; Airline operation

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; AIRLINE INDUSTRY; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); COMPETITIVENESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; NOISE POLLUTION; POLLUTION TAX;

EID: 76349090219     PISSN: 09696997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2009.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AEA Energy & Environment, 2007. Revised Emissions Methodology for Heathrow. Report to the Department for Transport, AEAT/ENV/R/2193 Final, Warrington.
2. Airbus. Flying by Nature: Global Market Forecast 2007-2026 (2007), Airbus S.A.S, Blagnac Cedex
3. x, OIES Papers on Energy and the Environment (1993), Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford
4. Brueckner J.K., and Girvin R. Airport noise regulation, airline service quality, and social welfare. Transportation Research B 42 (2008) 19-37
5. Busink J.J. Effects of Increased Noise Stringencies on Fleet Composition and Noise Exposure at Schiphol Airport (2001), National Aerospace Laboratory NLR September
6. Carslaw D.C., Beevers S.D., Ropkins K., and Bell M.C. Detecting and quantifying aircraft and other on-airport contributions to ambient nitrogen oxides in the vicinity of a large international airport. Atmospheric Environment 40 (2006) 5424-5434
7. 2 Forecasts (2007), Department for Transport, London
8. Department of Transport and Regional Services. Expanding Ways to Describe and Assess Aircraft Noise. discussion paper (2000), Department of Transport and Regional Services, Canberra
9. Dings J.M.W., Wit R.C.N., Leurs B.A., Davidson M.D., and Fransen W. External Costs of Aviation (2003), Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt), Berlin
10. Eddington, R., 2006. The Eddington Transport Study - the Case for Action: Sir Rod Eddington's Advice to Government. London.
11. Endres G. The Illustrated Directory of Modern Commercial Aircraft (2001), Salamander Books Limited, London
12. Eurocontrol Experimental Centre. Aircraft Performance Summary Tables for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA), Revision 3.6. EEC Note No. 12/04, Project ACE-C-E2 (2004), Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, Brussels
13. European Environmental Agency. EMEP/CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook - 2005, Group 8: Other Mobile Sources and Machinery. (Chapter B851) (2005), Air Traffic European Environmental Agency, EEA, Copenhagen
14. Givoni M., and Rietveld P. Airlines' choice of aircraft size-explanations and implications. Transportation Research A 43 (2009) 500-510
15. Givoni M., and Banister D. Airline and railway integration. Transport Policy 13 (2006) 386-397
16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Aviation and the Global Atmosphere (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. Mason K.J. Airframe manufacturers: which has the better view of the future?. Journal of Air Transport Management 13 (2007) 9-15
18. Mohring H. Transportation Economics (1976), Ballinger, Cambridge, MA
19. Pearce, B., Pearce, D., 2000. Setting environmental taxes for aircraft: a case study of the UK. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE). Working Paper GEC 2000-26.
20. Rietveld P., and Bruinsma F. Is Transport Infrastructure Effective? Transport Infrastructure and Accessibility: Impacts on the Space Economy (1998), Springer, Berlin
21. Sutkus, D.J., Baughcum, S.L., DuBois, D.P., 2001. Scheduled Civil Aircraft Emission Inventories for 1999: Database Development and Analysis. NASA/CR-2001-211216, Washington DC.
22. US Environmental Protection Agency. Evaluation of Air Pollutant Emissions from Subsonic Commercial Jet Aircraft (1999), Environment Protection Agency EPA 420-R-99-013, April
23. Wei W., and Hansen M. Cost economics of aircraft size. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 37 (2003) 279-296