Advances in the study of tumor pH-responsive polymeric micelles for cancer drug targeting delivery

Yaoxue Xuebao

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1328-1335

  Xu, Jin Xia ^a   Tang, Jian Bin ^b   Zhao, Lu Hang ^a   Shen, You Qing ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chemotherapy; Drug delivery system; Micelle; Nanomedicine; Neoplasm; pH responsive; Polymer

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BETA AMINO ACID; DOXORUBICIN; MACROGOL; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; NANOPARTICLE; PACLITAXEL; POLY(2 VINYLPYRIDINE); POLY(4 VINYLPYRIDINE); POLY(N,N DIETHYLAMINOMETHYLMETHACRYLATE); POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYETHYLENEIMINE; POLYHISTIDINE; POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACIDITY; CANCER CELL; CANCER THERAPY; CHEMICAL REACTION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG SOLUBILITY; DRUG TARGETING; ENDOCYTOSIS; ENDOSOME; INTERNALIZATION; LYSOSOME; MICELLE; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTON TRANSPORT; REVIEW;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MICELLES; NANOPARTICLES; NEOPLASMS; POLYMERS;

EID: 76249121949     PISSN: 05134870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Yu SZ. Anti-cancer stratigies of WHO [J]. China Cancer 2009, 18: 88-99.
2. Pinzani V, Bressolle F, Hang IJ, et al. Cisplatin-induced renal toxicity and toxicity-modulating strategies: a review [J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1994, 35: 1-9.
3. Gottesman MM. Mechanisms of cancer drug resistance [J]. Annu Rev Med, 2002, 53: 615-627.
4. Islam T, Josephson L. Current state and future applications of active targeting in malignancies using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles [J]. Cancer Biomark, 2009, 5: 99-107.
5. Sun Y, Wang C. Advances in the study of small peptides in targeted drug delivery system [J]. Acta Pharm Sin 2008, 43: 992-996.
6. Das M, Mohanty C, Sahoo SK. Ligand-based targeted therapy for cancer tissue [J]. Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2009, 6: 285-304.
7. Kwon GS. Polymeric micelles for delivery of poorly water-soluble compounds [J]. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst, 2003, 20: 357-403.
8. Kataoka K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: design, characterization and biological significance [J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2001, 47: 113-131.
9. Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC. Longcirculating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice [J]. Pharmacol Rev, 2001, 53: 283-318.
10. Sutton D, Nasongkla N, Blanco E, et al. Functionalized micellar systems for cancer targeted drug delivery [J]. Pharm Res, 2007, 24:1029-1046.
11. Guo M, Yan Y, Zhang HK, et al. Magnetic and pH-responsive nanocarriers with multilayer core-shell architecture for anti-cancer drug delivery [J]. J Mater Chem, 2008, 18: 5104-5112.
12. You J, Li X, Cui FD, et al. Folate-conjugated polymer micelles for active targeting to cancer cells: preparation, in vitro evaluation of targeting ability and cytotoxicity [J]. Nanotechnology, 2008, 19, 045102.
13. Rapoport N. Physical stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for anti-cancer drug delivery [J]. Prog Polym Sci, 2007, 32: 962-990.
14. Lee ES, Gao ZG, Bae YH. Recent progress in tumor pH targeting nanotechnology [J]. J Control Release, 2008, 132: 164-170.
15. Stubbs M, McSheehy PMJ, Griffiths JR, et al. Causes and consequences of tumor acidity and implications for treatment [J]. Mol Med Today, 2000, 6: 15-19.
16. Martin GR, Jain RK. Noninvasive measurement of interstital pH profiles in normal and neoplastic tissue using fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy [J]. Cancer Res, 1994, 54: 5670-5674.
17. Murphy RF, Powers S, Cantor CR. Endosome pH measured in single cells by dual fluorescence flow cytometry: rapid acidification of insulin to pH 6 [J]. J Cell Biol, 1984, 98: 1757-1762.
18. Killisch I, Steinlein P, Romisch K, et al. Characterization of early and late endocytic compartments of the transferrin cycle: transferrin receptor antibody blocks erythroid differentiation by trapping the receptor in the early endosome [J]. J Cell Sci, 1992, 103: 211-232.
19. Schmid S, Fuchs R, Kielian M, et al. Acidification of endosome subpopulations in wild-type Chinese hamster ovary cells and temperature- sensitive acidification-defective mutants [J]. J Cell Biol, 1989, 108: 1291-1300.
20. Steinman RM, Mellman IS, Muller WA, et al. Endocytosis and the recycling of plasma membrane [J]. J Cell Biol, 1983, 96: 1-27.
21. Fisher OZ, Kim Timothy, Dietz SR, et al. Enhanced core hydrophobicity, functionalization and cell penetration of polybasic nanomatrices [J]. Pharm Res, 2009, 26: 51-60.
22. Atkin R, Bradley M, Vincent B. Core-shell particles having silica cores and pH-responsive poly(vinylpyridine) shells [J]. Soft Matter, 2005, 1: 160-165.
23. Oh KT, Lee ES. Cancer-associated pH-responsive tetracopolymeric micelles composed of poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly (L-histidine)-b-poly( L-lactic acid)-b-poly(ethylene glycol) [J]. Polym Adv Technol, 2008, 19: 1907-1913.
24. Shen YQ, Tang HD, Zhan YH, et al. Degradable poly (β-amino ester) nanoparticles for cancer cytoplasmic drug delivery [J]. Nanomedicine, 2009, 5: 192-201.
25. Saito R, Yamaguchi K, Hara T, et al. Interaction between methylene blue and cyclic methacrylic acid oligomer [J]. Macromolecules, 2007, 40: 4621-4625.
26. Zhang L, Guo R, Yang M, et al. Thermo and pH dual-responsive nanoparticles for anti-cancer drug delivery [J]. Adv Mater, 2007, 19: 2988-2992.
27. Kusonwiriyawong C, van de Wetering P, Hubbell JA, et al. Evaluation of pH-dependent membrane-disruptive properties of poly(acrylic acid) derived polymers [J]. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2003, 56: 237-246.
28. Hao TN, Qiao MX, Li Z, et al. Progress in the study of pH and temperature sensitive biodegradable block copolymers [J]. Acta Pharm Sin 2008, 43: 123-127.
29. Bae Y, Fukushima S, Harada A, et al. Design of environment-sensitive supramolecular assemblies for intracellular drug delivery: polymeric micelles that are responsive to intracellular pH change [J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2003, 42: 4640-4643.
30. Bae Y, Nishiyama N, Fukushima S, et al. Preparation and biological characterization of polymeric micelle drug carriers with intracellular pH-triggered drug release property: tumor permeability, controlled subcellular drug distribution, and enhanced in vivo antitumor efficacy [J]. Bioconjugate Chem, 2005, 16: 122-130.
31. Gillies ER, Frechet JMJ. pH-responsive copolymer assemblies for controlled release of doxorubicin [J]. Bioconjugate Chem, 2005, 16: 361-368.
32. Gillies ER, Jonsson TB, Frechet JMJ. Stimuli-responsive supramolecular assemblies of linear-dendritic copolymers [J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2004, 126: 11936-11943.
33. Xu PS, Van Kirk EA, Zhan YH, et al. Targeted charge reversal nanoparticles for nuclear drug delivery [J]. Angew Chem (Int Ed Engl), 2007, 46: 4999-5002.
34. Huang XN, Du FS, Cheng J, et al. Acid-sensitive polymeric micelles based on thermoresponsive block copolymers with pendent cyclic orthoester groups [J]. Macromolecules, 2009, 42: 783-790.
35. Lee ES, Shin HJ, Na K, et al. Poly(L-histidine)-PEG block copolymer micelles and pH-induced destabilization targeted charge reversal nanoparticles for nuclear drug delivery [J]. J Control Release, 2003, 90: 363-374.
36. Lee ES, Na K, Bae YH. Polymeric micelle for tumor pH and folate-mediated targeting [J]. J Control Release, 2003, 91: 103-113.
37. Gao ZG, Lee DH, Kim DI, et al. Doxorubicin loaded pH-sensitive micelle targeting acidic extracellular pH of human ovarian A2780 tumor in mice [J]. J Drug Target, 2005, 13: 391-397.
38. Ko J, Park K, Kim YS, et al. Tumoral acidic extracellular pH targeting of pH-responsive MPEG-poly([beta]-amino ester) block copolymer micelles for cancer therapy [J]. J Control Release, 2007, 123: 109-115.
39. Lee ES, Na K, Bae YH. Super pH-sensitive multifunctional polymeric micelle [J]. Nano Lett, 2005, 5: 325-329.
40. Lee ES, Gao ZG, Kim D, et al. Super pH-sensitive multi-functional polymeric micelle for tumor pHe specific TAT exposure and multidrug resistance [J]. J Control Release, 2008, 129: 228-236.
41. Shen YQ, Zhan YH, Tang JB, et al. Multifunctioning pH-responsive nanoparticles from hierarchical self-assembly of polymer brush for cancer drug delivery [J]. AIChE J, 2008, 54: 2979-2989.
42. Bareford LM, Swaan PW. Endocytic mechanisms for targeted drug delivery [J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2007, 59: 748-758.
43. Hu Y, Litwin T, Nagaraja AR, et al. Cytosolic delivery of membrane-impermeable molecules in dendritic cells using pH-responsive core-shell nanoparticles [J]. Nano Lett, 2007, 7: 3056-3064.
44. Lee ES, Na K, Bae YH. Doxorubicin loaded pH-sensitive polymeric micelles for reversal of resistant MCF-7 tumor [J]. J Control Release, 2005, 103: 405-418.
45. Kim D, Lee ES, Park K, et al. Doxorubicin Loaded pH-sensitive micelle: antitumoral efficacy against ovarian A2780/DOXR tumor [J]. Pharma Res, 2008, 25: 2074-2082.
46. Xu PS, Van Kirk EA, Murdoch WJ, et al. Anticancer efficacies of cisplatin-releasing pH-responsive nanoparticles [J]. Biomacromolecules, 2006, 7: 829-835.
47. Griset AP, Walpole J, Liu R, et al. Expansile nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and in vivo efficacy of an acid-responsive polymeric drug delivery [J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2009, 131: 2469-2471.
48. Fuertes MA, Castilla J, Alonso C, et al. Molecular pharmacology of cisplatin: from cellular damage to apoptosis induction [J]. Recent Res Develop Mol Pharmacol, 2002, 1: 37-51.
49. Morjani H, Millot JM, Belhoussine R, et al. Anthracycline subcellular distribution in human leukemic cells by microspectrofluorometry: factors contributing to drug-induced cell death and reversal of multidrug resistance [J]. Leakemia, 1997, 11: 1170-1179.
50. Trehin R, Merkle HP. Chances and pitfalls of cell penetrating peptides for cellular drug delivery [J]. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2004, 58: 209-223.
51. Sethuraman VA, Bae YH. TAT peptide-based micelle system for potential active targeting of anti-cancer agents to acidic solid tumors [J]. J Control Release, 2007, 118: 216-224.
52. Godbey WT, Wu KK, Mikos AG. Tracking the intracellular path of poly(ethylenimine)/DNA complexes for gene delivery [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96: 5177-5181.
53. Verbaan FJ, Oussoren C, van Dam IM, et al. The fate of poly (2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)-based polyplexes after intravenous administration [J]. Int J Pharm, 2001, 214: 99-101.