Recognition of interrupted sentences under conditions of spectral degradation

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 127, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Chatterjee, Monita ^a   Peredo, Fabiola ^a   Nelson, Desirae ^b   Başkent, Deniz ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COCHLEAR IMPLANT; INFORMATION STREAMS; TOP-DOWN PROCESS;

AUDITION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CONTINUOUS SPEECH RECOGNITION;

DEGRADATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECOGNITION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 76349089984     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3284544     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bashford, J. A., Jr., and Warren, R. M. (1987). " Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction.," Perception and Psychophyics 0031-5117 42, 114-121.
2. Bakent, D. (2007). " Effects of amplitude ramps on phonemic restoration.," in Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, July 16-20, Lake Tahoe, CA,.
3. Bakent, D., Eiler, C. L., and Edwards, B. (in press, 2009). " Perceptual restoration of speech by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.," Hear. Res. HERED3 0378-5955 10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.007
4. Boersma, P. (2001). " Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer.," Glot International 1381-3439 5, 341-345.
5. Chatterjee, M., and Peng, S. C. (2008). " Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.," Hear. Res. HERED3 0378-5955 235, 143-156. 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004 (Pubitemid 50019115)
6. Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Bakent, D., and Wang, X. (2001). " Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 110, 1150-1163. 10.1121/1.1381538 (Pubitemid 32734748)
7. Fu, Q.-J. (2006). TigerSpeech technology: Innovative speech software, version 1.05.02, available from http://www.tigerspeech.com/tst-tigercis.html/ (Last viewed Sept. 15, 2009).
8. Fu, Q.-J., Chinchilla, S., and Galvin, J. J. (2004). " The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.," J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. ZZZZZZ 1525-3961 5, 253-260. 10.1007/s10162-004-4046-1 (Pubitemid 39332096)
9. Gonzalez, J., and Oliver, J. C. (2005). " Gender and speaker identification as a function of the number of channels in spectrally reduced speech.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 118, 461-470. 10.1121/1.1928892 (Pubitemid 40981500)
10. Laures, J. S., and Weismer, G. (1999). " The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level.," J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. JSLRFW 1092-4388 42, 1148-1156.
11. Nelson, P. B., and Jin, S.-H. (2004). " Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 115, 2286-2294. 10.1121/1.1703538 (Pubitemid 38542143)
12. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. I., and Sullivan, J. A. (1994). " Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 95, 1985-1099.
13. Miller, G. A., and Licklider, J. C. (1950). " The intelligibility of interrupted speech.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 22, 167-173. 10.1121/1.1906584
14. Peng, S. C., Lu, N., and Chatterjee, M. (2009). " Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners.," Audiol. Neuro-Otol. ANEOFO 1420-3030 14, 327-337. 10.1159/000212112
15. Powers, G. L., and Wilcox, J. C. (1977). " Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 0001-4966 61, 195-199. 10.1121/1.381255 (Pubitemid 8027261)
16. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F. G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., and Ekelid, M. (1995). " Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.," Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 270, 303-304. 10.1126/science.270.5234.303
17. Warren, R. M., and Obusek, C. J. (1971). " Speech perception and phonemic restorations.," Percept. Psychophys. PEPSBJ 0031-5117 9, 358-362.