The Impact of Phenological Variation on Texture Measures of Remotely Sensed Imagery

IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 299-309

  Culbert, Patrick D ^a   Pidgeon, Anna M ^a   St Louis, Véronique ^a   Radeloff, Volker C ^a   Bash, Dallas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Directorate of Environment   (United States)

Author keywords

Image texture analysis; remote sensing; vegetation

Indexed keywords

COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION; FIRST-ORDER; GROWING SEASON; IMAGE TEXTURE; IMAGE TEXTURE ANALYSIS; INTERSEASONAL VARIABILITIES; MULTI-TEMPORAL; MULTIPLE IMAGE; NORTH AMERICAN; PHENOLOGICAL CHANGES; PHENOLOGICAL STAGE; REMOTELY SENSED IMAGERY; SECOND ORDERS; STUDY AREAS; STUDY SITES;

FORESTRY; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; VEGETATION;

TEXTURES;

BIOME; IMAGE RESOLUTION; PHENOLOGY; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SEASONAL VARIATION; SPATIAL VARIATION; TEXTURE;

NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 76249129011     PISSN: 19391404     EISSN: 21511535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2009.2021959     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. R. M. Haralick, “Statistical and structural approaches to texture,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 67, pp. 786–804, 1979.
2. A. Baraldi and F. Parmiggiani, “An investigation of the textural characteristics associated with gray-level cooccurrence matrix statistical parameters,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 293–304, Mar. 1995.
3. C. A. Coburn and A. C. B. Roberts, “A multiscale texture analysis procedure for improved forest stand classification,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 25, pp. 4287–4308, Oct. 2004.
4. S. E. Franklin, A. J. Maudie, and M. B. Lavigne, “Using spatial co-oc-currence texture to increase forest structure and species composition classification accuracy,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 67, pp. 849–855, July 2001.
5. S. E. Franklin, R. J. Hall, L. M. Moskal, A. J. Maudie, and M. B. Lavigne, “Incorporating texture into classification of forest species composition from airborne multispectral images,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 21, pp. 61–79, Jan. 10, 2000.
6. J. A. Hepinstall and S. A. Sader, “Using Bayesian statistics, thematic mapper satellite imagery, and breeding bird survey data to model bird species probability of occurrence in Maine,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 63, pp. 1231–1237, Oct. 1997.
7. E. M. Tuttle, R. R. Jensen, V. A. Formica, and R. A. Gonser, “Using remote sensing image texture to study habitat use patterns: A case study using the polymorphic white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia al-bicollis),” Global Ecol. Biogeogr., vol. 15, pp. 349–357, Jul. 2006.
8. L. D. Estes, G. S. Okin, A. G. Mwangi, and H. H. Shugart, “Habitat selection by a rare forest antelope: A multi-scale approach combining field data and imagery from three sensors,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 112, pp. 2033–2050, May 15, 2008.
9. A. L. Wunderle, S. E. Franklin, and X. G. Guo, “Regenerating boreal forest structure estimation using SPOT-5 pan-sharpened imagery,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 28, pp. 4351–4364, 2007.
10. F. Kayitakire, C. Hamel, and P. Defoury, “Retrieving forest structure variables based on image texture analysis and IKONOS-2 imagery,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 102, pp. 390–401, 2006, 6/15.
11. R. M. Haralick, K. Shanmuga, and I. Dinstein, “Textural features for image classification,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. SMC-3, pp. 610–621, 1973.
12. S. Tuominen and A. Pekkarinen, “Performance of different spectral and textural aerial photograph features in multi-source forest inventory,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 94, pp. 256–268, Jan. 30, 2005.
13. H. B. Musick and H. D. Grover, “Image textural measures as indices of landscape pattern,” in Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, M. G. Turner and K. J. Gaston, Eds. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991, pp. 77–103.
14. B. Tso and P. Mather, Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data. London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, 2001, pp. 212–216.
15. K. Johansen, N. C. Coops, S. E. Gergel, and Y. Stange, “Application of high spatial resolution satellite imagery for riparian and forest ecosystem classification,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 110, pp. 29–44, Sept. 14, 2007.
16. S. E. Franklin, M. A. Wulder, and G. R. Gerylo, “Texture analysis of IKONOS panchromatic data for Douglas-Fir forest age class separability in British Columbia,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 22, pp. 2627–2632, Sep. 10, 2001.
17. A. T. Hudak and C. A. Wessman, “Textural analysis of historical aerial photography to characterize woody plant encroachment in South African savanna,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 66, pp. 317–330, Dec. 1998.
18. M. A. Wulder, E. F. LeDrew, S. E. Franklin, and M. B. Lavigne, “Aerial image texture information in the estimation of northern deciduous and mixed wood forest leaf area index (LAI),” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 64, pp. 64–76, Apr. 1998.
19. M. L. Cody, “Habitat selection in birds—The roles of vegetation structure, competitors, and productivity,” Bioscience, vol. 31, pp. 107–113, 1981.
20. R. H. MacArthur and J. W. MacArthur, “On bird species diversity,” Ecology, vol. 42, pp. 594–598, Jul. 1961.
21. L. M. Beilis, A. M. Pidgeon, V. C. Radeloff, V. St.-Louis, J. L. Navarro, and M. B. Martella, “Modeling habitat suitability for greater rheas based on satellite image texture,” Ecol. Appl, to be published.
22. V. St.-Louis, A. M. Pidgeon, V. C. Radeloff, T. J. Hawbaker, and M. K. Clayton, “High-resolution image texture as a predictor of bird species richness,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 105, pp. 299–312, Dec. 30,2006.
23. V. St.-Louis, A. M. Pidgeon, M. K. Clayton, B. A. Locke, D. Bash, and V. C. Radeloff, “Satellite image texture and a vegetation index predict avian biodiversity in the Chihuahuan desert of New Mexico,” Ecography, to be published.
24. C. Vega-Garcia and E. Chuvieco, “Applying local measures of spatial heterogeneity to Landsat-TM images for predicting wildfire occurrence in Mediterranean landscapes,” Landscape Ecol, vol. 21, pp. 595–605, May 2006.
25. P. Peroni, F. Ferri, and G. C. Avena, “Temporal and spatial changes in a mountainous area of central Italy,” J. Veg. Sci., vol. 11, pp. 505–514, Aug. 2000.
26. C. J. Tucker, “Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 8, pp. 127–150, 1979.
27. R. G. Bailey, Description of the Ecoregions of the United States, U.S. Dept. Agriculture, 1995.
28. E. B. Wiken, Terrestrial Ecozones of Canada. Ecological Land Classification Series No. 19. Hull, QC, Canada: Environment Canada, 1986.
29. ERDAS Imagine 2005, Leica Geosystems, v. 9.0. [CD-ROM].
30. ENVI 2005, Research Systems Inc., v. 4.2. [CD-ROM].
31. S. E. Franklin, M. A. Wulder, and M. B. Lavigne, “Automated derivation of geographic window sizes for use in remote sensing digital image texture analysis,” Comput. Geosci., vol. 22, pp. 665–673, Jul. 1996.
32. B. C. Reed, J. F. Brown, D. VanderZee, T. R. Loveland, J. W. Merchant, and D. O. Ohlen, “Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery,” J. Veg. Sci., vol. 5, pp. 703–714, Nov. 1994.
33. X. Zhang, M. A. Friedl, C. B. Schaaf, A. H. Strahler, J. C. F. Hodges, F. Gao, B. C. Reed, and A. Huete, “Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 84, pp. 471–475, 2003, 3.
34. R. Stockli and P. L. Vidale, “European plant phenology and climate as seen in a 20-year AVHRR land-surface parameter dataset,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 25, pp. 3303–3330, Sept. 2004.
35. P. C. Smits and A. Annoni, “Updating land-cover maps by using texture information from very high-resolution space-borne imagery,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1244–1254, May 1999.
36. D. R. Peddle and S. E. Franklin, “Image texture processing and data integration for surface pattern-discrimination,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sen., vol. 57, pp. 413–420, Apr. 1991.
37. C. Homer, C. Huang, L. Yang, B. Wylie, and M. Coan, “Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sen., vol. 70, pp. 829–840, Jul. 2004.
38. P. T. Wolter, D. J. Mladenoff, G. E. Host, and T. R. Crow, “Improved foresty classification in the northern lake states using mult-temporal Landsat imagery,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 61, pp. 1129–1143, Sep. 1995.